Public Participation in Biodiversity Impact Assessment in the State of West Bengal, India: Present Status and Finding Ways for Improvement

The present status of public participation in EIA particularly concerning biodiversity in West Bengal, India was studied. The issues raised in 50 public hearings were analyzed and chapters on biodiversity in 20 EIA reports were studied. Areas needing improvement were identified. Scientific literatur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rajarshi Chakraborty, Andre Lindner, Wolfgang Wende
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Environments
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3298/8/5/39
_version_ 1797536283889762304
author Rajarshi Chakraborty
Andre Lindner
Wolfgang Wende
author_facet Rajarshi Chakraborty
Andre Lindner
Wolfgang Wende
author_sort Rajarshi Chakraborty
collection DOAJ
description The present status of public participation in EIA particularly concerning biodiversity in West Bengal, India was studied. The issues raised in 50 public hearings were analyzed and chapters on biodiversity in 20 EIA reports were studied. Areas needing improvement were identified. Scientific literature was studied to gather best practices/concepts. It was observed that, despite all enabling legal provisions, public participation in EIA has not grown to its full potential. The discussion was mostly on jobs and benefits (and little on biodiversity impact). EIA reports did not provide any spatial information on biodiversity-rich/sensitive areas or impact on bio-resources that are used by people. We identified four pillars of effective public participation in EIA as: (i) institutional opportunity and conducive environment for participation; (ii) interest of local people to participate; (iii) capacity building of local people; and, (iv) support of clearance process. Specific recommendations under each are provided. A simple matrix for Biodiversity Impact Assessment and a list of components for the improvement of biodiversity, for use of local people, have been developed.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T11:57:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f5fa83d7db4b40e088d5c24ecf166138
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3298
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T11:57:30Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Environments
spelling doaj.art-f5fa83d7db4b40e088d5c24ecf1661382023-11-21T17:14:53ZengMDPI AGEnvironments2076-32982021-04-01853910.3390/environments8050039Public Participation in Biodiversity Impact Assessment in the State of West Bengal, India: Present Status and Finding Ways for ImprovementRajarshi Chakraborty0Andre Lindner1Wolfgang Wende2Department of Environment, Government of West Bengal, Kolkata 7000106, IndiaSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, GermanySchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, GermanyThe present status of public participation in EIA particularly concerning biodiversity in West Bengal, India was studied. The issues raised in 50 public hearings were analyzed and chapters on biodiversity in 20 EIA reports were studied. Areas needing improvement were identified. Scientific literature was studied to gather best practices/concepts. It was observed that, despite all enabling legal provisions, public participation in EIA has not grown to its full potential. The discussion was mostly on jobs and benefits (and little on biodiversity impact). EIA reports did not provide any spatial information on biodiversity-rich/sensitive areas or impact on bio-resources that are used by people. We identified four pillars of effective public participation in EIA as: (i) institutional opportunity and conducive environment for participation; (ii) interest of local people to participate; (iii) capacity building of local people; and, (iv) support of clearance process. Specific recommendations under each are provided. A simple matrix for Biodiversity Impact Assessment and a list of components for the improvement of biodiversity, for use of local people, have been developed.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3298/8/5/39environmental impact assessment (EIA)biodiversity offsetspublic participationlocal people
spellingShingle Rajarshi Chakraborty
Andre Lindner
Wolfgang Wende
Public Participation in Biodiversity Impact Assessment in the State of West Bengal, India: Present Status and Finding Ways for Improvement
Environments
environmental impact assessment (EIA)
biodiversity offsets
public participation
local people
title Public Participation in Biodiversity Impact Assessment in the State of West Bengal, India: Present Status and Finding Ways for Improvement
title_full Public Participation in Biodiversity Impact Assessment in the State of West Bengal, India: Present Status and Finding Ways for Improvement
title_fullStr Public Participation in Biodiversity Impact Assessment in the State of West Bengal, India: Present Status and Finding Ways for Improvement
title_full_unstemmed Public Participation in Biodiversity Impact Assessment in the State of West Bengal, India: Present Status and Finding Ways for Improvement
title_short Public Participation in Biodiversity Impact Assessment in the State of West Bengal, India: Present Status and Finding Ways for Improvement
title_sort public participation in biodiversity impact assessment in the state of west bengal india present status and finding ways for improvement
topic environmental impact assessment (EIA)
biodiversity offsets
public participation
local people
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3298/8/5/39
work_keys_str_mv AT rajarshichakraborty publicparticipationinbiodiversityimpactassessmentinthestateofwestbengalindiapresentstatusandfindingwaysforimprovement
AT andrelindner publicparticipationinbiodiversityimpactassessmentinthestateofwestbengalindiapresentstatusandfindingwaysforimprovement
AT wolfgangwende publicparticipationinbiodiversityimpactassessmentinthestateofwestbengalindiapresentstatusandfindingwaysforimprovement