Avoiding negative outcomes: tracking the mechanisms of avoidance learning in humans during fear conditioning

Previous research across species has shown that the amygdala is critical for learning about aversive outcomes, while the striatum is involved in reward-related processing. Less is known, however, about the role of the amygdala and the striatum in learning how to exert control over emotions and avoi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mauricio R Delgado, Rita L Jou, Joe LeDoux, Liz Phelps
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2009-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/neuro.08.033.2009/full
_version_ 1819023170361884672
author Mauricio R Delgado
Rita L Jou
Joe LeDoux
Liz Phelps
Liz Phelps
author_facet Mauricio R Delgado
Rita L Jou
Joe LeDoux
Liz Phelps
Liz Phelps
author_sort Mauricio R Delgado
collection DOAJ
description Previous research across species has shown that the amygdala is critical for learning about aversive outcomes, while the striatum is involved in reward-related processing. Less is known, however, about the role of the amygdala and the striatum in learning how to exert control over emotions and avoid negative outcomes. One potential mechanism for active avoidance of stressful situations is postulated to involve amygdala-striatal interactions. The goal of this study was to investigate the physiological and neural correlates underlying avoidance learning in humans. Specifically, we used a classical conditioning paradigm where three different conditioned stimuli (CS) were presented. One stimulus predicted the delivery of a shock upon stimulus offset (CS+), while another predicted no negative consequences (CS-). A third conditioned cue also predicted delivery of a shock, but participants were instructed that upon seeing this stimulus, they could avoid the shock if they chose the correct action (AV +). After successful learning, participants could then easily terminate the shock during subsequent stimulus presentations (AV-). Physiological responses (as measured by SCRs) confirmed a main effect of conditioning, particularly showing higher arousal responses during pre (AV+) compared to post (AV-) learning of an avoidance response. Consistent with animal models, amygdala-striatal interactions were observed to underlie the acquisition of an avoidance response. These results support a mechanism of active coping with conditioned fear that allows for the control over emotional responses such as fears that can become maladaptive and influence our decision-making.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T04:34:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f63956211ed44e71939a647998c8440b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5153
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T04:34:38Z
publishDate 2009-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-f63956211ed44e71939a647998c8440b2022-12-21T19:15:53ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience1662-51532009-11-01310.3389/neuro.08.033.2009765Avoiding negative outcomes: tracking the mechanisms of avoidance learning in humans during fear conditioningMauricio R Delgado0Rita L Jou1Joe LeDoux2Liz Phelps3Liz Phelps4Rutgers UniversityNew York UniversityNew York UniversityNew York UniversityNew York UniversityPrevious research across species has shown that the amygdala is critical for learning about aversive outcomes, while the striatum is involved in reward-related processing. Less is known, however, about the role of the amygdala and the striatum in learning how to exert control over emotions and avoid negative outcomes. One potential mechanism for active avoidance of stressful situations is postulated to involve amygdala-striatal interactions. The goal of this study was to investigate the physiological and neural correlates underlying avoidance learning in humans. Specifically, we used a classical conditioning paradigm where three different conditioned stimuli (CS) were presented. One stimulus predicted the delivery of a shock upon stimulus offset (CS+), while another predicted no negative consequences (CS-). A third conditioned cue also predicted delivery of a shock, but participants were instructed that upon seeing this stimulus, they could avoid the shock if they chose the correct action (AV +). After successful learning, participants could then easily terminate the shock during subsequent stimulus presentations (AV-). Physiological responses (as measured by SCRs) confirmed a main effect of conditioning, particularly showing higher arousal responses during pre (AV+) compared to post (AV-) learning of an avoidance response. Consistent with animal models, amygdala-striatal interactions were observed to underlie the acquisition of an avoidance response. These results support a mechanism of active coping with conditioned fear that allows for the control over emotional responses such as fears that can become maladaptive and influence our decision-making.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/neuro.08.033.2009/fullPunishmentfMRIRewardinstrumental conditioningdorsal striatumExpression
spellingShingle Mauricio R Delgado
Rita L Jou
Joe LeDoux
Liz Phelps
Liz Phelps
Avoiding negative outcomes: tracking the mechanisms of avoidance learning in humans during fear conditioning
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Punishment
fMRI
Reward
instrumental conditioning
dorsal striatum
Expression
title Avoiding negative outcomes: tracking the mechanisms of avoidance learning in humans during fear conditioning
title_full Avoiding negative outcomes: tracking the mechanisms of avoidance learning in humans during fear conditioning
title_fullStr Avoiding negative outcomes: tracking the mechanisms of avoidance learning in humans during fear conditioning
title_full_unstemmed Avoiding negative outcomes: tracking the mechanisms of avoidance learning in humans during fear conditioning
title_short Avoiding negative outcomes: tracking the mechanisms of avoidance learning in humans during fear conditioning
title_sort avoiding negative outcomes tracking the mechanisms of avoidance learning in humans during fear conditioning
topic Punishment
fMRI
Reward
instrumental conditioning
dorsal striatum
Expression
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/neuro.08.033.2009/full
work_keys_str_mv AT mauriciordelgado avoidingnegativeoutcomestrackingthemechanismsofavoidancelearninginhumansduringfearconditioning
AT ritaljou avoidingnegativeoutcomestrackingthemechanismsofavoidancelearninginhumansduringfearconditioning
AT joeledoux avoidingnegativeoutcomestrackingthemechanismsofavoidancelearninginhumansduringfearconditioning
AT lizphelps avoidingnegativeoutcomestrackingthemechanismsofavoidancelearninginhumansduringfearconditioning
AT lizphelps avoidingnegativeoutcomestrackingthemechanismsofavoidancelearninginhumansduringfearconditioning