Comparison of High Frequency and Low Frequency Tympanometry Findings in Normal Neonates

Abstract Background: Tympanometry is one of the most important audiological tests for the assessment of neonatal hearing screening programs. This test is usually done using a 226 Hertz probe tone; however, in infants less than 6 months of age, using this probe tone frequency is not reliable due to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mahdi Panahian, Ehsan Nafari, Nasim Daneshdoost, Danial Habibi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Arak Medical University 2018-01-01
Series:Majallah-i dānishgāh-i ̒ulūm-i pizishkī-i Arāk
Subjects:
Online Access:http://amuj.arakmu.ac.ir/article-1-5426-en.pdf
_version_ 1819199950444036096
author Mahdi Panahian
Ehsan Nafari
Nasim Daneshdoost
Danial Habibi
author_facet Mahdi Panahian
Ehsan Nafari
Nasim Daneshdoost
Danial Habibi
author_sort Mahdi Panahian
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background: Tympanometry is one of the most important audiological tests for the assessment of neonatal hearing screening programs. This test is usually done using a 226 Hertz probe tone; however, in infants less than 6 months of age, using this probe tone frequency is not reliable due to the different characteristics of the middle ear compared to adults. The purpose of this study was to assess the obtained tympanometric data in neonates 1 to 14 days with normal hearing using 226, 678, 800 and 1000 Hertz frequency probes tones. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 30 neonates aged 1 to 14 days who were diagnosed as normal in hearing aspect with using otoacoustic emissions test, were assessed by tympanometry. Tympanometric tests were performed using 226, 678, 800 and 1000 Hertz frequency probe tones for both ears. For data analysis, the T-paired method has been used. Results: With using 226 Hertz frequency probe tone, incidence of unusual double peak tympanograms was observed in 65% of cases, which with increasing frequency of the probe tone, this percentage was decreased. There was also a statistically significant difference between the static admittance peak compensated in two 226 and 1000 Hertz frequency probes tones. Conclusion: In neonates with normal hearing and without any risk factors for hearing loss, the 1000-Hertz Tympanogram shows a better middle ear status than the 226-Hertz tympanogram.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T03:24:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f5abc56c1e6c4a0c8566b67c80bfcd09
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1735-5338
2008-644X
language fas
last_indexed 2024-12-23T03:24:29Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Arak Medical University
record_format Article
series Majallah-i dānishgāh-i ̒ulūm-i pizishkī-i Arāk
spelling doaj.art-f5abc56c1e6c4a0c8566b67c80bfcd092022-12-21T18:01:54ZfasArak Medical UniversityMajallah-i dānishgāh-i ̒ulūm-i pizishkī-i Arāk1735-53382008-644X2018-01-0120102028Comparison of High Frequency and Low Frequency Tympanometry Findings in Normal NeonatesMahdi Panahian0Ehsan Nafari1Nasim Daneshdoost2Danial Habibi3Instructor, Department of Audiology, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, IranBS of Audiology, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, IranBS of Audiology, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, IranMSc in Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, IranAbstract Background: Tympanometry is one of the most important audiological tests for the assessment of neonatal hearing screening programs. This test is usually done using a 226 Hertz probe tone; however, in infants less than 6 months of age, using this probe tone frequency is not reliable due to the different characteristics of the middle ear compared to adults. The purpose of this study was to assess the obtained tympanometric data in neonates 1 to 14 days with normal hearing using 226, 678, 800 and 1000 Hertz frequency probes tones. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 30 neonates aged 1 to 14 days who were diagnosed as normal in hearing aspect with using otoacoustic emissions test, were assessed by tympanometry. Tympanometric tests were performed using 226, 678, 800 and 1000 Hertz frequency probe tones for both ears. For data analysis, the T-paired method has been used. Results: With using 226 Hertz frequency probe tone, incidence of unusual double peak tympanograms was observed in 65% of cases, which with increasing frequency of the probe tone, this percentage was decreased. There was also a statistically significant difference between the static admittance peak compensated in two 226 and 1000 Hertz frequency probes tones. Conclusion: In neonates with normal hearing and without any risk factors for hearing loss, the 1000-Hertz Tympanogram shows a better middle ear status than the 226-Hertz tympanogram.http://amuj.arakmu.ac.ir/article-1-5426-en.pdfHigh frequencyLow frequencyNeonateTympanometry
spellingShingle Mahdi Panahian
Ehsan Nafari
Nasim Daneshdoost
Danial Habibi
Comparison of High Frequency and Low Frequency Tympanometry Findings in Normal Neonates
Majallah-i dānishgāh-i ̒ulūm-i pizishkī-i Arāk
High frequency
Low frequency
Neonate
Tympanometry
title Comparison of High Frequency and Low Frequency Tympanometry Findings in Normal Neonates
title_full Comparison of High Frequency and Low Frequency Tympanometry Findings in Normal Neonates
title_fullStr Comparison of High Frequency and Low Frequency Tympanometry Findings in Normal Neonates
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of High Frequency and Low Frequency Tympanometry Findings in Normal Neonates
title_short Comparison of High Frequency and Low Frequency Tympanometry Findings in Normal Neonates
title_sort comparison of high frequency and low frequency tympanometry findings in normal neonates
topic High frequency
Low frequency
Neonate
Tympanometry
url http://amuj.arakmu.ac.ir/article-1-5426-en.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mahdipanahian comparisonofhighfrequencyandlowfrequencytympanometryfindingsinnormalneonates
AT ehsannafari comparisonofhighfrequencyandlowfrequencytympanometryfindingsinnormalneonates
AT nasimdaneshdoost comparisonofhighfrequencyandlowfrequencytympanometryfindingsinnormalneonates
AT danialhabibi comparisonofhighfrequencyandlowfrequencytympanometryfindingsinnormalneonates