Radical Pairing Interactions and Donor–Acceptor Interactions in Cyclobis(paraquat-p-phenylene) Inclusion Complexes

Understanding molecular interactions in mechanically interlocked molecules (MIMs) is challenging because they can be either donor–acceptor interactions or radical pairing interactions, depending on the charge states and multiplicities in the different components of the MIMs. In this work, for the fi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wei Wang, Wei Wu, Peifeng Su
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-02-01
Series:Molecules
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/28/5/2057
_version_ 1797614852630380544
author Wei Wang
Wei Wu
Peifeng Su
author_facet Wei Wang
Wei Wu
Peifeng Su
author_sort Wei Wang
collection DOAJ
description Understanding molecular interactions in mechanically interlocked molecules (MIMs) is challenging because they can be either donor–acceptor interactions or radical pairing interactions, depending on the charge states and multiplicities in the different components of the MIMs. In this work, for the first time, the interactions between cyclobis(paraquat-p-phenylene) (abbreviated as CBPQT<sup>n+</sup> (<i>n</i> = 0–4)) and a series of recognition units (RUs) were investigated using the energy decomposition analysis approach (EDA). These RUs include bipyridinium radical cation (BIPY<sup>•+</sup>), naphthalene-1,8:4,5-bis(dicarboximide) radical anion (NDI<sup>•−</sup>), their oxidized states (BIPY<sup>2+</sup> and NDI), neutral electron-rich tetrathiafulvalene (TTF) and neutral bis-dithiazolyl radical (BTA<sup>•</sup>). The results of generalized Kohn–Sham energy decomposition analysis (GKS-EDA) reveal that for the CBPQT<sup>n+</sup>···RU interactions, correlation/dispersion terms always have large contributions, while electrostatic and desolvation terms are sensitive to the variation in charge states in CBPQT<sup>n+</sup> and RU. For all the CBPQT<sup>n+</sup>···RU interactions, desolvation terms always tend to overcome the repulsive electrostatic interactions between the CBPQT cation and RU cation. Electrostatic interaction is important when RU has the negative charge. Moreover, the different physical origins of donor–acceptor interactions and radical pairing interactions are compared and discussed. Compared to donor–acceptor interactions, in radical pairing interactions, the polarization term is always small, while the correlation/dispersion term is important. With regard to donor–acceptor interactions, in some cases, polarization terms could be quite large due to the electron transfer between the CBPQT ring and RU, which responds to the large geometrical relaxation of the whole systems.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T07:18:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f60261b2e51b4820a149d6c0134e5f61
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1420-3049
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T07:18:07Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Molecules
spelling doaj.art-f60261b2e51b4820a149d6c0134e5f612023-11-17T08:11:27ZengMDPI AGMolecules1420-30492023-02-01285205710.3390/molecules28052057Radical Pairing Interactions and Donor–Acceptor Interactions in Cyclobis(paraquat-p-phenylene) Inclusion ComplexesWei Wang0Wei Wu1Peifeng Su2Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, The State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, and College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, ChinaFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, The State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, and College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, ChinaFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, The State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, and College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, ChinaUnderstanding molecular interactions in mechanically interlocked molecules (MIMs) is challenging because they can be either donor–acceptor interactions or radical pairing interactions, depending on the charge states and multiplicities in the different components of the MIMs. In this work, for the first time, the interactions between cyclobis(paraquat-p-phenylene) (abbreviated as CBPQT<sup>n+</sup> (<i>n</i> = 0–4)) and a series of recognition units (RUs) were investigated using the energy decomposition analysis approach (EDA). These RUs include bipyridinium radical cation (BIPY<sup>•+</sup>), naphthalene-1,8:4,5-bis(dicarboximide) radical anion (NDI<sup>•−</sup>), their oxidized states (BIPY<sup>2+</sup> and NDI), neutral electron-rich tetrathiafulvalene (TTF) and neutral bis-dithiazolyl radical (BTA<sup>•</sup>). The results of generalized Kohn–Sham energy decomposition analysis (GKS-EDA) reveal that for the CBPQT<sup>n+</sup>···RU interactions, correlation/dispersion terms always have large contributions, while electrostatic and desolvation terms are sensitive to the variation in charge states in CBPQT<sup>n+</sup> and RU. For all the CBPQT<sup>n+</sup>···RU interactions, desolvation terms always tend to overcome the repulsive electrostatic interactions between the CBPQT cation and RU cation. Electrostatic interaction is important when RU has the negative charge. Moreover, the different physical origins of donor–acceptor interactions and radical pairing interactions are compared and discussed. Compared to donor–acceptor interactions, in radical pairing interactions, the polarization term is always small, while the correlation/dispersion term is important. With regard to donor–acceptor interactions, in some cases, polarization terms could be quite large due to the electron transfer between the CBPQT ring and RU, which responds to the large geometrical relaxation of the whole systems.https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/28/5/2057radical pairing interactionsdonor–acceptor interactionsmechanically interlocked moleculesenergy decomposition analysis
spellingShingle Wei Wang
Wei Wu
Peifeng Su
Radical Pairing Interactions and Donor–Acceptor Interactions in Cyclobis(paraquat-p-phenylene) Inclusion Complexes
Molecules
radical pairing interactions
donor–acceptor interactions
mechanically interlocked molecules
energy decomposition analysis
title Radical Pairing Interactions and Donor–Acceptor Interactions in Cyclobis(paraquat-p-phenylene) Inclusion Complexes
title_full Radical Pairing Interactions and Donor–Acceptor Interactions in Cyclobis(paraquat-p-phenylene) Inclusion Complexes
title_fullStr Radical Pairing Interactions and Donor–Acceptor Interactions in Cyclobis(paraquat-p-phenylene) Inclusion Complexes
title_full_unstemmed Radical Pairing Interactions and Donor–Acceptor Interactions in Cyclobis(paraquat-p-phenylene) Inclusion Complexes
title_short Radical Pairing Interactions and Donor–Acceptor Interactions in Cyclobis(paraquat-p-phenylene) Inclusion Complexes
title_sort radical pairing interactions and donor acceptor interactions in cyclobis paraquat p phenylene inclusion complexes
topic radical pairing interactions
donor–acceptor interactions
mechanically interlocked molecules
energy decomposition analysis
url https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/28/5/2057
work_keys_str_mv AT weiwang radicalpairinginteractionsanddonoracceptorinteractionsincyclobisparaquatpphenyleneinclusioncomplexes
AT weiwu radicalpairinginteractionsanddonoracceptorinteractionsincyclobisparaquatpphenyleneinclusioncomplexes
AT peifengsu radicalpairinginteractionsanddonoracceptorinteractionsincyclobisparaquatpphenyleneinclusioncomplexes