Store-and-Forward Images in Teledermatology: Narrative Literature Review

BackgroundStore-and-forward (SAF) teledermatology uses electronically stored information, including patient photographs and demographic information, for clinical decision-making asynchronous to the patient encounter. The integration of SAF teledermatology into clinical practi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simon W Jiang, Michael Seth Flynn, Jeffery T Kwock, Matilda W Nicholas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2022-07-01
Series:JMIR Dermatology
Online Access:https://derma.jmir.org/2022/3/e37517
_version_ 1797327594867130368
author Simon W Jiang
Michael Seth Flynn
Jeffery T Kwock
Matilda W Nicholas
author_facet Simon W Jiang
Michael Seth Flynn
Jeffery T Kwock
Matilda W Nicholas
author_sort Simon W Jiang
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundStore-and-forward (SAF) teledermatology uses electronically stored information, including patient photographs and demographic information, for clinical decision-making asynchronous to the patient encounter. The integration of SAF teledermatology into clinical practice has been increasing in recent years, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite this growth, data regarding the outcomes of SAF teledermatology are limited. A key distinction among current literature involves comparing the quality and utility of images obtained by patients and trained clinicians, as these metrics may vary by the clinical expertise of the photographer. ObjectiveThis narrative literature review aimed to characterize the outcomes of SAF teledermatology through the lens of patient- versus clinician-initiated photography and highlight important future directions for and challenges of the field. MethodsA literature search of peer-reviewed research was performed between February and April 2021. Key search terms included patient-initiated, patient-submitted, clinician-initiated, clinician-submitted, store-and-forward, asynchronous, remote, image, photograph, and teledermatology. Only studies published after 2001 in English were included. In total, 47 studies were identified from the PubMed electronic database and Google Scholar after omitting duplicate articles. ResultsImage quality and diagnostic concordance are generally lower and more variable with patient-submitted images, which may impact their decision-making utility. SAF teledermatology can improve the efficiency of and access to care when photographs are taken by either clinicians or patients. The clinical outcomes of clinician-submitted images are comparable to those of in-person visits in the few studies that have investigated these outcomes. Coinciding with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, asynchronous teledermatology helped minimize unnecessary in-person visits in the outpatient setting, as many uncomplicated conditions could be adequately managed remotely via images captured by patients and referring clinicians. For the inpatient setting, SAF teledermatology minimized unnecessary contact during dermatology consultations, although current studies are limited by the heterogeneity of their outcomes. ConclusionsIn general, photographs taken by trained clinicians are higher quality and have better and more relevant diagnostic and clinical outcomes. SAF teledermatology helped clinicians avoid unnecessary physical contact with patients in the outpatient and inpatient settings during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asynchronous teledermatology will likely play a greater role in the future as SAF images become integrated into synchronous teledermatology workflows. However, the obstacles summarized in this review should be addressed before its widespread implementation into clinical practice.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T06:40:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f628eabdbef54fa1b1491fc19fb52d2e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2562-0959
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T06:40:47Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR Dermatology
spelling doaj.art-f628eabdbef54fa1b1491fc19fb52d2e2024-02-03T09:07:06ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Dermatology2562-09592022-07-0153e3751710.2196/37517Store-and-Forward Images in Teledermatology: Narrative Literature ReviewSimon W Jianghttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9509-9001Michael Seth Flynnhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7941-1069Jeffery T Kwockhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0343-2453Matilda W Nicholashttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2179-0529 BackgroundStore-and-forward (SAF) teledermatology uses electronically stored information, including patient photographs and demographic information, for clinical decision-making asynchronous to the patient encounter. The integration of SAF teledermatology into clinical practice has been increasing in recent years, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite this growth, data regarding the outcomes of SAF teledermatology are limited. A key distinction among current literature involves comparing the quality and utility of images obtained by patients and trained clinicians, as these metrics may vary by the clinical expertise of the photographer. ObjectiveThis narrative literature review aimed to characterize the outcomes of SAF teledermatology through the lens of patient- versus clinician-initiated photography and highlight important future directions for and challenges of the field. MethodsA literature search of peer-reviewed research was performed between February and April 2021. Key search terms included patient-initiated, patient-submitted, clinician-initiated, clinician-submitted, store-and-forward, asynchronous, remote, image, photograph, and teledermatology. Only studies published after 2001 in English were included. In total, 47 studies were identified from the PubMed electronic database and Google Scholar after omitting duplicate articles. ResultsImage quality and diagnostic concordance are generally lower and more variable with patient-submitted images, which may impact their decision-making utility. SAF teledermatology can improve the efficiency of and access to care when photographs are taken by either clinicians or patients. The clinical outcomes of clinician-submitted images are comparable to those of in-person visits in the few studies that have investigated these outcomes. Coinciding with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, asynchronous teledermatology helped minimize unnecessary in-person visits in the outpatient setting, as many uncomplicated conditions could be adequately managed remotely via images captured by patients and referring clinicians. For the inpatient setting, SAF teledermatology minimized unnecessary contact during dermatology consultations, although current studies are limited by the heterogeneity of their outcomes. ConclusionsIn general, photographs taken by trained clinicians are higher quality and have better and more relevant diagnostic and clinical outcomes. SAF teledermatology helped clinicians avoid unnecessary physical contact with patients in the outpatient and inpatient settings during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asynchronous teledermatology will likely play a greater role in the future as SAF images become integrated into synchronous teledermatology workflows. However, the obstacles summarized in this review should be addressed before its widespread implementation into clinical practice.https://derma.jmir.org/2022/3/e37517
spellingShingle Simon W Jiang
Michael Seth Flynn
Jeffery T Kwock
Matilda W Nicholas
Store-and-Forward Images in Teledermatology: Narrative Literature Review
JMIR Dermatology
title Store-and-Forward Images in Teledermatology: Narrative Literature Review
title_full Store-and-Forward Images in Teledermatology: Narrative Literature Review
title_fullStr Store-and-Forward Images in Teledermatology: Narrative Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Store-and-Forward Images in Teledermatology: Narrative Literature Review
title_short Store-and-Forward Images in Teledermatology: Narrative Literature Review
title_sort store and forward images in teledermatology narrative literature review
url https://derma.jmir.org/2022/3/e37517
work_keys_str_mv AT simonwjiang storeandforwardimagesinteledermatologynarrativeliteraturereview
AT michaelsethflynn storeandforwardimagesinteledermatologynarrativeliteraturereview
AT jefferytkwock storeandforwardimagesinteledermatologynarrativeliteraturereview
AT matildawnicholas storeandforwardimagesinteledermatologynarrativeliteraturereview