Life Cycle Assessment of Biochar versus Metal Catalysts Used in Syngas Cleaning
Biomass gasification has the potential to produce renewable fuels, chemicals and power at large utility scale facilities. In these plants catalysts would likely be used to reform and clean the generated biomass syngas. Traditional catalysts are made from transition metals, while catalysts made from...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2015-01-01
|
| Series: | Energies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/1/621 |
| _version_ | 1811300414861082624 |
|---|---|
| author | Robert S. Frazier Enze Jin Ajay Kumar |
| author_facet | Robert S. Frazier Enze Jin Ajay Kumar |
| author_sort | Robert S. Frazier |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Biomass gasification has the potential to produce renewable fuels, chemicals and power at large utility scale facilities. In these plants catalysts would likely be used to reform and clean the generated biomass syngas. Traditional catalysts are made from transition metals, while catalysts made from biochar are being studied. A life cycle assessment (LCA) study was performed to analyze the sustainability, via impact assessments, of producing a metal catalyst versus a dedicated biochar catalyst. The LCA results indicate that biochar has a 93% reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and requires 95.7% less energy than the metal catalyst to produce. The study also estimated that biochar production would also have fewer impacts on human health (e.g., carcinogens and respiratory impacts) than the production of a metal catalyst. The possible disadvantage of biochar production in the ecosystem quality is due mostly to its impacts on agricultural land occupation. Sensitivity analysis was carried out to assess environmental impacts of variability in the two production systems. In the metal catalyst manufacture, the extraction and production of nickel (Ni) had significant negative effects on the environmental impacts. For biochar production, low moisture content (MC, 9%) and high yield type (8 tons/acre) switchgrass appeared more sustainable. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T06:50:49Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f6c9a1a02ad14a0a84c605f619211ac6 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1996-1073 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T06:50:49Z |
| publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Energies |
| spelling | doaj.art-f6c9a1a02ad14a0a84c605f619211ac62022-12-22T02:57:25ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732015-01-018162164410.3390/en8010621en8010621Life Cycle Assessment of Biochar versus Metal Catalysts Used in Syngas CleaningRobert S. Frazier0Enze Jin1Ajay Kumar2Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Oklahoma State University, 212 Ag Hall, Stillwater, OK 74074, USABiosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Oklahoma State University, 212 Ag Hall, Stillwater, OK 74074, USABiosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Oklahoma State University, 212 Ag Hall, Stillwater, OK 74074, USABiomass gasification has the potential to produce renewable fuels, chemicals and power at large utility scale facilities. In these plants catalysts would likely be used to reform and clean the generated biomass syngas. Traditional catalysts are made from transition metals, while catalysts made from biochar are being studied. A life cycle assessment (LCA) study was performed to analyze the sustainability, via impact assessments, of producing a metal catalyst versus a dedicated biochar catalyst. The LCA results indicate that biochar has a 93% reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and requires 95.7% less energy than the metal catalyst to produce. The study also estimated that biochar production would also have fewer impacts on human health (e.g., carcinogens and respiratory impacts) than the production of a metal catalyst. The possible disadvantage of biochar production in the ecosystem quality is due mostly to its impacts on agricultural land occupation. Sensitivity analysis was carried out to assess environmental impacts of variability in the two production systems. In the metal catalyst manufacture, the extraction and production of nickel (Ni) had significant negative effects on the environmental impacts. For biochar production, low moisture content (MC, 9%) and high yield type (8 tons/acre) switchgrass appeared more sustainable.http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/1/621biocharsyngascatalystgasificationtarlife cycle assessment (LCA)impactssustainability |
| spellingShingle | Robert S. Frazier Enze Jin Ajay Kumar Life Cycle Assessment of Biochar versus Metal Catalysts Used in Syngas Cleaning Energies biochar syngas catalyst gasification tar life cycle assessment (LCA) impacts sustainability |
| title | Life Cycle Assessment of Biochar versus Metal Catalysts Used in Syngas Cleaning |
| title_full | Life Cycle Assessment of Biochar versus Metal Catalysts Used in Syngas Cleaning |
| title_fullStr | Life Cycle Assessment of Biochar versus Metal Catalysts Used in Syngas Cleaning |
| title_full_unstemmed | Life Cycle Assessment of Biochar versus Metal Catalysts Used in Syngas Cleaning |
| title_short | Life Cycle Assessment of Biochar versus Metal Catalysts Used in Syngas Cleaning |
| title_sort | life cycle assessment of biochar versus metal catalysts used in syngas cleaning |
| topic | biochar syngas catalyst gasification tar life cycle assessment (LCA) impacts sustainability |
| url | http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/1/621 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT robertsfrazier lifecycleassessmentofbiocharversusmetalcatalystsusedinsyngascleaning AT enzejin lifecycleassessmentofbiocharversusmetalcatalystsusedinsyngascleaning AT ajaykumar lifecycleassessmentofbiocharversusmetalcatalystsusedinsyngascleaning |