A Preliminary Techno-Economic Analysis on the Calcium Looping Process with Simultaneous Capture of CO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> from a Coal-Based Combustion Power Plant

The increase of capital investments and operation and maintenance (O&M) costs represents a current limitation to the diffusion of carbon capture systems for the clean combustion of fossil fuels. However, post-combustion systems, such as calcium looping (CaL), for CO<sub>2</sub> captu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antonio Coppola, Fabrizio Scala
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-05-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2176
_version_ 1797569089248428032
author Antonio Coppola
Fabrizio Scala
author_facet Antonio Coppola
Fabrizio Scala
author_sort Antonio Coppola
collection DOAJ
description The increase of capital investments and operation and maintenance (O&M) costs represents a current limitation to the diffusion of carbon capture systems for the clean combustion of fossil fuels. However, post-combustion systems, such as calcium looping (CaL), for CO<sub>2</sub> capture from flue gas are the most attractive carbon capture systems since they can be installed at new plants and retrofitted into existing power plants. This work investigates the pros and cons of employing a calcium looping system for CO<sub>2</sub> capture and also as a desulphurization unit. A preliminary techno-economic analysis was carried out comparing a base case consisting of a coal-based power plant of about 550MWe with a desulphurization unit (Case 1), the same plant but with a CaL system added for CO<sub>2</sub> capture (Case 2), or the same plant but with a CaL system for simultaneous capture of CO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> and the removal of the desulphurization unit (Case 3). Case 2 resulted in a 67% increase of capital investment with respect to the benchmark case, while the increase was lower (48%) in Case 3. In terms of O&M costs, the most important item was represented by the yearly maintenance cost of the desulphurization unit. In fact, in Case 3, a reduction of O&M costs of about 8% was observed with respect to Case 2.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T20:07:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f59810c587054c5c9713c2f78a45d922
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T20:07:01Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-f59810c587054c5c9713c2f78a45d9222023-11-19T23:16:05ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732020-05-01139217610.3390/en13092176A Preliminary Techno-Economic Analysis on the Calcium Looping Process with Simultaneous Capture of CO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> from a Coal-Based Combustion Power PlantAntonio Coppola0Fabrizio Scala1Istituto di Ricerche sulla Combustione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Piazzale Vincenzo Tecchio 80, 80125 Napoli, ItalyIstituto di Ricerche sulla Combustione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Piazzale Vincenzo Tecchio 80, 80125 Napoli, ItalyThe increase of capital investments and operation and maintenance (O&M) costs represents a current limitation to the diffusion of carbon capture systems for the clean combustion of fossil fuels. However, post-combustion systems, such as calcium looping (CaL), for CO<sub>2</sub> capture from flue gas are the most attractive carbon capture systems since they can be installed at new plants and retrofitted into existing power plants. This work investigates the pros and cons of employing a calcium looping system for CO<sub>2</sub> capture and also as a desulphurization unit. A preliminary techno-economic analysis was carried out comparing a base case consisting of a coal-based power plant of about 550MWe with a desulphurization unit (Case 1), the same plant but with a CaL system added for CO<sub>2</sub> capture (Case 2), or the same plant but with a CaL system for simultaneous capture of CO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> and the removal of the desulphurization unit (Case 3). Case 2 resulted in a 67% increase of capital investment with respect to the benchmark case, while the increase was lower (48%) in Case 3. In terms of O&M costs, the most important item was represented by the yearly maintenance cost of the desulphurization unit. In fact, in Case 3, a reduction of O&M costs of about 8% was observed with respect to Case 2.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2176CO<sub>2</sub> capturecalcium loopingdesulphurizationtechno-economic analysiscoal-based power plant
spellingShingle Antonio Coppola
Fabrizio Scala
A Preliminary Techno-Economic Analysis on the Calcium Looping Process with Simultaneous Capture of CO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> from a Coal-Based Combustion Power Plant
Energies
CO<sub>2</sub> capture
calcium looping
desulphurization
techno-economic analysis
coal-based power plant
title A Preliminary Techno-Economic Analysis on the Calcium Looping Process with Simultaneous Capture of CO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> from a Coal-Based Combustion Power Plant
title_full A Preliminary Techno-Economic Analysis on the Calcium Looping Process with Simultaneous Capture of CO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> from a Coal-Based Combustion Power Plant
title_fullStr A Preliminary Techno-Economic Analysis on the Calcium Looping Process with Simultaneous Capture of CO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> from a Coal-Based Combustion Power Plant
title_full_unstemmed A Preliminary Techno-Economic Analysis on the Calcium Looping Process with Simultaneous Capture of CO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> from a Coal-Based Combustion Power Plant
title_short A Preliminary Techno-Economic Analysis on the Calcium Looping Process with Simultaneous Capture of CO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> from a Coal-Based Combustion Power Plant
title_sort preliminary techno economic analysis on the calcium looping process with simultaneous capture of co sub 2 sub and so sub 2 sub from a coal based combustion power plant
topic CO<sub>2</sub> capture
calcium looping
desulphurization
techno-economic analysis
coal-based power plant
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2176
work_keys_str_mv AT antoniocoppola apreliminarytechnoeconomicanalysisonthecalciumloopingprocesswithsimultaneouscaptureofcosub2subandsosub2subfromacoalbasedcombustionpowerplant
AT fabrizioscala apreliminarytechnoeconomicanalysisonthecalciumloopingprocesswithsimultaneouscaptureofcosub2subandsosub2subfromacoalbasedcombustionpowerplant
AT antoniocoppola preliminarytechnoeconomicanalysisonthecalciumloopingprocesswithsimultaneouscaptureofcosub2subandsosub2subfromacoalbasedcombustionpowerplant
AT fabrizioscala preliminarytechnoeconomicanalysisonthecalciumloopingprocesswithsimultaneouscaptureofcosub2subandsosub2subfromacoalbasedcombustionpowerplant