Impact of New-Onset Conduction Disturbances following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Outcomes: A Single-Center Study

Background. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is known to increase the incidence of conduction disturbances compared to surgical aortic valve replacement; however, there are limited data on the impact and duration of these conduction disturbances on longer term outcomes. Objective. To de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Claudia See, Yanting Wang, Haocheng Huang, Helen Parise, Yiping Yang, Daniela Tirziu, Dominic P. Francese, Nikolaos Papoutsidakis, Eric Bader, Ryan K. Kaple, Michael Cleman, Alexandra J. Lansky, John K. Forrest
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi-Wiley 2023-01-01
Series:Journal of Interventional Cardiology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/5390338
_version_ 1797809203220316160
author Claudia See
Yanting Wang
Haocheng Huang
Helen Parise
Yiping Yang
Daniela Tirziu
Dominic P. Francese
Nikolaos Papoutsidakis
Eric Bader
Ryan K. Kaple
Michael Cleman
Alexandra J. Lansky
John K. Forrest
author_facet Claudia See
Yanting Wang
Haocheng Huang
Helen Parise
Yiping Yang
Daniela Tirziu
Dominic P. Francese
Nikolaos Papoutsidakis
Eric Bader
Ryan K. Kaple
Michael Cleman
Alexandra J. Lansky
John K. Forrest
author_sort Claudia See
collection DOAJ
description Background. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is known to increase the incidence of conduction disturbances compared to surgical aortic valve replacement; however, there are limited data on the impact and duration of these conduction disturbances on longer term outcomes. Objective. To determine the differential impact of persistent versus nonpersistent new-onset conduction disturbances on TAVR-related complications and outcomes. Methods. This is a single-center retrospective analysis of 927 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR at Yale New Haven Hospital from July 2012 to August 2019. Patients with new-onset conduction disturbances within 7 days following TAVR were selected for this study. Persistent and nonpersistent disturbances were, respectively, defined as persisting or not persisting on all patient ECGs for up to 1.5 years after TAVR or until death. Results. Within 7 days after TAVR, conduction disturbances occurred in 42.3% (392/927) of the patients. Conduction disturbances persisted in 150 (38%) patients and did not persist in 187 (48%) patients, and 55 (14%) patients were excluded for having mixed (both persistent and nonpersistent) disturbances. Compared with nonpersistent disturbances, patients with persistent disturbances were more likely to receive a PPM within 7 days after the TAVR procedure (46.0% versus 4.3%, p<0.001) and had a greater unadjusted 1-year cardiac-related and all-cause mortality risk (HR 2.54, p=0.044 and HR 1.90, p=0.046, respectively). Conclusion. Persistent conduction disturbances were associated with a greater cardiac and all-cause mortality rate at one year following TAVR. Future research should investigate periprocedural factors to reduce persistent conduction disturbances and outcomes beyond one year follow-up.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T06:49:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f6935a6d1bda4f908fb84fb9b794c4f6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1540-8183
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T06:49:00Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Hindawi-Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Interventional Cardiology
spelling doaj.art-f6935a6d1bda4f908fb84fb9b794c4f62023-06-08T00:00:03ZengHindawi-WileyJournal of Interventional Cardiology1540-81832023-01-01202310.1155/2023/5390338Impact of New-Onset Conduction Disturbances following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Outcomes: A Single-Center StudyClaudia See0Yanting Wang1Haocheng Huang2Helen Parise3Yiping Yang4Daniela Tirziu5Dominic P. Francese6Nikolaos Papoutsidakis7Eric Bader8Ryan K. Kaple9Michael Cleman10Alexandra J. Lansky11John K. Forrest12From the Section of Cardiovascular MedicineFrom the Section of Cardiovascular MedicineCardiovascular Medicine Clinical Research Analytics GroupFrom the Section of Cardiovascular MedicineFrom the Section of Cardiovascular MedicineFrom the Section of Cardiovascular MedicineFrom the Section of Cardiovascular MedicineFrom the Section of Cardiovascular MedicineFrom the Section of Cardiovascular MedicineFrom the Section of Cardiovascular MedicineFrom the Section of Cardiovascular MedicineFrom the Section of Cardiovascular MedicineFrom the Section of Cardiovascular MedicineBackground. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is known to increase the incidence of conduction disturbances compared to surgical aortic valve replacement; however, there are limited data on the impact and duration of these conduction disturbances on longer term outcomes. Objective. To determine the differential impact of persistent versus nonpersistent new-onset conduction disturbances on TAVR-related complications and outcomes. Methods. This is a single-center retrospective analysis of 927 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis who underwent TAVR at Yale New Haven Hospital from July 2012 to August 2019. Patients with new-onset conduction disturbances within 7 days following TAVR were selected for this study. Persistent and nonpersistent disturbances were, respectively, defined as persisting or not persisting on all patient ECGs for up to 1.5 years after TAVR or until death. Results. Within 7 days after TAVR, conduction disturbances occurred in 42.3% (392/927) of the patients. Conduction disturbances persisted in 150 (38%) patients and did not persist in 187 (48%) patients, and 55 (14%) patients were excluded for having mixed (both persistent and nonpersistent) disturbances. Compared with nonpersistent disturbances, patients with persistent disturbances were more likely to receive a PPM within 7 days after the TAVR procedure (46.0% versus 4.3%, p<0.001) and had a greater unadjusted 1-year cardiac-related and all-cause mortality risk (HR 2.54, p=0.044 and HR 1.90, p=0.046, respectively). Conclusion. Persistent conduction disturbances were associated with a greater cardiac and all-cause mortality rate at one year following TAVR. Future research should investigate periprocedural factors to reduce persistent conduction disturbances and outcomes beyond one year follow-up.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/5390338
spellingShingle Claudia See
Yanting Wang
Haocheng Huang
Helen Parise
Yiping Yang
Daniela Tirziu
Dominic P. Francese
Nikolaos Papoutsidakis
Eric Bader
Ryan K. Kaple
Michael Cleman
Alexandra J. Lansky
John K. Forrest
Impact of New-Onset Conduction Disturbances following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Outcomes: A Single-Center Study
Journal of Interventional Cardiology
title Impact of New-Onset Conduction Disturbances following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Outcomes: A Single-Center Study
title_full Impact of New-Onset Conduction Disturbances following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Outcomes: A Single-Center Study
title_fullStr Impact of New-Onset Conduction Disturbances following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Outcomes: A Single-Center Study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of New-Onset Conduction Disturbances following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Outcomes: A Single-Center Study
title_short Impact of New-Onset Conduction Disturbances following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Outcomes: A Single-Center Study
title_sort impact of new onset conduction disturbances following transcatheter aortic valve replacement on outcomes a single center study
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/5390338
work_keys_str_mv AT claudiasee impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy
AT yantingwang impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy
AT haochenghuang impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy
AT helenparise impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy
AT yipingyang impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy
AT danielatirziu impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy
AT dominicpfrancese impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy
AT nikolaospapoutsidakis impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy
AT ericbader impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy
AT ryankkaple impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy
AT michaelcleman impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy
AT alexandrajlansky impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy
AT johnkforrest impactofnewonsetconductiondisturbancesfollowingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementonoutcomesasinglecenterstudy