On Formalisms and Interpretations
One of the reasons for the heated debates around the interpretations of quantum theory is a simple confusion between the notions of formalism $\textit{versus}$ interpretation. In this note, we make a clear distinction between them and show that there are actually two $\textit{inequivalent}$ quantum...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Verein zur Förderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften
2018-10-01
|
Series: | Quantum |
Online Access: | https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2018-10-15-99/pdf/ |
_version_ | 1811266922039214080 |
---|---|
author | Veronika Baumann Stefan Wolf |
author_facet | Veronika Baumann Stefan Wolf |
author_sort | Veronika Baumann |
collection | DOAJ |
description | One of the reasons for the heated debates around the interpretations of quantum theory is a simple confusion between the notions of formalism $\textit{versus}$ interpretation. In this note, we make a clear distinction between them and show that there are actually two $\textit{inequivalent}$ quantum formalisms, namely the relative-state formalism and the standard formalism with the Born and measurement-update rules. We further propose a different probability rule for the relative-state formalism and discuss how Wigner's-friend-type experiments could show the inequivalence with the standard formalism. The feasibility in principle of such experiments, however, remains an open question. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T20:53:07Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f6781b941e4244f88c2aacb9355e99b3 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2521-327X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T20:53:07Z |
publishDate | 2018-10-01 |
publisher | Verein zur Förderung des Open Access Publizierens in den Quantenwissenschaften |
record_format | Article |
series | Quantum |
spelling | doaj.art-f6781b941e4244f88c2aacb9355e99b32022-12-22T03:17:05ZengVerein zur Förderung des Open Access Publizierens in den QuantenwissenschaftenQuantum2521-327X2018-10-0129910.22331/q-2018-10-15-9910.22331/q-2018-10-15-99On Formalisms and InterpretationsVeronika BaumannStefan WolfOne of the reasons for the heated debates around the interpretations of quantum theory is a simple confusion between the notions of formalism $\textit{versus}$ interpretation. In this note, we make a clear distinction between them and show that there are actually two $\textit{inequivalent}$ quantum formalisms, namely the relative-state formalism and the standard formalism with the Born and measurement-update rules. We further propose a different probability rule for the relative-state formalism and discuss how Wigner's-friend-type experiments could show the inequivalence with the standard formalism. The feasibility in principle of such experiments, however, remains an open question.https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2018-10-15-99/pdf/ |
spellingShingle | Veronika Baumann Stefan Wolf On Formalisms and Interpretations Quantum |
title | On Formalisms and Interpretations |
title_full | On Formalisms and Interpretations |
title_fullStr | On Formalisms and Interpretations |
title_full_unstemmed | On Formalisms and Interpretations |
title_short | On Formalisms and Interpretations |
title_sort | on formalisms and interpretations |
url | https://quantum-journal.org/papers/q-2018-10-15-99/pdf/ |
work_keys_str_mv | AT veronikabaumann onformalismsandinterpretations AT stefanwolf onformalismsandinterpretations |