No interaction between fundamental-frequency differences and spectral region when perceiving speech in a speech background.

Differences in fundamental frequency (F0) or pitch between competing voices facilitate our ability to segregate a target voice from interferers, thereby enhancing speech intelligibility. Although lower-numbered harmonics elicit a stronger and more accurate pitch sensation than higher-numbered harmon...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sara M K Madsen, Torsten Dau, Andrew J Oxenham
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249654
_version_ 1818902680365432832
author Sara M K Madsen
Torsten Dau
Andrew J Oxenham
author_facet Sara M K Madsen
Torsten Dau
Andrew J Oxenham
author_sort Sara M K Madsen
collection DOAJ
description Differences in fundamental frequency (F0) or pitch between competing voices facilitate our ability to segregate a target voice from interferers, thereby enhancing speech intelligibility. Although lower-numbered harmonics elicit a stronger and more accurate pitch sensation than higher-numbered harmonics, it is unclear whether the stronger pitch leads to an increased benefit of pitch differences when segregating competing talkers. To answer this question, sentence recognition was tested in young normal-hearing listeners in the presence of a single competing talker. The stimuli were presented in a broadband condition or were highpass or lowpass filtered to manipulate the pitch accuracy of the voicing, while maintaining roughly equal speech intelligibility in the highpass and lowpass regions. Performance was measured with average F0 differences (ΔF0) between the target and single-talker masker of 0, 2, and 4 semitones. Pitch discrimination abilities were also measured to confirm that the lowpass-filtered stimuli elicited greater pitch accuracy than the highpass-filtered stimuli. No interaction was found between filter type and ΔF0 in the sentence recognition task, suggesting little or no effect of harmonic rank or pitch accuracy on the ability to use F0 to segregate natural voices, even when the average ΔF0 is relatively small. The results suggest that listeners are able to obtain some benefit of pitch differences between competing voices, even when pitch salience and accuracy is low.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T20:39:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f5cda6fcff754d028300333e6bccec5e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T20:39:30Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-f5cda6fcff754d028300333e6bccec5e2022-12-21T20:06:27ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01164e024965410.1371/journal.pone.0249654No interaction between fundamental-frequency differences and spectral region when perceiving speech in a speech background.Sara M K MadsenTorsten DauAndrew J OxenhamDifferences in fundamental frequency (F0) or pitch between competing voices facilitate our ability to segregate a target voice from interferers, thereby enhancing speech intelligibility. Although lower-numbered harmonics elicit a stronger and more accurate pitch sensation than higher-numbered harmonics, it is unclear whether the stronger pitch leads to an increased benefit of pitch differences when segregating competing talkers. To answer this question, sentence recognition was tested in young normal-hearing listeners in the presence of a single competing talker. The stimuli were presented in a broadband condition or were highpass or lowpass filtered to manipulate the pitch accuracy of the voicing, while maintaining roughly equal speech intelligibility in the highpass and lowpass regions. Performance was measured with average F0 differences (ΔF0) between the target and single-talker masker of 0, 2, and 4 semitones. Pitch discrimination abilities were also measured to confirm that the lowpass-filtered stimuli elicited greater pitch accuracy than the highpass-filtered stimuli. No interaction was found between filter type and ΔF0 in the sentence recognition task, suggesting little or no effect of harmonic rank or pitch accuracy on the ability to use F0 to segregate natural voices, even when the average ΔF0 is relatively small. The results suggest that listeners are able to obtain some benefit of pitch differences between competing voices, even when pitch salience and accuracy is low.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249654
spellingShingle Sara M K Madsen
Torsten Dau
Andrew J Oxenham
No interaction between fundamental-frequency differences and spectral region when perceiving speech in a speech background.
PLoS ONE
title No interaction between fundamental-frequency differences and spectral region when perceiving speech in a speech background.
title_full No interaction between fundamental-frequency differences and spectral region when perceiving speech in a speech background.
title_fullStr No interaction between fundamental-frequency differences and spectral region when perceiving speech in a speech background.
title_full_unstemmed No interaction between fundamental-frequency differences and spectral region when perceiving speech in a speech background.
title_short No interaction between fundamental-frequency differences and spectral region when perceiving speech in a speech background.
title_sort no interaction between fundamental frequency differences and spectral region when perceiving speech in a speech background
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249654
work_keys_str_mv AT saramkmadsen nointeractionbetweenfundamentalfrequencydifferencesandspectralregionwhenperceivingspeechinaspeechbackground
AT torstendau nointeractionbetweenfundamentalfrequencydifferencesandspectralregionwhenperceivingspeechinaspeechbackground
AT andrewjoxenham nointeractionbetweenfundamentalfrequencydifferencesandspectralregionwhenperceivingspeechinaspeechbackground