Polycentric vs monocentric urban structure contribution to national development

Abstract The debate about polycentricity and subordinacy has always been a critical topic that planners, economists, and socialists argued about for centuries. The idea of concentricity vs decentralization has affected all life metabolic activities. Urban structure has always been declared to be the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ashraf Sami Mahmoud Abozeid, Tarek Abdellatif AboElatta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2021-09-01
Series:Journal of Engineering and Applied Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-021-00011-1
_version_ 1828146694408110080
author Ashraf Sami Mahmoud Abozeid
Tarek Abdellatif AboElatta
author_facet Ashraf Sami Mahmoud Abozeid
Tarek Abdellatif AboElatta
author_sort Ashraf Sami Mahmoud Abozeid
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The debate about polycentricity and subordinacy has always been a critical topic that planners, economists, and socialists argued about for centuries. The idea of concentricity vs decentralization has affected all life metabolic activities. Urban structure has always been declared to be the key factor that affects life metabolism significantly. However, after the pandemic COVID-19, the planning strategies have changed dramatically. The main purpose is to investigate the most appropriate urbanization approach that achieves the best development results. The research methodology is to define and measure the fabric independency as an approach to estimate its self-sufficiency that enables it to stand in front of the pandemic challenges at different circumstances. The paper uses the fabric diversity index as a sensitive indicator of independency and polycentricity of the urban structure. The main conclusion for this paper is that independent polycentric urban agglomerations that are strongly linked achieve much better development results than subordinate cities depending on the main core city. The data used for the analysis are extracted from the Urban Atlas developed by the European Environmental Agency in addition to the UN-Habitat annual report. All calculations, analyses, and deductions are exclusively carried by the author.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T20:50:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f62200a0efa34b28be982b718f6bca19
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1110-1903
2536-9512
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T20:50:35Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Journal of Engineering and Applied Science
spelling doaj.art-f62200a0efa34b28be982b718f6bca192022-12-22T04:03:52ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Engineering and Applied Science1110-19032536-95122021-09-0168111810.1186/s44147-021-00011-1Polycentric vs monocentric urban structure contribution to national developmentAshraf Sami Mahmoud Abozeid0Tarek Abdellatif AboElatta1Department of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo UniversityDepartment of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo UniversityAbstract The debate about polycentricity and subordinacy has always been a critical topic that planners, economists, and socialists argued about for centuries. The idea of concentricity vs decentralization has affected all life metabolic activities. Urban structure has always been declared to be the key factor that affects life metabolism significantly. However, after the pandemic COVID-19, the planning strategies have changed dramatically. The main purpose is to investigate the most appropriate urbanization approach that achieves the best development results. The research methodology is to define and measure the fabric independency as an approach to estimate its self-sufficiency that enables it to stand in front of the pandemic challenges at different circumstances. The paper uses the fabric diversity index as a sensitive indicator of independency and polycentricity of the urban structure. The main conclusion for this paper is that independent polycentric urban agglomerations that are strongly linked achieve much better development results than subordinate cities depending on the main core city. The data used for the analysis are extracted from the Urban Atlas developed by the European Environmental Agency in addition to the UN-Habitat annual report. All calculations, analyses, and deductions are exclusively carried by the author.https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-021-00011-1IndependencySatelliteUrban structureUrban agglomerationUrban diversityPolycentricity
spellingShingle Ashraf Sami Mahmoud Abozeid
Tarek Abdellatif AboElatta
Polycentric vs monocentric urban structure contribution to national development
Journal of Engineering and Applied Science
Independency
Satellite
Urban structure
Urban agglomeration
Urban diversity
Polycentricity
title Polycentric vs monocentric urban structure contribution to national development
title_full Polycentric vs monocentric urban structure contribution to national development
title_fullStr Polycentric vs monocentric urban structure contribution to national development
title_full_unstemmed Polycentric vs monocentric urban structure contribution to national development
title_short Polycentric vs monocentric urban structure contribution to national development
title_sort polycentric vs monocentric urban structure contribution to national development
topic Independency
Satellite
Urban structure
Urban agglomeration
Urban diversity
Polycentricity
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-021-00011-1
work_keys_str_mv AT ashrafsamimahmoudabozeid polycentricvsmonocentricurbanstructurecontributiontonationaldevelopment
AT tarekabdellatifaboelatta polycentricvsmonocentricurbanstructurecontributiontonationaldevelopment