The Comparison of Shear Bond Strength Between Fibre Reinforced Composite Posts with Three Different Composite Core Materials – An In vitro Study
Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the shear bond strength between fiber reinforced composite post with three different composite core materials. Materials and Methods: The materials used for the study were: 30 maxillary central incisors, pre fabricated fiber reinforced composite post (po...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
2014-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/3941/77-7692_CE[Ra]_F(DK)_PF1(NH)_PFA(H)_PFA2(H)_PF2(RKH)_(NJH).pdf |
_version_ | 1818912826674118656 |
---|---|
author | Sampath Anche Pranitha Kakarla Krishna Kishore Kadiyala Sreedevi B. Sandeep Chiramana Sanjay Dutt Manne Raviavi Rakesh Dev J. Deepthi G. |
author_facet | Sampath Anche Pranitha Kakarla Krishna Kishore Kadiyala Sreedevi B. Sandeep Chiramana Sanjay Dutt Manne Raviavi Rakesh Dev J. Deepthi G. |
author_sort | Sampath Anche |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the shear bond strength
between fiber reinforced composite post with three different
composite core materials.
Materials and Methods: The materials used for the study were:
30 maxillary central incisors, pre fabricated fiber reinforced
composite post (postec plus posts), Multi-core heavy body, Ticore, Fluoro-core, Etchant gel, Silane coupling agent, Dentin
bonding agent, Standardized gutta percha points, Rely-X dual
cure composite resin. A total of 30 human maxillary central incisor
were selected for this study. They were divided into three groups
of 10 specimens each namely A, B and C.
Results: The results obtained were analyzed by using one way
analysis (ANOVA) and Tukey Honestly Significant Difference and
they showed highest mean shear bond strength for group C
when compared with group A and group B. There is no significant
difference in the shear bond strength values between group A
and group B.
Conclusion: The teeth restored with multicore HB showed highest
shear bond strength. The teeth restored with Fluoro core showed
lowest shear bond strength. No statistically significant difference
exists between the shear bond strength values between Ti-core
and Fluoro-core. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-19T23:20:46Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f6189bd753e2481cb03f3a142a2aac32 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2249-782X 0973-709X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-19T23:20:46Z |
publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
publisher | JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
spelling | doaj.art-f6189bd753e2481cb03f3a142a2aac322022-12-21T20:01:59ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2014-01-018123623810.7860/JCDR/2014/7692.3941The Comparison of Shear Bond Strength Between Fibre Reinforced Composite Posts with Three Different Composite Core Materials – An In vitro StudySampath Anche0Pranitha Kakarla1Krishna Kishore Kadiyala2Sreedevi B.3Sandeep Chiramana4Sanjay Dutt Manne5Raviavi Rakesh Dev J.6Deepthi G.7Senior Lecturer, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Takkellapadu, Guntur, A.P.-522509, India.Professor, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Takkellapadu, Guntur, A.P.-522509, India.Professor, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Takkellapadu, Guntur, A.P.-522509, India.Professor, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Takkellapadu, Guntur, A.P.-522509, India.Private Practitioner, Takkellapadu, Guntur, A.P.-522509, India.Reader, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Takkellapadu, Guntur, A.P.-522509, India.Senior Lecturer, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Takkellapadu, Guntur, A.P.-522509, India.PG Student, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Takkellapadu, Guntur, A.P.-522509, India.Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the shear bond strength between fiber reinforced composite post with three different composite core materials. Materials and Methods: The materials used for the study were: 30 maxillary central incisors, pre fabricated fiber reinforced composite post (postec plus posts), Multi-core heavy body, Ticore, Fluoro-core, Etchant gel, Silane coupling agent, Dentin bonding agent, Standardized gutta percha points, Rely-X dual cure composite resin. A total of 30 human maxillary central incisor were selected for this study. They were divided into three groups of 10 specimens each namely A, B and C. Results: The results obtained were analyzed by using one way analysis (ANOVA) and Tukey Honestly Significant Difference and they showed highest mean shear bond strength for group C when compared with group A and group B. There is no significant difference in the shear bond strength values between group A and group B. Conclusion: The teeth restored with multicore HB showed highest shear bond strength. The teeth restored with Fluoro core showed lowest shear bond strength. No statistically significant difference exists between the shear bond strength values between Ti-core and Fluoro-core.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/3941/77-7692_CE[Ra]_F(DK)_PF1(NH)_PFA(H)_PFA2(H)_PF2(RKH)_(NJH).pdfshear bond strengthmulticore heavy bodyti-corefluorocorefiber reinforced composite (frc) post |
spellingShingle | Sampath Anche Pranitha Kakarla Krishna Kishore Kadiyala Sreedevi B. Sandeep Chiramana Sanjay Dutt Manne Raviavi Rakesh Dev J. Deepthi G. The Comparison of Shear Bond Strength Between Fibre Reinforced Composite Posts with Three Different Composite Core Materials – An In vitro Study Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research shear bond strength multicore heavy body ti-core fluorocore fiber reinforced composite (frc) post |
title | The Comparison of Shear Bond Strength Between Fibre Reinforced Composite Posts with Three Different Composite Core Materials – An In vitro Study |
title_full | The Comparison of Shear Bond Strength Between Fibre Reinforced Composite Posts with Three Different Composite Core Materials – An In vitro Study |
title_fullStr | The Comparison of Shear Bond Strength Between Fibre Reinforced Composite Posts with Three Different Composite Core Materials – An In vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | The Comparison of Shear Bond Strength Between Fibre Reinforced Composite Posts with Three Different Composite Core Materials – An In vitro Study |
title_short | The Comparison of Shear Bond Strength Between Fibre Reinforced Composite Posts with Three Different Composite Core Materials – An In vitro Study |
title_sort | comparison of shear bond strength between fibre reinforced composite posts with three different composite core materials an in vitro study |
topic | shear bond strength multicore heavy body ti-core fluorocore fiber reinforced composite (frc) post |
url | https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/3941/77-7692_CE[Ra]_F(DK)_PF1(NH)_PFA(H)_PFA2(H)_PF2(RKH)_(NJH).pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sampathanche thecomparisonofshearbondstrengthbetweenfibrereinforcedcompositepostswiththreedifferentcompositecorematerialsaninvitrostudy AT pranithakakarla thecomparisonofshearbondstrengthbetweenfibrereinforcedcompositepostswiththreedifferentcompositecorematerialsaninvitrostudy AT krishnakishorekadiyala thecomparisonofshearbondstrengthbetweenfibrereinforcedcompositepostswiththreedifferentcompositecorematerialsaninvitrostudy AT sreedevib thecomparisonofshearbondstrengthbetweenfibrereinforcedcompositepostswiththreedifferentcompositecorematerialsaninvitrostudy AT sandeepchiramana thecomparisonofshearbondstrengthbetweenfibrereinforcedcompositepostswiththreedifferentcompositecorematerialsaninvitrostudy AT sanjayduttmanne thecomparisonofshearbondstrengthbetweenfibrereinforcedcompositepostswiththreedifferentcompositecorematerialsaninvitrostudy AT raviavirakeshdevj thecomparisonofshearbondstrengthbetweenfibrereinforcedcompositepostswiththreedifferentcompositecorematerialsaninvitrostudy AT deepthig thecomparisonofshearbondstrengthbetweenfibrereinforcedcompositepostswiththreedifferentcompositecorematerialsaninvitrostudy AT sampathanche comparisonofshearbondstrengthbetweenfibrereinforcedcompositepostswiththreedifferentcompositecorematerialsaninvitrostudy AT pranithakakarla comparisonofshearbondstrengthbetweenfibrereinforcedcompositepostswiththreedifferentcompositecorematerialsaninvitrostudy AT krishnakishorekadiyala comparisonofshearbondstrengthbetweenfibrereinforcedcompositepostswiththreedifferentcompositecorematerialsaninvitrostudy AT sreedevib comparisonofshearbondstrengthbetweenfibrereinforcedcompositepostswiththreedifferentcompositecorematerialsaninvitrostudy AT sandeepchiramana comparisonofshearbondstrengthbetweenfibrereinforcedcompositepostswiththreedifferentcompositecorematerialsaninvitrostudy AT sanjayduttmanne comparisonofshearbondstrengthbetweenfibrereinforcedcompositepostswiththreedifferentcompositecorematerialsaninvitrostudy AT raviavirakeshdevj comparisonofshearbondstrengthbetweenfibrereinforcedcompositepostswiththreedifferentcompositecorematerialsaninvitrostudy AT deepthig comparisonofshearbondstrengthbetweenfibrereinforcedcompositepostswiththreedifferentcompositecorematerialsaninvitrostudy |