Novel Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis and Related Neoplasms

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibition forms the cornerstone of the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF), and the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib is often used as a second-line agent in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who fail hydroxyurea (HU). In addition, ruxolitinib continues to be studied in patients with esse...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Prithviraj Bose, Lucia Masarova, Srdan Verstovsek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-10-01
Series:Cancers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/10/2891
_version_ 1797551525479841792
author Prithviraj Bose
Lucia Masarova
Srdan Verstovsek
author_facet Prithviraj Bose
Lucia Masarova
Srdan Verstovsek
author_sort Prithviraj Bose
collection DOAJ
description Janus kinase (JAK) inhibition forms the cornerstone of the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF), and the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib is often used as a second-line agent in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who fail hydroxyurea (HU). In addition, ruxolitinib continues to be studied in patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET). The benefits of JAK inhibition in terms of splenomegaly and symptoms in patients with MF are undeniable, and ruxolitinib prolongs the survival of persons with higher risk MF. Despite this, however, “disease-modifying” effects of JAK inhibitors in MF, i.e., bone marrow fibrosis and mutant allele burden reduction, are limited. Similarly, in HU-resistant/intolerant PV, while ruxolitinib provides excellent control of the hematocrit, symptoms and splenomegaly, reduction in the rate of thromboembolic events has not been convincingly demonstrated. Furthermore, JAK inhibitors do not prevent disease evolution to MF or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Frontline cytoreductive therapy for PV generally comprises HU and interferons, which have their own limitations. Numerous novel agents, representing diverse mechanisms of action, are in development for the treatment of these three classic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). JAK inhibitor-based combinations, all of which are currently under study for MF, have been covered elsewhere in this issue. In this article, we focus on agents that have been studied as monotherapy in patients with MF, generally after JAK inhibitor resistance/intolerance, as well as several novel compounds in development for PV/ET.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T15:47:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f65e4618ec154327b49c936991cb0ea4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-6694
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T15:47:20Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Cancers
spelling doaj.art-f65e4618ec154327b49c936991cb0ea42023-11-20T16:25:56ZengMDPI AGCancers2072-66942020-10-011210289110.3390/cancers12102891Novel Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis and Related NeoplasmsPrithviraj Bose0Lucia Masarova1Srdan Verstovsek2Department of Leukemia, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Leukemia, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USADepartment of Leukemia, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USAJanus kinase (JAK) inhibition forms the cornerstone of the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF), and the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib is often used as a second-line agent in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who fail hydroxyurea (HU). In addition, ruxolitinib continues to be studied in patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET). The benefits of JAK inhibition in terms of splenomegaly and symptoms in patients with MF are undeniable, and ruxolitinib prolongs the survival of persons with higher risk MF. Despite this, however, “disease-modifying” effects of JAK inhibitors in MF, i.e., bone marrow fibrosis and mutant allele burden reduction, are limited. Similarly, in HU-resistant/intolerant PV, while ruxolitinib provides excellent control of the hematocrit, symptoms and splenomegaly, reduction in the rate of thromboembolic events has not been convincingly demonstrated. Furthermore, JAK inhibitors do not prevent disease evolution to MF or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Frontline cytoreductive therapy for PV generally comprises HU and interferons, which have their own limitations. Numerous novel agents, representing diverse mechanisms of action, are in development for the treatment of these three classic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). JAK inhibitor-based combinations, all of which are currently under study for MF, have been covered elsewhere in this issue. In this article, we focus on agents that have been studied as monotherapy in patients with MF, generally after JAK inhibitor resistance/intolerance, as well as several novel compounds in development for PV/ET.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/10/2891imetelstatPRM-151KRT-232CPI-0610ropeginterferon alfa-2b
spellingShingle Prithviraj Bose
Lucia Masarova
Srdan Verstovsek
Novel Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis and Related Neoplasms
Cancers
imetelstat
PRM-151
KRT-232
CPI-0610
ropeginterferon alfa-2b
title Novel Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis and Related Neoplasms
title_full Novel Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis and Related Neoplasms
title_fullStr Novel Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis and Related Neoplasms
title_full_unstemmed Novel Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis and Related Neoplasms
title_short Novel Concepts of Treatment for Patients with Myelofibrosis and Related Neoplasms
title_sort novel concepts of treatment for patients with myelofibrosis and related neoplasms
topic imetelstat
PRM-151
KRT-232
CPI-0610
ropeginterferon alfa-2b
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/10/2891
work_keys_str_mv AT prithvirajbose novelconceptsoftreatmentforpatientswithmyelofibrosisandrelatedneoplasms
AT luciamasarova novelconceptsoftreatmentforpatientswithmyelofibrosisandrelatedneoplasms
AT srdanverstovsek novelconceptsoftreatmentforpatientswithmyelofibrosisandrelatedneoplasms