Neuropsychological assessment methodology revisited: metatheoretical reflections
Theory building in neuropsychology, similar to other disciplines, rests on metatheoretical assumptions of philosophical origin. Such assumptions regarding the relation of psychological and physiological variables influence research methodologies as well as assessment strategies in fields of applicat...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023-11-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1170283/full |
| _version_ | 1797612237301481472 |
|---|---|
| author | Josh Joseph Ramminger Josh Joseph Ramminger Martin Peper Alexander Nicolai Wendt Alexander Nicolai Wendt |
| author_facet | Josh Joseph Ramminger Josh Joseph Ramminger Martin Peper Alexander Nicolai Wendt Alexander Nicolai Wendt |
| author_sort | Josh Joseph Ramminger |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Theory building in neuropsychology, similar to other disciplines, rests on metatheoretical assumptions of philosophical origin. Such assumptions regarding the relation of psychological and physiological variables influence research methodologies as well as assessment strategies in fields of application. Here, we revisit the classic procedure of Double Dissociation (DD) to illustrate the connection of metatheory and methodology. In a seemingly unbridgeable opposition, the classical neuropsychological procedure of DD can be understood as either presupposing localizationism and a modular view of the brain, or as a special case of the generalized neuro-lens model for neuropsychological assessment. In the latter case, it is more easily compatible with a perspective that emphasizes the systemic-network, rather than the modular, nature of the brain, which as part of the organism, proportionately mediates the situatedness of the human being in the world. This perspective not only makes it possible to structure ecological validation processes and give them a metatheoretical foundation, but also to interlace it with the phenomenological insight that the laboratory as one context of empirical research may be analyzed in terms of situated experience. We conclude with showing that both the localizationist and the system science approach can agree on a view of the brain as a dynamical network, and that metatheory may thus offer important new perspectives of reconciliation. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T06:39:26Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f641b11223694a1fafac3037fc21e48e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1664-1078 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T06:39:26Z |
| publishDate | 2023-11-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Psychology |
| spelling | doaj.art-f641b11223694a1fafac3037fc21e48e2023-11-17T10:44:17ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782023-11-011410.3389/fpsyg.2023.11702831170283Neuropsychological assessment methodology revisited: metatheoretical reflectionsJosh Joseph Ramminger0Josh Joseph Ramminger1Martin Peper2Alexander Nicolai Wendt3Alexander Nicolai Wendt4Department of Psychology, University of Marburg, Marburg, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Psychology, University of Marburg, Marburg, GermanyFaculty of Psychology, Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, AustriaDepartment of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, GermanyTheory building in neuropsychology, similar to other disciplines, rests on metatheoretical assumptions of philosophical origin. Such assumptions regarding the relation of psychological and physiological variables influence research methodologies as well as assessment strategies in fields of application. Here, we revisit the classic procedure of Double Dissociation (DD) to illustrate the connection of metatheory and methodology. In a seemingly unbridgeable opposition, the classical neuropsychological procedure of DD can be understood as either presupposing localizationism and a modular view of the brain, or as a special case of the generalized neuro-lens model for neuropsychological assessment. In the latter case, it is more easily compatible with a perspective that emphasizes the systemic-network, rather than the modular, nature of the brain, which as part of the organism, proportionately mediates the situatedness of the human being in the world. This perspective not only makes it possible to structure ecological validation processes and give them a metatheoretical foundation, but also to interlace it with the phenomenological insight that the laboratory as one context of empirical research may be analyzed in terms of situated experience. We conclude with showing that both the localizationist and the system science approach can agree on a view of the brain as a dynamical network, and that metatheory may thus offer important new perspectives of reconciliation.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1170283/fullneuropsychological assessmentlense model paradigm in neuropsychologyphilosophy of sciencephenomenological psychologymetatheoryecological validity |
| spellingShingle | Josh Joseph Ramminger Josh Joseph Ramminger Martin Peper Alexander Nicolai Wendt Alexander Nicolai Wendt Neuropsychological assessment methodology revisited: metatheoretical reflections Frontiers in Psychology neuropsychological assessment lense model paradigm in neuropsychology philosophy of science phenomenological psychology metatheory ecological validity |
| title | Neuropsychological assessment methodology revisited: metatheoretical reflections |
| title_full | Neuropsychological assessment methodology revisited: metatheoretical reflections |
| title_fullStr | Neuropsychological assessment methodology revisited: metatheoretical reflections |
| title_full_unstemmed | Neuropsychological assessment methodology revisited: metatheoretical reflections |
| title_short | Neuropsychological assessment methodology revisited: metatheoretical reflections |
| title_sort | neuropsychological assessment methodology revisited metatheoretical reflections |
| topic | neuropsychological assessment lense model paradigm in neuropsychology philosophy of science phenomenological psychology metatheory ecological validity |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1170283/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT joshjosephramminger neuropsychologicalassessmentmethodologyrevisitedmetatheoreticalreflections AT joshjosephramminger neuropsychologicalassessmentmethodologyrevisitedmetatheoreticalreflections AT martinpeper neuropsychologicalassessmentmethodologyrevisitedmetatheoreticalreflections AT alexandernicolaiwendt neuropsychologicalassessmentmethodologyrevisitedmetatheoreticalreflections AT alexandernicolaiwendt neuropsychologicalassessmentmethodologyrevisitedmetatheoreticalreflections |