Difference in developmental dynamics between subcutaneous and abdominal adipose tissues in goose (Anser Cygnoides)
ABSTRACT: Goose (Anas cygnoides), as a typical species domesticated from a migratory bird, has maintained the capability of depositing excess lipid and preferentially accumulating fat within the abdomen and subcutaneous, which not only leads to decrease in yield of meat product, but also affects the...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-08-01
|
Series: | Poultry Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579121002194 |
_version_ | 1818648412506030080 |
---|---|
author | Weiran Huo Kaiqi Weng Tiantian Gu Yu Zhang Yang Zhang Guohong Chen Qi Xu |
author_facet | Weiran Huo Kaiqi Weng Tiantian Gu Yu Zhang Yang Zhang Guohong Chen Qi Xu |
author_sort | Weiran Huo |
collection | DOAJ |
description | ABSTRACT: Goose (Anas cygnoides), as a typical species domesticated from a migratory bird, has maintained the capability of depositing excess lipid and preferentially accumulating fat within the abdomen and subcutaneous, which not only leads to decrease in yield of meat product, but also affects the feed conversion rate. Here, an experiment was conducted to examine the difference in developmental dynamics between subcutaneous (SAT) and abdominal adipose tissues (AAT) in goose. The results showed that SAT could be clearly observed at embryonic days (E) 15, whereas AAT were clearer until E20. Although the weights of SAT and AAT showed a significant rising with advancing age (P < 0.05), their gains were not completely uniform, and more adipose deposited preferentially toward AAT after birth (P < 0.05). Additionally, a clear expansion in adipocyte size was observed in AAT and SAT during embryonic stages (P < 0.05). The average adipocyte area in AAT continued to increase after birth (P < 0.05), while the cell areas in SAT were relatively invariable (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the expression levels of FABP4/aP2, ACSL1 and PPARγ were much higher in SAT than in AAT, whereas relative higher expression level of IL-6 was observed in the AAT during embryonic stages. After birth, the more expression of LPL and PPARα were detected in AAT than did in SAT (P < 0.05), whereas greater ATGL expression was in SAT (P < 0.05). Taken together, these findings suggest that AAT may display greater fat storage capacity than SAT accompanied by changes in cell area and lipogenic capacity. Considering that there is disparity in the individual adipose tissues, we suggested that careful consideration for the precise interventions used to control SAT or AAT deposition in meat-producing animals to improve feed efficiency. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-17T01:18:01Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f6c51fed24854074aa956bb43c4a0fa3 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0032-5791 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-17T01:18:01Z |
publishDate | 2021-08-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Poultry Science |
spelling | doaj.art-f6c51fed24854074aa956bb43c4a0fa32022-12-21T22:08:57ZengElsevierPoultry Science0032-57912021-08-011008101185Difference in developmental dynamics between subcutaneous and abdominal adipose tissues in goose (Anser Cygnoides)Weiran Huo0Kaiqi Weng1Tiantian Gu2Yu Zhang3Yang Zhang4Guohong Chen5Qi Xu6Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding and Molecular Design of Jiangsu Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, ChinaKey Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding and Molecular Design of Jiangsu Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, ChinaKey Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding and Molecular Design of Jiangsu Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, ChinaKey Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding and Molecular Design of Jiangsu Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, ChinaKey Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding and Molecular Design of Jiangsu Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, ChinaKey Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding and Molecular Design of Jiangsu Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, the Ministry of Education of China, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, ChinaKey Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding and Molecular Design of Jiangsu Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; Corresponding author:ABSTRACT: Goose (Anas cygnoides), as a typical species domesticated from a migratory bird, has maintained the capability of depositing excess lipid and preferentially accumulating fat within the abdomen and subcutaneous, which not only leads to decrease in yield of meat product, but also affects the feed conversion rate. Here, an experiment was conducted to examine the difference in developmental dynamics between subcutaneous (SAT) and abdominal adipose tissues (AAT) in goose. The results showed that SAT could be clearly observed at embryonic days (E) 15, whereas AAT were clearer until E20. Although the weights of SAT and AAT showed a significant rising with advancing age (P < 0.05), their gains were not completely uniform, and more adipose deposited preferentially toward AAT after birth (P < 0.05). Additionally, a clear expansion in adipocyte size was observed in AAT and SAT during embryonic stages (P < 0.05). The average adipocyte area in AAT continued to increase after birth (P < 0.05), while the cell areas in SAT were relatively invariable (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the expression levels of FABP4/aP2, ACSL1 and PPARγ were much higher in SAT than in AAT, whereas relative higher expression level of IL-6 was observed in the AAT during embryonic stages. After birth, the more expression of LPL and PPARα were detected in AAT than did in SAT (P < 0.05), whereas greater ATGL expression was in SAT (P < 0.05). Taken together, these findings suggest that AAT may display greater fat storage capacity than SAT accompanied by changes in cell area and lipogenic capacity. Considering that there is disparity in the individual adipose tissues, we suggested that careful consideration for the precise interventions used to control SAT or AAT deposition in meat-producing animals to improve feed efficiency.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579121002194gooseadipose tissuesdevelopmentcellularitymetabolism |
spellingShingle | Weiran Huo Kaiqi Weng Tiantian Gu Yu Zhang Yang Zhang Guohong Chen Qi Xu Difference in developmental dynamics between subcutaneous and abdominal adipose tissues in goose (Anser Cygnoides) Poultry Science goose adipose tissues development cellularity metabolism |
title | Difference in developmental dynamics between subcutaneous and abdominal adipose tissues in goose (Anser Cygnoides) |
title_full | Difference in developmental dynamics between subcutaneous and abdominal adipose tissues in goose (Anser Cygnoides) |
title_fullStr | Difference in developmental dynamics between subcutaneous and abdominal adipose tissues in goose (Anser Cygnoides) |
title_full_unstemmed | Difference in developmental dynamics between subcutaneous and abdominal adipose tissues in goose (Anser Cygnoides) |
title_short | Difference in developmental dynamics between subcutaneous and abdominal adipose tissues in goose (Anser Cygnoides) |
title_sort | difference in developmental dynamics between subcutaneous and abdominal adipose tissues in goose anser cygnoides |
topic | goose adipose tissues development cellularity metabolism |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579121002194 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weiranhuo differenceindevelopmentaldynamicsbetweensubcutaneousandabdominaladiposetissuesingooseansercygnoides AT kaiqiweng differenceindevelopmentaldynamicsbetweensubcutaneousandabdominaladiposetissuesingooseansercygnoides AT tiantiangu differenceindevelopmentaldynamicsbetweensubcutaneousandabdominaladiposetissuesingooseansercygnoides AT yuzhang differenceindevelopmentaldynamicsbetweensubcutaneousandabdominaladiposetissuesingooseansercygnoides AT yangzhang differenceindevelopmentaldynamicsbetweensubcutaneousandabdominaladiposetissuesingooseansercygnoides AT guohongchen differenceindevelopmentaldynamicsbetweensubcutaneousandabdominaladiposetissuesingooseansercygnoides AT qixu differenceindevelopmentaldynamicsbetweensubcutaneousandabdominaladiposetissuesingooseansercygnoides |