A computed tomography-based preoperative risk scoring system to distinguish lymphoepithelioma-like gastric carcinoma from non-lymphoepithelioma-like gastric carcinoma

PurposeThe aim of this study was to develop a preoperative risk scoring model for distinguishing lymphoepithelioma-like gastric carcinoma (LELGC) from non-LELGC based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images.MethodsClinicopathological features and CT findings of patients with LELGC and n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liming Li, Wenpeng Huang, Ping Hou, Weiwei Li, Menyun Feng, Yiyang Liu, Jianbo Gao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.872814/full
_version_ 1828238750436556800
author Liming Li
Liming Li
Wenpeng Huang
Wenpeng Huang
Ping Hou
Weiwei Li
Menyun Feng
Yiyang Liu
Jianbo Gao
Jianbo Gao
author_facet Liming Li
Liming Li
Wenpeng Huang
Wenpeng Huang
Ping Hou
Weiwei Li
Menyun Feng
Yiyang Liu
Jianbo Gao
Jianbo Gao
author_sort Liming Li
collection DOAJ
description PurposeThe aim of this study was to develop a preoperative risk scoring model for distinguishing lymphoepithelioma-like gastric carcinoma (LELGC) from non-LELGC based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images.MethodsClinicopathological features and CT findings of patients with LELGC and non-LELGC in our hospital from January 2016 to July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed and compared. A preoperative risk stratification model and a risk scoring system were developed using logistic regression.ResultsTwenty patients with LELGC and 40 patients with non-LELGC were included in the training cohort. Significant differences were observed in Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection and vascular invasion between the two groups (p < 0.05). Significant differences were observed in the distribution of location, enhancement pattern, homogeneous enhancement, CT-defined lymph node status, and attenuations in the non-contrast, arterial, and venous phases (all p < 0.05). Enhancement pattern, CT-defined lymph node status, and attenuation in venous phase were independent predictors of LELGC. The optimal cutoff score of distinguishing LELGC from non-LELGC was 3.5. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of risk identification model in the training cohort were 0.904, 87.5%, 80.0%, and 85.0%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of risk identification model in the validation cohort were 0.705 (95% CI 0.434–0.957), 75.0%, 63.6%, and 66.7%, respectively.ConclusionA preoperative risk identification model based on CT imaging data could be helpful for distinguishing LELGC from non-LELGC.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T21:10:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f68ce5c52318495294636d6883b334a3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-943X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T21:10:02Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj.art-f68ce5c52318495294636d6883b334a32022-12-22T03:16:36ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2022-09-011210.3389/fonc.2022.872814872814A computed tomography-based preoperative risk scoring system to distinguish lymphoepithelioma-like gastric carcinoma from non-lymphoepithelioma-like gastric carcinomaLiming Li0Liming Li1Wenpeng Huang2Wenpeng Huang3Ping Hou4Weiwei Li5Menyun Feng6Yiyang Liu7Jianbo Gao8Jianbo Gao9Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract, Henan Key Laboratory of Imaging Diagnosis and Treatment for Digestive System Tumor, Henan, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract, Henan Key Laboratory of Imaging Diagnosis and Treatment for Digestive System Tumor, Henan, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, ChinaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Tract, Henan Key Laboratory of Imaging Diagnosis and Treatment for Digestive System Tumor, Henan, ChinaPurposeThe aim of this study was to develop a preoperative risk scoring model for distinguishing lymphoepithelioma-like gastric carcinoma (LELGC) from non-LELGC based on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images.MethodsClinicopathological features and CT findings of patients with LELGC and non-LELGC in our hospital from January 2016 to July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed and compared. A preoperative risk stratification model and a risk scoring system were developed using logistic regression.ResultsTwenty patients with LELGC and 40 patients with non-LELGC were included in the training cohort. Significant differences were observed in Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection and vascular invasion between the two groups (p < 0.05). Significant differences were observed in the distribution of location, enhancement pattern, homogeneous enhancement, CT-defined lymph node status, and attenuations in the non-contrast, arterial, and venous phases (all p < 0.05). Enhancement pattern, CT-defined lymph node status, and attenuation in venous phase were independent predictors of LELGC. The optimal cutoff score of distinguishing LELGC from non-LELGC was 3.5. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of risk identification model in the training cohort were 0.904, 87.5%, 80.0%, and 85.0%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of risk identification model in the validation cohort were 0.705 (95% CI 0.434–0.957), 75.0%, 63.6%, and 66.7%, respectively.ConclusionA preoperative risk identification model based on CT imaging data could be helpful for distinguishing LELGC from non-LELGC.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.872814/fullgastric cancerlymphoepithelioma-like carcinomatomographyX-ray computedEpstein-Barr virusnomogram
spellingShingle Liming Li
Liming Li
Wenpeng Huang
Wenpeng Huang
Ping Hou
Weiwei Li
Menyun Feng
Yiyang Liu
Jianbo Gao
Jianbo Gao
A computed tomography-based preoperative risk scoring system to distinguish lymphoepithelioma-like gastric carcinoma from non-lymphoepithelioma-like gastric carcinoma
Frontiers in Oncology
gastric cancer
lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma
tomography
X-ray computed
Epstein-Barr virus
nomogram
title A computed tomography-based preoperative risk scoring system to distinguish lymphoepithelioma-like gastric carcinoma from non-lymphoepithelioma-like gastric carcinoma
title_full A computed tomography-based preoperative risk scoring system to distinguish lymphoepithelioma-like gastric carcinoma from non-lymphoepithelioma-like gastric carcinoma
title_fullStr A computed tomography-based preoperative risk scoring system to distinguish lymphoepithelioma-like gastric carcinoma from non-lymphoepithelioma-like gastric carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed A computed tomography-based preoperative risk scoring system to distinguish lymphoepithelioma-like gastric carcinoma from non-lymphoepithelioma-like gastric carcinoma
title_short A computed tomography-based preoperative risk scoring system to distinguish lymphoepithelioma-like gastric carcinoma from non-lymphoepithelioma-like gastric carcinoma
title_sort computed tomography based preoperative risk scoring system to distinguish lymphoepithelioma like gastric carcinoma from non lymphoepithelioma like gastric carcinoma
topic gastric cancer
lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma
tomography
X-ray computed
Epstein-Barr virus
nomogram
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.872814/full
work_keys_str_mv AT limingli acomputedtomographybasedpreoperativeriskscoringsystemtodistinguishlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinomafromnonlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinoma
AT limingli acomputedtomographybasedpreoperativeriskscoringsystemtodistinguishlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinomafromnonlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinoma
AT wenpenghuang acomputedtomographybasedpreoperativeriskscoringsystemtodistinguishlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinomafromnonlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinoma
AT wenpenghuang acomputedtomographybasedpreoperativeriskscoringsystemtodistinguishlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinomafromnonlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinoma
AT pinghou acomputedtomographybasedpreoperativeriskscoringsystemtodistinguishlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinomafromnonlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinoma
AT weiweili acomputedtomographybasedpreoperativeriskscoringsystemtodistinguishlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinomafromnonlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinoma
AT menyunfeng acomputedtomographybasedpreoperativeriskscoringsystemtodistinguishlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinomafromnonlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinoma
AT yiyangliu acomputedtomographybasedpreoperativeriskscoringsystemtodistinguishlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinomafromnonlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinoma
AT jianbogao acomputedtomographybasedpreoperativeriskscoringsystemtodistinguishlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinomafromnonlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinoma
AT jianbogao acomputedtomographybasedpreoperativeriskscoringsystemtodistinguishlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinomafromnonlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinoma
AT limingli computedtomographybasedpreoperativeriskscoringsystemtodistinguishlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinomafromnonlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinoma
AT limingli computedtomographybasedpreoperativeriskscoringsystemtodistinguishlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinomafromnonlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinoma
AT wenpenghuang computedtomographybasedpreoperativeriskscoringsystemtodistinguishlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinomafromnonlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinoma
AT wenpenghuang computedtomographybasedpreoperativeriskscoringsystemtodistinguishlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinomafromnonlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinoma
AT pinghou computedtomographybasedpreoperativeriskscoringsystemtodistinguishlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinomafromnonlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinoma
AT weiweili computedtomographybasedpreoperativeriskscoringsystemtodistinguishlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinomafromnonlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinoma
AT menyunfeng computedtomographybasedpreoperativeriskscoringsystemtodistinguishlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinomafromnonlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinoma
AT yiyangliu computedtomographybasedpreoperativeriskscoringsystemtodistinguishlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinomafromnonlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinoma
AT jianbogao computedtomographybasedpreoperativeriskscoringsystemtodistinguishlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinomafromnonlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinoma
AT jianbogao computedtomographybasedpreoperativeriskscoringsystemtodistinguishlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinomafromnonlymphoepitheliomalikegastriccarcinoma