Design Considerations and Selection of Cost-Effective Switched Reluctance Drive for Radiator Cooling Fans

Switched reluctance motors (SRMs) are simple in structure, easy to manufacture, magnet-less, brushless, and highly robust compared to other AC motors which makes them a good option for applications that operate in harsh environment. However, the motor has non-linear magnetic characteristics, and it...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ickjin Son, Grace Firsta Lukman, Mazahir Hussain Shah, Kwang-Il Jeong, Jin-Woo Ahn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Electronics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/10/8/917
_version_ 1797538028760072192
author Ickjin Son
Grace Firsta Lukman
Mazahir Hussain Shah
Kwang-Il Jeong
Jin-Woo Ahn
author_facet Ickjin Son
Grace Firsta Lukman
Mazahir Hussain Shah
Kwang-Il Jeong
Jin-Woo Ahn
author_sort Ickjin Son
collection DOAJ
description Switched reluctance motors (SRMs) are simple in structure, easy to manufacture, magnet-less, brushless, and highly robust compared to other AC motors which makes them a good option for applications that operate in harsh environment. However, the motor has non-linear magnetic characteristics, and it comes with various pole-phase combinations and circuit topologies that causes many difficulties in deciding on which type to choose. In this paper, the viability of SRM as a low-cost, rugged machine for vehicle radiator cooling fan is considered. First, necessary design considerations are presented, then three commonly use types of SRM are analyzed: A 3-phase 6/4, 3-phase 12/8, and a 4-phase 8/6 to find their static and dynamic characteristics so the most suitable type can be selected. Simulation results show that the 8/6 SRM produces the highest efficiency with less phase current which reduces the converter burden. However, with asymmetric half bridge converter, eight power switches are required for 8/6 SRM and thus put a burden on the overall drive cost. As a solution, the Miller converter with only six switches for four phase SRM. To verify the proposed idea, the 8/6 SRM was manufactured and tested. The results show that Miller converter can be used for the proposed SRM with slightly reduced efficiency at 80.4%.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T12:24:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f5b8b5a8812e47e0a1c8252a097d0344
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-9292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T12:24:39Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Electronics
spelling doaj.art-f5b8b5a8812e47e0a1c8252a097d03442023-11-21T15:11:27ZengMDPI AGElectronics2079-92922021-04-0110891710.3390/electronics10080917Design Considerations and Selection of Cost-Effective Switched Reluctance Drive for Radiator Cooling FansIckjin Son0Grace Firsta Lukman1Mazahir Hussain Shah2Kwang-Il Jeong3Jin-Woo Ahn4Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Kyungsung University, Busan 48434, KoreaDepartment of Mechatronics Engineering, Kyungsung University, Busan 48434, KoreaDepartment of Mechatronics Engineering, Kyungsung University, Busan 48434, KoreaDepartment of Mechatronics Engineering, Kyungsung University, Busan 48434, KoreaDepartment of Mechatronics Engineering, Kyungsung University, Busan 48434, KoreaSwitched reluctance motors (SRMs) are simple in structure, easy to manufacture, magnet-less, brushless, and highly robust compared to other AC motors which makes them a good option for applications that operate in harsh environment. However, the motor has non-linear magnetic characteristics, and it comes with various pole-phase combinations and circuit topologies that causes many difficulties in deciding on which type to choose. In this paper, the viability of SRM as a low-cost, rugged machine for vehicle radiator cooling fan is considered. First, necessary design considerations are presented, then three commonly use types of SRM are analyzed: A 3-phase 6/4, 3-phase 12/8, and a 4-phase 8/6 to find their static and dynamic characteristics so the most suitable type can be selected. Simulation results show that the 8/6 SRM produces the highest efficiency with less phase current which reduces the converter burden. However, with asymmetric half bridge converter, eight power switches are required for 8/6 SRM and thus put a burden on the overall drive cost. As a solution, the Miller converter with only six switches for four phase SRM. To verify the proposed idea, the 8/6 SRM was manufactured and tested. The results show that Miller converter can be used for the proposed SRM with slightly reduced efficiency at 80.4%.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/10/8/917radiator fanfinite element analysis (FEA)switched reluctance motor (SRM)low-cost drive
spellingShingle Ickjin Son
Grace Firsta Lukman
Mazahir Hussain Shah
Kwang-Il Jeong
Jin-Woo Ahn
Design Considerations and Selection of Cost-Effective Switched Reluctance Drive for Radiator Cooling Fans
Electronics
radiator fan
finite element analysis (FEA)
switched reluctance motor (SRM)
low-cost drive
title Design Considerations and Selection of Cost-Effective Switched Reluctance Drive for Radiator Cooling Fans
title_full Design Considerations and Selection of Cost-Effective Switched Reluctance Drive for Radiator Cooling Fans
title_fullStr Design Considerations and Selection of Cost-Effective Switched Reluctance Drive for Radiator Cooling Fans
title_full_unstemmed Design Considerations and Selection of Cost-Effective Switched Reluctance Drive for Radiator Cooling Fans
title_short Design Considerations and Selection of Cost-Effective Switched Reluctance Drive for Radiator Cooling Fans
title_sort design considerations and selection of cost effective switched reluctance drive for radiator cooling fans
topic radiator fan
finite element analysis (FEA)
switched reluctance motor (SRM)
low-cost drive
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/10/8/917
work_keys_str_mv AT ickjinson designconsiderationsandselectionofcosteffectiveswitchedreluctancedriveforradiatorcoolingfans
AT gracefirstalukman designconsiderationsandselectionofcosteffectiveswitchedreluctancedriveforradiatorcoolingfans
AT mazahirhussainshah designconsiderationsandselectionofcosteffectiveswitchedreluctancedriveforradiatorcoolingfans
AT kwangiljeong designconsiderationsandselectionofcosteffectiveswitchedreluctancedriveforradiatorcoolingfans
AT jinwooahn designconsiderationsandselectionofcosteffectiveswitchedreluctancedriveforradiatorcoolingfans