Ethical Evaluation of Pharmaceutical Marketing in Sana’a City, Yemen

Objectives: To evaluate the ethics of pharmaceutical marketing practices in Sana’a city, Yemen. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 400 physicians and 50 pharmaceutical companies in the period from March to August 2018. Data about pharmaceutical marketing ethics were collected fr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gamil Q. Othman, Abdulsalam M. Halboup, Mohammed M. Battah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Science and Technology, Yemen 2021-02-01
Series:Yemeni Journal for Medical Sciences
Online Access:https://journals.ust.edu/index.php/yjms/article/view/1721
_version_ 1818547143814676480
author Gamil Q. Othman
Abdulsalam M. Halboup
Mohammed M. Battah
author_facet Gamil Q. Othman
Abdulsalam M. Halboup
Mohammed M. Battah
author_sort Gamil Q. Othman
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: To evaluate the ethics of pharmaceutical marketing practices in Sana’a city, Yemen. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 400 physicians and 50 pharmaceutical companies in the period from March to August 2018. Data about pharmaceutical marketing ethics were collected from physicians and pharmaceutical companies using two types of self-administrated, structured questionnaires. Data were analyzed with appropriate statistical tests using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 21.0. Results: The majority of physicians (60.0%) agreed that medical samples had been used most frequently as a promotional tool for pharmaceutical marketing, followed by gifts (14.0%). More than half of physicians were satisfied with the way of pharmaceutical marketing in Yemen. Personal relationships and medical samples and gifts were the factors affecting their prescriptions, being reported by about a third of physicians each. Meanwhile, most physicians (44.0%) preferred medical conferences and exhibitions as a promotional benefit to be gotten for prescribing the company’s products. The majority of physicians (62.0%) agreed that the availability of medical samples affect their prescriptions, and about 28.2% of physicians reported that all medical samples are used by their patients. Most physicians (37.0%) perceived that only 50% of medical representatives respond well to their queries related to marketed drugs, and 41.5% of physicians agreed that global companies are more compliant with ethical marketing. About 60% of the physicians reported not facing unethical promotions, and the majority (54.0%) agreed that unethical pharmaceutical marketing is the responsibility of companies, physicians, and representatives. There was a statistically significant difference in the proportion of drug prescriptions affected by medical representative visits and availability of medical samples on prescription in relation to the work experience of physicians. On the other hand, there was a statistically significant difference in facing an unethical promotion offered by companies for prescribing their products and the attribution of unethical pharmaceutical marketing in relation to the type of medical profession of physicians. Conclusions: Pharmaceutical marketing in Yemen still depends on traditional tools, with the lack of ethical guidelines or codes for pharmaceutical marketing in the country. Work experience and medical profession of physicians can significantly affect pharmaceutical marketing. The spread of unethical marketing is the responsibility of pharmaceutical companies, physicians and medical representatives. Therefore, it is recommended to develop well-defined and updated ethical standards and national guidelines for pharmaceutical marketing by the Ministry of Public Health and Population. Furthermore, official campaigns should be regularly carried out to control and restrict unethical promotion. Further studies on the ethics of pharmaceutical marketing are also recommended. Pharmaceutical companies should continuously train their medical representatives and provide physicians with the latest medical knowledge about new drugs. Keywords: Pharmaceutical marketing, Ethics, IFPMA guidelines, Sana’a
first_indexed 2024-12-12T08:02:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f6364f3b556e4350b9d83b4a5f1fe4b7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-9601
2227-961X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T08:02:46Z
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher University of Science and Technology, Yemen
record_format Article
series Yemeni Journal for Medical Sciences
spelling doaj.art-f6364f3b556e4350b9d83b4a5f1fe4b72022-12-22T00:32:05ZengUniversity of Science and Technology, YemenYemeni Journal for Medical Sciences2227-96012227-961X2021-02-01141132110.20428/YJMS.14.1.A31499Ethical Evaluation of Pharmaceutical Marketing in Sana’a City, YemenGamil Q. Othman0Abdulsalam M. Halboup1Mohammed M. Battah2Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Science and Technology, Sana’a, YemenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Science and Technology, Sana’a, Yemen Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Science and Technology, Sana’a, YemenObjectives: To evaluate the ethics of pharmaceutical marketing practices in Sana’a city, Yemen. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 400 physicians and 50 pharmaceutical companies in the period from March to August 2018. Data about pharmaceutical marketing ethics were collected from physicians and pharmaceutical companies using two types of self-administrated, structured questionnaires. Data were analyzed with appropriate statistical tests using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 21.0. Results: The majority of physicians (60.0%) agreed that medical samples had been used most frequently as a promotional tool for pharmaceutical marketing, followed by gifts (14.0%). More than half of physicians were satisfied with the way of pharmaceutical marketing in Yemen. Personal relationships and medical samples and gifts were the factors affecting their prescriptions, being reported by about a third of physicians each. Meanwhile, most physicians (44.0%) preferred medical conferences and exhibitions as a promotional benefit to be gotten for prescribing the company’s products. The majority of physicians (62.0%) agreed that the availability of medical samples affect their prescriptions, and about 28.2% of physicians reported that all medical samples are used by their patients. Most physicians (37.0%) perceived that only 50% of medical representatives respond well to their queries related to marketed drugs, and 41.5% of physicians agreed that global companies are more compliant with ethical marketing. About 60% of the physicians reported not facing unethical promotions, and the majority (54.0%) agreed that unethical pharmaceutical marketing is the responsibility of companies, physicians, and representatives. There was a statistically significant difference in the proportion of drug prescriptions affected by medical representative visits and availability of medical samples on prescription in relation to the work experience of physicians. On the other hand, there was a statistically significant difference in facing an unethical promotion offered by companies for prescribing their products and the attribution of unethical pharmaceutical marketing in relation to the type of medical profession of physicians. Conclusions: Pharmaceutical marketing in Yemen still depends on traditional tools, with the lack of ethical guidelines or codes for pharmaceutical marketing in the country. Work experience and medical profession of physicians can significantly affect pharmaceutical marketing. The spread of unethical marketing is the responsibility of pharmaceutical companies, physicians and medical representatives. Therefore, it is recommended to develop well-defined and updated ethical standards and national guidelines for pharmaceutical marketing by the Ministry of Public Health and Population. Furthermore, official campaigns should be regularly carried out to control and restrict unethical promotion. Further studies on the ethics of pharmaceutical marketing are also recommended. Pharmaceutical companies should continuously train their medical representatives and provide physicians with the latest medical knowledge about new drugs. Keywords: Pharmaceutical marketing, Ethics, IFPMA guidelines, Sana’ahttps://journals.ust.edu/index.php/yjms/article/view/1721
spellingShingle Gamil Q. Othman
Abdulsalam M. Halboup
Mohammed M. Battah
Ethical Evaluation of Pharmaceutical Marketing in Sana’a City, Yemen
Yemeni Journal for Medical Sciences
title Ethical Evaluation of Pharmaceutical Marketing in Sana’a City, Yemen
title_full Ethical Evaluation of Pharmaceutical Marketing in Sana’a City, Yemen
title_fullStr Ethical Evaluation of Pharmaceutical Marketing in Sana’a City, Yemen
title_full_unstemmed Ethical Evaluation of Pharmaceutical Marketing in Sana’a City, Yemen
title_short Ethical Evaluation of Pharmaceutical Marketing in Sana’a City, Yemen
title_sort ethical evaluation of pharmaceutical marketing in sana a city yemen
url https://journals.ust.edu/index.php/yjms/article/view/1721
work_keys_str_mv AT gamilqothman ethicalevaluationofpharmaceuticalmarketinginsanaacityyemen
AT abdulsalammhalboup ethicalevaluationofpharmaceuticalmarketinginsanaacityyemen
AT mohammedmbattah ethicalevaluationofpharmaceuticalmarketinginsanaacityyemen