Assessing changes in clusters of wildlife road mortalities after the construction of wildlife mitigation structures

Abstract Collisions with vehicles can be a major threat to wildlife populations, so wildlife mitigation structures, including exclusionary fencing and wildlife crossings, are often constructed. To assess mitigation structure effectiveness, it is useful to compare wildlife road mortalities (WRMs) bef...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas J. Yamashita, Trinity D. Livingston, Kevin W. Ryer, John H. Young Jr., Richard J. Kline
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-10-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8053
_version_ 1818931985296392192
author Thomas J. Yamashita
Trinity D. Livingston
Kevin W. Ryer
John H. Young Jr.
Richard J. Kline
author_facet Thomas J. Yamashita
Trinity D. Livingston
Kevin W. Ryer
John H. Young Jr.
Richard J. Kline
author_sort Thomas J. Yamashita
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Collisions with vehicles can be a major threat to wildlife populations, so wildlife mitigation structures, including exclusionary fencing and wildlife crossings, are often constructed. To assess mitigation structure effectiveness, it is useful to compare wildlife road mortalities (WRMs) before, during, and after mitigation structure construction; however, differences in survey methodologies may make comparisons of counts impractical. Location‐based cluster analyses provide a means to assess how WRM spatial patterns have changed over time. We collected WRM data between 2015 and 2019 on State Highway 100 in Texas, USA. Five wildlife crossings and exclusionary fencing were installed in this area between September 2016 and May 2018 for the endangered ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) and other similarly sized mammals. Roads intersecting State Highway 100 were mitigated by gates, wildlife guards, and wing walls. However, these structures may have provided wildlife access to the highway. We combined local hot spot analysis and time series analysis to assess how WRM cluster intensity changed after mitigation structure construction at fine spatial and temporal scales and generalized linear regression to assess how gaps in fencing and land cover were related to WRM cluster intensity in the before, during, and after construction periods. Overall, WRMs/survey day decreased after mitigation structure construction and most hot spots occurred where there were more fence gaps, and, while cluster intensity increased in a few locations, these were not at fence gaps. Cluster intensity of WRMs increased when nearer to fence gaps in naturally vegetated areas, especially forested areas, and decreased nearer to fence gaps in areas with less natural vegetation. We recommend that if fence gaps are necessary in forested areas, less permeable mitigation structures, such as gates, should be used. Local hot spot analysis, coupled with time series and regression techniques, can effectively assess how WRM clustering changes over time.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T04:25:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f64d5073d0ff4be587a88d98fdfbfeab
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7758
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T04:25:17Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Ecology and Evolution
spelling doaj.art-f64d5073d0ff4be587a88d98fdfbfeab2022-12-21T19:53:32ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582021-10-011119133051332010.1002/ece3.8053Assessing changes in clusters of wildlife road mortalities after the construction of wildlife mitigation structuresThomas J. Yamashita0Trinity D. Livingston1Kevin W. Ryer2John H. Young Jr.3Richard J. Kline4School of Earth, Environmental, and Marine Sciences University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Port Isabel TX USASchool of Earth, Environmental, and Marine Sciences University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Port Isabel TX USASchool of Earth, Environmental, and Marine Sciences University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Port Isabel TX USAEnvironmental Affairs Division Texas Department of Transportation Austin TX USASchool of Earth, Environmental, and Marine Sciences University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Port Isabel TX USAAbstract Collisions with vehicles can be a major threat to wildlife populations, so wildlife mitigation structures, including exclusionary fencing and wildlife crossings, are often constructed. To assess mitigation structure effectiveness, it is useful to compare wildlife road mortalities (WRMs) before, during, and after mitigation structure construction; however, differences in survey methodologies may make comparisons of counts impractical. Location‐based cluster analyses provide a means to assess how WRM spatial patterns have changed over time. We collected WRM data between 2015 and 2019 on State Highway 100 in Texas, USA. Five wildlife crossings and exclusionary fencing were installed in this area between September 2016 and May 2018 for the endangered ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) and other similarly sized mammals. Roads intersecting State Highway 100 were mitigated by gates, wildlife guards, and wing walls. However, these structures may have provided wildlife access to the highway. We combined local hot spot analysis and time series analysis to assess how WRM cluster intensity changed after mitigation structure construction at fine spatial and temporal scales and generalized linear regression to assess how gaps in fencing and land cover were related to WRM cluster intensity in the before, during, and after construction periods. Overall, WRMs/survey day decreased after mitigation structure construction and most hot spots occurred where there were more fence gaps, and, while cluster intensity increased in a few locations, these were not at fence gaps. Cluster intensity of WRMs increased when nearer to fence gaps in naturally vegetated areas, especially forested areas, and decreased nearer to fence gaps in areas with less natural vegetation. We recommend that if fence gaps are necessary in forested areas, less permeable mitigation structures, such as gates, should be used. Local hot spot analysis, coupled with time series and regression techniques, can effectively assess how WRM clustering changes over time.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8053local hot spot analysisMann–Kendall testroad ecologywildlife mitigation structureswildlife road mortality
spellingShingle Thomas J. Yamashita
Trinity D. Livingston
Kevin W. Ryer
John H. Young Jr.
Richard J. Kline
Assessing changes in clusters of wildlife road mortalities after the construction of wildlife mitigation structures
Ecology and Evolution
local hot spot analysis
Mann–Kendall test
road ecology
wildlife mitigation structures
wildlife road mortality
title Assessing changes in clusters of wildlife road mortalities after the construction of wildlife mitigation structures
title_full Assessing changes in clusters of wildlife road mortalities after the construction of wildlife mitigation structures
title_fullStr Assessing changes in clusters of wildlife road mortalities after the construction of wildlife mitigation structures
title_full_unstemmed Assessing changes in clusters of wildlife road mortalities after the construction of wildlife mitigation structures
title_short Assessing changes in clusters of wildlife road mortalities after the construction of wildlife mitigation structures
title_sort assessing changes in clusters of wildlife road mortalities after the construction of wildlife mitigation structures
topic local hot spot analysis
Mann–Kendall test
road ecology
wildlife mitigation structures
wildlife road mortality
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8053
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasjyamashita assessingchangesinclustersofwildliferoadmortalitiesaftertheconstructionofwildlifemitigationstructures
AT trinitydlivingston assessingchangesinclustersofwildliferoadmortalitiesaftertheconstructionofwildlifemitigationstructures
AT kevinwryer assessingchangesinclustersofwildliferoadmortalitiesaftertheconstructionofwildlifemitigationstructures
AT johnhyoungjr assessingchangesinclustersofwildliferoadmortalitiesaftertheconstructionofwildlifemitigationstructures
AT richardjkline assessingchangesinclustersofwildliferoadmortalitiesaftertheconstructionofwildlifemitigationstructures