What, If Anything, Is Linguistic Creativity?

This paper investigates the nature of creativity in language and linguistics. Following Sampson (2016), it distinguishes between F-creativity (which roughly equals linguistic productivity) and E-creativity (which leads to new and unexpected innovations). These two notions of creativity are discussed...

詳細記述

書誌詳細
第一著者: Bergs Alexander
フォーマット: 論文
言語:deu
出版事項: Sciendo 2019-07-01
シリーズ:Gestalt Theory
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:https://doi.org/10.2478/gth-2019-0017
その他の書誌記述
要約:This paper investigates the nature of creativity in language and linguistics. Following Sampson (2016), it distinguishes between F-creativity (which roughly equals linguistic productivity) and E-creativity (which leads to new and unexpected innovations). These two notions of creativity are discussed on the basis of examples from three different domains: snow cloning, mismatch/coercion, and aberration. It is shown that pure E-creativity may only be found in the case of aberration. Both snow cloning and mismatch/coercion are examples for F-creativity, but to varying degrees. As a consequence, it is suggested that in practice, F- and E-creativity actually form a cline, rather than a dichotomy.
ISSN:2519-5808