Establishing the financial burden of alopecia areata and its predictors

Abstract Background Alopecia areata (AA) can have a significant impact on wellbeing. Consequently, individuals with AA often seek treatments or products to promote hair regrowth or camouflage their hair loss that incur a financial cost to the individual. Objectives The current study aimed to examine...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fabio Zucchelli, Matthew Harries, Andrew Messenger, Kerry Montgomery
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-02-01
Series:Skin Health and Disease
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ski2.301
_version_ 1797336271603892224
author Fabio Zucchelli
Matthew Harries
Andrew Messenger
Kerry Montgomery
author_facet Fabio Zucchelli
Matthew Harries
Andrew Messenger
Kerry Montgomery
author_sort Fabio Zucchelli
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Alopecia areata (AA) can have a significant impact on wellbeing. Consequently, individuals with AA often seek treatments or products to promote hair regrowth or camouflage their hair loss that incur a financial cost to the individual. Objectives The current study aimed to examine the direct financial burden of AA to understand the wider impact of the condition and the factors which influence spending on products and services. Methods A total of 829 United Kingdom based participants completed an online survey. Demographic and condition‐specific data were collected, alongside spending on AA‐related products and services. Participants were asked about their use of products and services, the associated costs, how they financed these costs, and their household income to determine what percentage of income they spent on products and services. Results Participants predominantly identified as female (85.9%), white (92.7%) with a mean age of 42.7 years and a median AA duration of 10.94 years. Female gender, Asian ethnicity, lower income, and worse AA symptoms predicted higher spend from income. Wigs were the most common product used and incurred the greatest cost (median £700). The highest cost for men was private dermatology services (median = £550). On average people spent 3% of their disposable income (prior to housing costs) on AA‐related products and services. Conclusions This study outlines the risk factors associated with higher financial burden from managing AA which require consideration by health providers, commissioners, and policy makers when designing services to support the wellbeing of people living with AA.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T08:51:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f618399ea89c4964b1a19267803da55a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2690-442X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T08:51:51Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Skin Health and Disease
spelling doaj.art-f618399ea89c4964b1a19267803da55a2024-02-01T09:32:21ZengWileySkin Health and Disease2690-442X2024-02-0141n/an/a10.1002/ski2.301Establishing the financial burden of alopecia areata and its predictorsFabio Zucchelli0Matthew Harries1Andrew Messenger2Kerry Montgomery3Centre for Appearance Research University West of the England Bristol UKSalford Royal Hospital Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust Manchester Academic Health Science Centre Manchester UKUniversity of Sheffield Sheffield UKAlopecia UK Shipley UKAbstract Background Alopecia areata (AA) can have a significant impact on wellbeing. Consequently, individuals with AA often seek treatments or products to promote hair regrowth or camouflage their hair loss that incur a financial cost to the individual. Objectives The current study aimed to examine the direct financial burden of AA to understand the wider impact of the condition and the factors which influence spending on products and services. Methods A total of 829 United Kingdom based participants completed an online survey. Demographic and condition‐specific data were collected, alongside spending on AA‐related products and services. Participants were asked about their use of products and services, the associated costs, how they financed these costs, and their household income to determine what percentage of income they spent on products and services. Results Participants predominantly identified as female (85.9%), white (92.7%) with a mean age of 42.7 years and a median AA duration of 10.94 years. Female gender, Asian ethnicity, lower income, and worse AA symptoms predicted higher spend from income. Wigs were the most common product used and incurred the greatest cost (median £700). The highest cost for men was private dermatology services (median = £550). On average people spent 3% of their disposable income (prior to housing costs) on AA‐related products and services. Conclusions This study outlines the risk factors associated with higher financial burden from managing AA which require consideration by health providers, commissioners, and policy makers when designing services to support the wellbeing of people living with AA.https://doi.org/10.1002/ski2.301
spellingShingle Fabio Zucchelli
Matthew Harries
Andrew Messenger
Kerry Montgomery
Establishing the financial burden of alopecia areata and its predictors
Skin Health and Disease
title Establishing the financial burden of alopecia areata and its predictors
title_full Establishing the financial burden of alopecia areata and its predictors
title_fullStr Establishing the financial burden of alopecia areata and its predictors
title_full_unstemmed Establishing the financial burden of alopecia areata and its predictors
title_short Establishing the financial burden of alopecia areata and its predictors
title_sort establishing the financial burden of alopecia areata and its predictors
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ski2.301
work_keys_str_mv AT fabiozucchelli establishingthefinancialburdenofalopeciaareataanditspredictors
AT matthewharries establishingthefinancialburdenofalopeciaareataanditspredictors
AT andrewmessenger establishingthefinancialburdenofalopeciaareataanditspredictors
AT kerrymontgomery establishingthefinancialburdenofalopeciaareataanditspredictors