STUDY OF DEMOTIVATED VS. MOTIVATED EFL LEARNERS PREFERENCES TOWARDS TEACHERS ORAL ERROR CORRECTION

The purpose of this study is to compare the possible differences between demotivated vs. motivated EFL learners preferences toward teachers oral error correction, including the necessity, frequency, timing, type, method, and delivering agent of error correction. To this end, 141 Iranian EFL learners...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rezvan Jafari, Habibollah Mashhadi, Farideh Okati, Roya Movahed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Kuningan 2017-07-01
Series:Indonesian EFL Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/IEFLJ/article/view/662/519
_version_ 1818944877335937024
author Rezvan Jafari
Habibollah Mashhadi
Farideh Okati
Roya Movahed
author_facet Rezvan Jafari
Habibollah Mashhadi
Farideh Okati
Roya Movahed
author_sort Rezvan Jafari
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of this study is to compare the possible differences between demotivated vs. motivated EFL learners preferences toward teachers oral error correction, including the necessity, frequency, timing, type, method, and delivering agent of error correction. To this end, 141 Iranian EFL learners at the departments of foreign language in Zabol and Sistan and Baluchestan universities participated in this study. The learners preferences for error correction questionnaire, the demotivation questionnaire, semi-structured interviews, and classroom observations were used to collect the data. The results of independent sample t-tests indicated that there were no significant differences between the two groups regardless of their demotivation level toward oral error correction. The findings revealed five suggestions: firstly, errors should be corrected and sometimes to be corrected. Secondly, correcting errors after the student finishes speaking was the most appropriate time among the two groups. Thirdly, serious spoken errors that may cause problems in listeners understanding and frequent errors should be corrected more than other errors. Fourthly, elicitation and explicit feedback were the most popular methods of corrective feedback among the two groups. Finally, teachers were the most preferred person to deliver corrective feedback. Furthermore, the results of the observation data showed that what students received as error correction in oral classes were not in line with what students preferred to be corrected. Pedagogical implications for providing oral error correction have also been discussed.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T07:50:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f68544299a1647359f65188fbb016a63
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2252-7427
2541-3635
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T07:50:12Z
publishDate 2017-07-01
publisher Universitas Kuningan
record_format Article
series Indonesian EFL Journal
spelling doaj.art-f68544299a1647359f65188fbb016a632022-12-21T19:47:52ZengUniversitas KuninganIndonesian EFL Journal2252-74272541-36352017-07-013214715810.25134/ieflj.v3i2.662STUDY OF DEMOTIVATED VS. MOTIVATED EFL LEARNERS PREFERENCES TOWARDS TEACHERS ORAL ERROR CORRECTIONRezvan Jafari0Habibollah Mashhadi1Farideh Okati2Roya Movahed3University of ZabolUniversity of ZabolUniversity of ZabolUniversity of ZabolThe purpose of this study is to compare the possible differences between demotivated vs. motivated EFL learners preferences toward teachers oral error correction, including the necessity, frequency, timing, type, method, and delivering agent of error correction. To this end, 141 Iranian EFL learners at the departments of foreign language in Zabol and Sistan and Baluchestan universities participated in this study. The learners preferences for error correction questionnaire, the demotivation questionnaire, semi-structured interviews, and classroom observations were used to collect the data. The results of independent sample t-tests indicated that there were no significant differences between the two groups regardless of their demotivation level toward oral error correction. The findings revealed five suggestions: firstly, errors should be corrected and sometimes to be corrected. Secondly, correcting errors after the student finishes speaking was the most appropriate time among the two groups. Thirdly, serious spoken errors that may cause problems in listeners understanding and frequent errors should be corrected more than other errors. Fourthly, elicitation and explicit feedback were the most popular methods of corrective feedback among the two groups. Finally, teachers were the most preferred person to deliver corrective feedback. Furthermore, the results of the observation data showed that what students received as error correction in oral classes were not in line with what students preferred to be corrected. Pedagogical implications for providing oral error correction have also been discussed.https://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/IEFLJ/article/view/662/519oral corrective feedbackdemotivated learnersmotivated learnerspreferencesEFL learners
spellingShingle Rezvan Jafari
Habibollah Mashhadi
Farideh Okati
Roya Movahed
STUDY OF DEMOTIVATED VS. MOTIVATED EFL LEARNERS PREFERENCES TOWARDS TEACHERS ORAL ERROR CORRECTION
Indonesian EFL Journal
oral corrective feedback
demotivated learners
motivated learners
preferences
EFL learners
title STUDY OF DEMOTIVATED VS. MOTIVATED EFL LEARNERS PREFERENCES TOWARDS TEACHERS ORAL ERROR CORRECTION
title_full STUDY OF DEMOTIVATED VS. MOTIVATED EFL LEARNERS PREFERENCES TOWARDS TEACHERS ORAL ERROR CORRECTION
title_fullStr STUDY OF DEMOTIVATED VS. MOTIVATED EFL LEARNERS PREFERENCES TOWARDS TEACHERS ORAL ERROR CORRECTION
title_full_unstemmed STUDY OF DEMOTIVATED VS. MOTIVATED EFL LEARNERS PREFERENCES TOWARDS TEACHERS ORAL ERROR CORRECTION
title_short STUDY OF DEMOTIVATED VS. MOTIVATED EFL LEARNERS PREFERENCES TOWARDS TEACHERS ORAL ERROR CORRECTION
title_sort study of demotivated vs motivated efl learners preferences towards teachers oral error correction
topic oral corrective feedback
demotivated learners
motivated learners
preferences
EFL learners
url https://journal.uniku.ac.id/index.php/IEFLJ/article/view/662/519
work_keys_str_mv AT rezvanjafari studyofdemotivatedvsmotivatedefllearnerspreferencestowardsteachersoralerrorcorrection
AT habibollahmashhadi studyofdemotivatedvsmotivatedefllearnerspreferencestowardsteachersoralerrorcorrection
AT faridehokati studyofdemotivatedvsmotivatedefllearnerspreferencestowardsteachersoralerrorcorrection
AT royamovahed studyofdemotivatedvsmotivatedefllearnerspreferencestowardsteachersoralerrorcorrection