A Preliminary Techno-Economic Analysis on the Calcium Looping Process with Simultaneous Capture of CO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> from a Coal-Based Combustion Power Plant
The increase of capital investments and operation and maintenance (O&M) costs represents a current limitation to the diffusion of carbon capture systems for the clean combustion of fossil fuels. However, post-combustion systems, such as calcium looping (CaL), for CO<sub>2</sub> captu...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-05-01
|
Series: | Energies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2176 |
_version_ | 1797569089248428032 |
---|---|
author | Antonio Coppola Fabrizio Scala |
author_facet | Antonio Coppola Fabrizio Scala |
author_sort | Antonio Coppola |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The increase of capital investments and operation and maintenance (O&M) costs represents a current limitation to the diffusion of carbon capture systems for the clean combustion of fossil fuels. However, post-combustion systems, such as calcium looping (CaL), for CO<sub>2</sub> capture from flue gas are the most attractive carbon capture systems since they can be installed at new plants and retrofitted into existing power plants. This work investigates the pros and cons of employing a calcium looping system for CO<sub>2</sub> capture and also as a desulphurization unit. A preliminary techno-economic analysis was carried out comparing a base case consisting of a coal-based power plant of about 550MWe with a desulphurization unit (Case 1), the same plant but with a CaL system added for CO<sub>2</sub> capture (Case 2), or the same plant but with a CaL system for simultaneous capture of CO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> and the removal of the desulphurization unit (Case 3). Case 2 resulted in a 67% increase of capital investment with respect to the benchmark case, while the increase was lower (48%) in Case 3. In terms of O&M costs, the most important item was represented by the yearly maintenance cost of the desulphurization unit. In fact, in Case 3, a reduction of O&M costs of about 8% was observed with respect to Case 2. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T20:07:01Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f59810c587054c5c9713c2f78a45d922 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1996-1073 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T20:07:01Z |
publishDate | 2020-05-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Energies |
spelling | doaj.art-f59810c587054c5c9713c2f78a45d9222023-11-19T23:16:05ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732020-05-01139217610.3390/en13092176A Preliminary Techno-Economic Analysis on the Calcium Looping Process with Simultaneous Capture of CO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> from a Coal-Based Combustion Power PlantAntonio Coppola0Fabrizio Scala1Istituto di Ricerche sulla Combustione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Piazzale Vincenzo Tecchio 80, 80125 Napoli, ItalyIstituto di Ricerche sulla Combustione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Piazzale Vincenzo Tecchio 80, 80125 Napoli, ItalyThe increase of capital investments and operation and maintenance (O&M) costs represents a current limitation to the diffusion of carbon capture systems for the clean combustion of fossil fuels. However, post-combustion systems, such as calcium looping (CaL), for CO<sub>2</sub> capture from flue gas are the most attractive carbon capture systems since they can be installed at new plants and retrofitted into existing power plants. This work investigates the pros and cons of employing a calcium looping system for CO<sub>2</sub> capture and also as a desulphurization unit. A preliminary techno-economic analysis was carried out comparing a base case consisting of a coal-based power plant of about 550MWe with a desulphurization unit (Case 1), the same plant but with a CaL system added for CO<sub>2</sub> capture (Case 2), or the same plant but with a CaL system for simultaneous capture of CO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> and the removal of the desulphurization unit (Case 3). Case 2 resulted in a 67% increase of capital investment with respect to the benchmark case, while the increase was lower (48%) in Case 3. In terms of O&M costs, the most important item was represented by the yearly maintenance cost of the desulphurization unit. In fact, in Case 3, a reduction of O&M costs of about 8% was observed with respect to Case 2.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2176CO<sub>2</sub> capturecalcium loopingdesulphurizationtechno-economic analysiscoal-based power plant |
spellingShingle | Antonio Coppola Fabrizio Scala A Preliminary Techno-Economic Analysis on the Calcium Looping Process with Simultaneous Capture of CO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> from a Coal-Based Combustion Power Plant Energies CO<sub>2</sub> capture calcium looping desulphurization techno-economic analysis coal-based power plant |
title | A Preliminary Techno-Economic Analysis on the Calcium Looping Process with Simultaneous Capture of CO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> from a Coal-Based Combustion Power Plant |
title_full | A Preliminary Techno-Economic Analysis on the Calcium Looping Process with Simultaneous Capture of CO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> from a Coal-Based Combustion Power Plant |
title_fullStr | A Preliminary Techno-Economic Analysis on the Calcium Looping Process with Simultaneous Capture of CO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> from a Coal-Based Combustion Power Plant |
title_full_unstemmed | A Preliminary Techno-Economic Analysis on the Calcium Looping Process with Simultaneous Capture of CO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> from a Coal-Based Combustion Power Plant |
title_short | A Preliminary Techno-Economic Analysis on the Calcium Looping Process with Simultaneous Capture of CO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> from a Coal-Based Combustion Power Plant |
title_sort | preliminary techno economic analysis on the calcium looping process with simultaneous capture of co sub 2 sub and so sub 2 sub from a coal based combustion power plant |
topic | CO<sub>2</sub> capture calcium looping desulphurization techno-economic analysis coal-based power plant |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2176 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT antoniocoppola apreliminarytechnoeconomicanalysisonthecalciumloopingprocesswithsimultaneouscaptureofcosub2subandsosub2subfromacoalbasedcombustionpowerplant AT fabrizioscala apreliminarytechnoeconomicanalysisonthecalciumloopingprocesswithsimultaneouscaptureofcosub2subandsosub2subfromacoalbasedcombustionpowerplant AT antoniocoppola preliminarytechnoeconomicanalysisonthecalciumloopingprocesswithsimultaneouscaptureofcosub2subandsosub2subfromacoalbasedcombustionpowerplant AT fabrizioscala preliminarytechnoeconomicanalysisonthecalciumloopingprocesswithsimultaneouscaptureofcosub2subandsosub2subfromacoalbasedcombustionpowerplant |