Socio-cultural and institutional contradictions: calls for the innovative development of Russia

<span>The article addresses the socio-cultural and institutional problems of the innovative development of the Russian economy. The author concludes that the most important obstacle to innovative development in all spheres of the social, economic and cultural life of Russia is not the lack of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Natalia N. Zarubina
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS), Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology 2014-06-01
Series:Социологическая наука и социальная практика
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/socjour/article/view/3057/2852
_version_ 1818723970005860352
author Natalia N. Zarubina
author_facet Natalia N. Zarubina
author_sort Natalia N. Zarubina
collection DOAJ
description <span>The article addresses the socio-cultural and institutional problems of the innovative development of the Russian economy. The author concludes that the most important obstacle to innovative development in all spheres of the social, economic and cultural life of Russia is not the lack of social innovations but its extremely high pace . Social life in Russia for centuries formed under constant transformations representing non-organic attempts at modernisation from the up side . Economic reforms in the 1990s went beyond the permissible “step novelty” and caused the simplification and archaisation of the economy and human capital, resulting in the closure and conversion of modern high-tech industries, losing the skills of the workforce . Russian markets and entrepreneurship, understood as the existing system of institutions, themselves do not motivate the innovative behaviour of the participants . Furthermore, due to the orientation toward an immediate return, the innovative activities can be blocked because it is difficult to be evaluated using formal monetary indicators. A significant part of society feels alienated from the changes taking place . In response to the alienation from social innovation comes the archaisation of social practices . It is more or less a conscious rejection of innovations in various areas of life due to its inaccessibility and the lack of an institutional environment for its development.</span>
first_indexed 2024-12-17T21:18:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f6ae567befa64c42840a0e39c39ef101
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2308-6416
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-12-17T21:18:58Z
publishDate 2014-06-01
publisher Russian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS), Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology
record_format Article
series Социологическая наука и социальная практика
spelling doaj.art-f6ae567befa64c42840a0e39c39ef1012022-12-21T21:32:16ZrusRussian Academy of Sciences (FCTAS RAS), Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied SociologyСоциологическая наука и социальная практика2308-64162014-06-012025223057Socio-cultural and institutional contradictions: calls for the innovative development of RussiaNatalia N. Zarubina0MGIMO-University<span>The article addresses the socio-cultural and institutional problems of the innovative development of the Russian economy. The author concludes that the most important obstacle to innovative development in all spheres of the social, economic and cultural life of Russia is not the lack of social innovations but its extremely high pace . Social life in Russia for centuries formed under constant transformations representing non-organic attempts at modernisation from the up side . Economic reforms in the 1990s went beyond the permissible “step novelty” and caused the simplification and archaisation of the economy and human capital, resulting in the closure and conversion of modern high-tech industries, losing the skills of the workforce . Russian markets and entrepreneurship, understood as the existing system of institutions, themselves do not motivate the innovative behaviour of the participants . Furthermore, due to the orientation toward an immediate return, the innovative activities can be blocked because it is difficult to be evaluated using formal monetary indicators. A significant part of society feels alienated from the changes taking place . In response to the alienation from social innovation comes the archaisation of social practices . It is more or less a conscious rejection of innovations in various areas of life due to its inaccessibility and the lack of an institutional environment for its development.</span>https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/socjour/article/view/3057/2852social innovationinnovativeness«step novelty»social inequalitycomplex societyadaptationarchaismeveryday life
spellingShingle Natalia N. Zarubina
Socio-cultural and institutional contradictions: calls for the innovative development of Russia
Социологическая наука и социальная практика
social innovation
innovativeness
«step novelty»
social inequality
complex society
adaptation
archaism
everyday life
title Socio-cultural and institutional contradictions: calls for the innovative development of Russia
title_full Socio-cultural and institutional contradictions: calls for the innovative development of Russia
title_fullStr Socio-cultural and institutional contradictions: calls for the innovative development of Russia
title_full_unstemmed Socio-cultural and institutional contradictions: calls for the innovative development of Russia
title_short Socio-cultural and institutional contradictions: calls for the innovative development of Russia
title_sort socio cultural and institutional contradictions calls for the innovative development of russia
topic social innovation
innovativeness
«step novelty»
social inequality
complex society
adaptation
archaism
everyday life
url https://www.jour.fnisc.ru/index.php/socjour/article/view/3057/2852
work_keys_str_mv AT natalianzarubina socioculturalandinstitutionalcontradictionscallsfortheinnovativedevelopmentofrussia