Who belongs to the swiss body politique—A diaspora perspective

In this paper, I try to better understand the intersection between “integration” in legal terms, and how long-term resident “non-citizens” and migrants from the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY) situate themselves in narratives of belonging vis a vis the normative power structur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sandra King-Savic
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Political Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2023.1145634/full
_version_ 1797793344726761472
author Sandra King-Savic
author_facet Sandra King-Savic
author_sort Sandra King-Savic
collection DOAJ
description In this paper, I try to better understand the intersection between “integration” in legal terms, and how long-term resident “non-citizens” and migrants from the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY) situate themselves in narratives of belonging vis a vis the normative power structure that constitutes the Swiss body politique. More specifically, how do labor and forced migrants from former Yugoslavia negotiate the shifting understanding of “integration” in Switzerland in legal and social terms? Former Yugoslavs constitute not only a comparatively large number of “non-citizens” in Switzerland, but individuals from-and-with-connections to this community also embody numerous labels and categories of migrant that statistical databases, the media, and legal practices attach to them since the 1970s. Key findings in this paper illustrate a two-tiered narrative: “non-citizens” seemed to have maintain(ed) their pursuit of not attracting attention to their persona—a strategy that allowed individuals to disappear within the larger society. Ensuing Europeanization processes, coupled with the Wars of Yugoslav Succession during the 1990s, however, brought to the fore “a politics of rupture” that called into question othering processes, and the seemingly tightening sociolegal basis of belonging to the Swiss body politique. Hitherto examined data suggests that interlocutors pursue a “positive essentialist frame” to counter exclusionary narratives “non-citizens” experience to postulate “rights claims”. Interviewees, in other words, activate diaspora connections and networks to support and aid each other when legal and socio-political questions arise, but also to actively influence the political and legal landscape in Switzerland.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T02:45:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f696c683bfb64e5a8d507b1e29c01444
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-3145
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T02:45:58Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Political Science
spelling doaj.art-f696c683bfb64e5a8d507b1e29c014442023-06-28T18:35:25ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Political Science2673-31452023-06-01510.3389/fpos.2023.11456341145634Who belongs to the swiss body politique—A diaspora perspectiveSandra King-SavicIn this paper, I try to better understand the intersection between “integration” in legal terms, and how long-term resident “non-citizens” and migrants from the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY) situate themselves in narratives of belonging vis a vis the normative power structure that constitutes the Swiss body politique. More specifically, how do labor and forced migrants from former Yugoslavia negotiate the shifting understanding of “integration” in Switzerland in legal and social terms? Former Yugoslavs constitute not only a comparatively large number of “non-citizens” in Switzerland, but individuals from-and-with-connections to this community also embody numerous labels and categories of migrant that statistical databases, the media, and legal practices attach to them since the 1970s. Key findings in this paper illustrate a two-tiered narrative: “non-citizens” seemed to have maintain(ed) their pursuit of not attracting attention to their persona—a strategy that allowed individuals to disappear within the larger society. Ensuing Europeanization processes, coupled with the Wars of Yugoslav Succession during the 1990s, however, brought to the fore “a politics of rupture” that called into question othering processes, and the seemingly tightening sociolegal basis of belonging to the Swiss body politique. Hitherto examined data suggests that interlocutors pursue a “positive essentialist frame” to counter exclusionary narratives “non-citizens” experience to postulate “rights claims”. Interviewees, in other words, activate diaspora connections and networks to support and aid each other when legal and socio-political questions arise, but also to actively influence the political and legal landscape in Switzerland.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2023.1145634/fullbelongingintegrationdiaspora practicescitizenshiplabor migration
spellingShingle Sandra King-Savic
Who belongs to the swiss body politique—A diaspora perspective
Frontiers in Political Science
belonging
integration
diaspora practices
citizenship
labor migration
title Who belongs to the swiss body politique—A diaspora perspective
title_full Who belongs to the swiss body politique—A diaspora perspective
title_fullStr Who belongs to the swiss body politique—A diaspora perspective
title_full_unstemmed Who belongs to the swiss body politique—A diaspora perspective
title_short Who belongs to the swiss body politique—A diaspora perspective
title_sort who belongs to the swiss body politique a diaspora perspective
topic belonging
integration
diaspora practices
citizenship
labor migration
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpos.2023.1145634/full
work_keys_str_mv AT sandrakingsavic whobelongstotheswissbodypolitiqueadiasporaperspective