Elbow hemiarthroplasty vs. open reduction internal fixation for acute Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) type 13C fractures—A systematic review

Background: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is the standard treatment for multifragmentary intra-articular distal humeral fractures. Fractures not amenable by ORIF are treated with total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). In recent years, elbow hemiarthroplasty (EHA) has been used as an alternati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreas F. Nielsen, MD, Ali Al-Hamdani, MD, Jeppe V. Rasmussen, PhD, Bo S. Olsen, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-09-01
Series:JSES International
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638322001359
_version_ 1811282850365833216
author Andreas F. Nielsen, MD
Ali Al-Hamdani, MD
Jeppe V. Rasmussen, PhD
Bo S. Olsen, PhD
author_facet Andreas F. Nielsen, MD
Ali Al-Hamdani, MD
Jeppe V. Rasmussen, PhD
Bo S. Olsen, PhD
author_sort Andreas F. Nielsen, MD
collection DOAJ
description Background: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is the standard treatment for multifragmentary intra-articular distal humeral fractures. Fractures not amenable by ORIF are treated with total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). In recent years, elbow hemiarthroplasty (EHA) has been used as an alternative to TEA, as weight bearing restrictions and risk of component loosening are lower. We systematically reviewed the literature reporting functional outcomes and complication rates after either EHA or ORIF for Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) type 13C fractures. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Scopus. The inclusion criteria were at least 5 patients, aged ≥50 years, AO/OTA type 13C fracture treated with ORIF or EHA, and evaluation with the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. Literature screening and data extraction were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The results were synthesized qualitatively using weighted means. No comparative statistical analyses were done. Results: We included 27 articles, which included 96 patients treated with EHA and 535 patients treated with ORIF. We identified 1 randomized controlled trial and 26 case series. The weighted mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 86.9 (n = 89) in the EHA group and 84.7 (n = 535) in the ORIF group. There were 26 (33%) complications (n = 78) in the EHA group and 103 (38%) complications (n = 270) in the ORIF group. Complication rates were generally high in both groups. Conclusion: We found comparable results of EHA and ORIF, which indicate that EHA is a viable treatment option for AO/OTA type 13C fractures not amenable by ORIF. Because of high risk of bias, interpretation of the results should be done with caution.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T01:59:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f5763e3d702c4c06869d4927c2fe7869
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-6383
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T01:59:58Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series JSES International
spelling doaj.art-f5763e3d702c4c06869d4927c2fe78692022-12-22T03:07:39ZengElsevierJSES International2666-63832022-09-0165713722Elbow hemiarthroplasty vs. open reduction internal fixation for acute Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) type 13C fractures—A systematic reviewAndreas F. Nielsen, MD0Ali Al-Hamdani, MD1Jeppe V. Rasmussen, PhD2Bo S. Olsen, PhD3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark; Corresponding author: Andreas Falkenberg Nielsen, MD, Skulder-, Albue- og Håndkirurgi, klinik 1, Gentofte Hospital, Gentofte Hospitalsvej 17, st, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, DenmarkDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, København N, DenmarkDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, København N, DenmarkBackground: Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is the standard treatment for multifragmentary intra-articular distal humeral fractures. Fractures not amenable by ORIF are treated with total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). In recent years, elbow hemiarthroplasty (EHA) has been used as an alternative to TEA, as weight bearing restrictions and risk of component loosening are lower. We systematically reviewed the literature reporting functional outcomes and complication rates after either EHA or ORIF for Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) type 13C fractures. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Scopus. The inclusion criteria were at least 5 patients, aged ≥50 years, AO/OTA type 13C fracture treated with ORIF or EHA, and evaluation with the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. Literature screening and data extraction were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The results were synthesized qualitatively using weighted means. No comparative statistical analyses were done. Results: We included 27 articles, which included 96 patients treated with EHA and 535 patients treated with ORIF. We identified 1 randomized controlled trial and 26 case series. The weighted mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score was 86.9 (n = 89) in the EHA group and 84.7 (n = 535) in the ORIF group. There were 26 (33%) complications (n = 78) in the EHA group and 103 (38%) complications (n = 270) in the ORIF group. Complication rates were generally high in both groups. Conclusion: We found comparable results of EHA and ORIF, which indicate that EHA is a viable treatment option for AO/OTA type 13C fractures not amenable by ORIF. Because of high risk of bias, interpretation of the results should be done with caution.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638322001359Elbow fracturesDistal humeral fracturesFracture fixationOsteosynthesisArthroplastyAO type C
spellingShingle Andreas F. Nielsen, MD
Ali Al-Hamdani, MD
Jeppe V. Rasmussen, PhD
Bo S. Olsen, PhD
Elbow hemiarthroplasty vs. open reduction internal fixation for acute Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) type 13C fractures—A systematic review
JSES International
Elbow fractures
Distal humeral fractures
Fracture fixation
Osteosynthesis
Arthroplasty
AO type C
title Elbow hemiarthroplasty vs. open reduction internal fixation for acute Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) type 13C fractures—A systematic review
title_full Elbow hemiarthroplasty vs. open reduction internal fixation for acute Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) type 13C fractures—A systematic review
title_fullStr Elbow hemiarthroplasty vs. open reduction internal fixation for acute Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) type 13C fractures—A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Elbow hemiarthroplasty vs. open reduction internal fixation for acute Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) type 13C fractures—A systematic review
title_short Elbow hemiarthroplasty vs. open reduction internal fixation for acute Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) type 13C fractures—A systematic review
title_sort elbow hemiarthroplasty vs open reduction internal fixation for acute arbeitsgemeinschaft fur osteosynthesefragen orthopaedic trauma association ao ota type 13c fractures a systematic review
topic Elbow fractures
Distal humeral fractures
Fracture fixation
Osteosynthesis
Arthroplasty
AO type C
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638322001359
work_keys_str_mv AT andreasfnielsenmd elbowhemiarthroplastyvsopenreductioninternalfixationforacutearbeitsgemeinschaftfurosteosynthesefragenorthopaedictraumaassociationaootatype13cfracturesasystematicreview
AT alialhamdanimd elbowhemiarthroplastyvsopenreductioninternalfixationforacutearbeitsgemeinschaftfurosteosynthesefragenorthopaedictraumaassociationaootatype13cfracturesasystematicreview
AT jeppevrasmussenphd elbowhemiarthroplastyvsopenreductioninternalfixationforacutearbeitsgemeinschaftfurosteosynthesefragenorthopaedictraumaassociationaootatype13cfracturesasystematicreview
AT bosolsenphd elbowhemiarthroplastyvsopenreductioninternalfixationforacutearbeitsgemeinschaftfurosteosynthesefragenorthopaedictraumaassociationaootatype13cfracturesasystematicreview