Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of light cure glass ionomer cement and light cure composite as coronal sealing material: An in vitro study
Aim: To compare and evaluate the sealing ability of light cure composite and light cure GIC as coronal sealing materials. Materials and Methods: 30 extracted human teeth were divided into three experimental groups of 10 teeth each. The teeth in group I are obturated without coronal seal, teeth in gr...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2017-01-01
|
| Series: | Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.jicdro.org/article.asp?issn=2231-0754;year=2017;volume=9;issue=1;spage=12;epage=15;aulast=Jaiswal |
| _version_ | 1829498578765086720 |
|---|---|
| author | Pragya Jaiswal Aditi Jain Mahesh Motlani Gunjan Agarwal Vaibhav Sharma Apoorva Bhatnagar |
| author_facet | Pragya Jaiswal Aditi Jain Mahesh Motlani Gunjan Agarwal Vaibhav Sharma Apoorva Bhatnagar |
| author_sort | Pragya Jaiswal |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Aim: To compare and evaluate the sealing ability of light cure composite and light cure GIC as coronal sealing materials. Materials and Methods: 30 extracted human teeth were divided into three experimental groups of 10 teeth each. The teeth in group I are obturated without coronal seal, teeth in group II are obturated with light cure GIC (3M ESPE VITREMER) as coronal seal and teeth in group III are obturated with light cure composite(3M ESPE filtek z250) as coronal seal, after removing 2mm of coronal gutta percha. These teeth (crown portion) are then suspended in methylene blue, sealed and kept for 72 hours, to observe the amount of dye penetration. After 72 hours teeth were removed, washed under running water, dried and sectioned longitudinally, separating buccal and lingual halves. The linear extent of dye penetration was measured from cavosurface margin of the access cavity to the most apical extent of dye penetration point. The length from the cavosurface margin to the apex of the tooth was also measured and percentage linear micro leakage was estimated. Statistical Analysis: Data was statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Post-Hoc Multiple comparison (Bonferroni). Results: In the present study specimens in group I showed the maximum percentage of linear microleakage of 31.51 percent. The specimens in group II showed the minimal amount of linear micro leakage of 6.49 percent. Conclusion: It can be concluded coronal seal reduces the micro leakage, and light cure GIC has better coronal sealing ability. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-16T08:16:18Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f62a58d8950f4106a6e9b0f13aa7ede4 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2231-0754 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-16T08:16:18Z |
| publishDate | 2017-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization |
| spelling | doaj.art-f62a58d8950f4106a6e9b0f13aa7ede42022-12-21T22:38:14ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization2231-07542017-01-0191121510.4103/2231-0754.203047Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of light cure glass ionomer cement and light cure composite as coronal sealing material: An in vitro studyPragya JaiswalAditi JainMahesh MotlaniGunjan AgarwalVaibhav SharmaApoorva BhatnagarAim: To compare and evaluate the sealing ability of light cure composite and light cure GIC as coronal sealing materials. Materials and Methods: 30 extracted human teeth were divided into three experimental groups of 10 teeth each. The teeth in group I are obturated without coronal seal, teeth in group II are obturated with light cure GIC (3M ESPE VITREMER) as coronal seal and teeth in group III are obturated with light cure composite(3M ESPE filtek z250) as coronal seal, after removing 2mm of coronal gutta percha. These teeth (crown portion) are then suspended in methylene blue, sealed and kept for 72 hours, to observe the amount of dye penetration. After 72 hours teeth were removed, washed under running water, dried and sectioned longitudinally, separating buccal and lingual halves. The linear extent of dye penetration was measured from cavosurface margin of the access cavity to the most apical extent of dye penetration point. The length from the cavosurface margin to the apex of the tooth was also measured and percentage linear micro leakage was estimated. Statistical Analysis: Data was statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Post-Hoc Multiple comparison (Bonferroni). Results: In the present study specimens in group I showed the maximum percentage of linear microleakage of 31.51 percent. The specimens in group II showed the minimal amount of linear micro leakage of 6.49 percent. Conclusion: It can be concluded coronal seal reduces the micro leakage, and light cure GIC has better coronal sealing ability.http://www.jicdro.org/article.asp?issn=2231-0754;year=2017;volume=9;issue=1;spage=12;epage=15;aulast=JaiswalCoronal sealmethylene bluemicroleakagelight cure GIClight cure composite |
| spellingShingle | Pragya Jaiswal Aditi Jain Mahesh Motlani Gunjan Agarwal Vaibhav Sharma Apoorva Bhatnagar Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of light cure glass ionomer cement and light cure composite as coronal sealing material: An in vitro study Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization Coronal seal methylene blue microleakage light cure GIC light cure composite |
| title | Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of light cure glass ionomer cement and light cure composite as coronal sealing material: An in vitro study |
| title_full | Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of light cure glass ionomer cement and light cure composite as coronal sealing material: An in vitro study |
| title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of light cure glass ionomer cement and light cure composite as coronal sealing material: An in vitro study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of light cure glass ionomer cement and light cure composite as coronal sealing material: An in vitro study |
| title_short | Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of light cure glass ionomer cement and light cure composite as coronal sealing material: An in vitro study |
| title_sort | comparative evaluation of sealing ability of light cure glass ionomer cement and light cure composite as coronal sealing material an in vitro study |
| topic | Coronal seal methylene blue microleakage light cure GIC light cure composite |
| url | http://www.jicdro.org/article.asp?issn=2231-0754;year=2017;volume=9;issue=1;spage=12;epage=15;aulast=Jaiswal |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pragyajaiswal comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityoflightcureglassionomercementandlightcurecompositeascoronalsealingmaterialaninvitrostudy AT aditijain comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityoflightcureglassionomercementandlightcurecompositeascoronalsealingmaterialaninvitrostudy AT maheshmotlani comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityoflightcureglassionomercementandlightcurecompositeascoronalsealingmaterialaninvitrostudy AT gunjanagarwal comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityoflightcureglassionomercementandlightcurecompositeascoronalsealingmaterialaninvitrostudy AT vaibhavsharma comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityoflightcureglassionomercementandlightcurecompositeascoronalsealingmaterialaninvitrostudy AT apoorvabhatnagar comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityoflightcureglassionomercementandlightcurecompositeascoronalsealingmaterialaninvitrostudy |