Impact of Natural Blind Spot Location on Perimetry

Abstract We study the spatial distribution of natural blind spot location (NBSL) and its impact on perimetry. Pattern deviation (PD) values of 11,449 reliable visual fields (VFs) that are defined as clinically unaffected based on summary indices were extracted from 11,449 glaucoma patients. We model...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mengyu Wang, Lucy Q. Shen, Michael V. Boland, Sarah R. Wellik, Carlos Gustavo De Moraes, Jonathan S. Myers, Peter J. Bex, Tobias Elze
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2017-07-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06580-7
_version_ 1819040076542246912
author Mengyu Wang
Lucy Q. Shen
Michael V. Boland
Sarah R. Wellik
Carlos Gustavo De Moraes
Jonathan S. Myers
Peter J. Bex
Tobias Elze
author_facet Mengyu Wang
Lucy Q. Shen
Michael V. Boland
Sarah R. Wellik
Carlos Gustavo De Moraes
Jonathan S. Myers
Peter J. Bex
Tobias Elze
author_sort Mengyu Wang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract We study the spatial distribution of natural blind spot location (NBSL) and its impact on perimetry. Pattern deviation (PD) values of 11,449 reliable visual fields (VFs) that are defined as clinically unaffected based on summary indices were extracted from 11,449 glaucoma patients. We modeled NBSL distribution using a two-dimensional non-linear regression approach and correlated NBSL with spherical equivalent (SE). Additionally, we compared PD values of groups with longer and shorter distances than median, and larger and smaller angles than median between NBSL and fixation. Mean and standard deviation of horizontal and vertical NBSL were 14.33° ± 1.37° and −2.06° ± 1.27°, respectively. SE decreased with increasing NBSL (correlation: r = −0.14, p < 0.001). For NBSL distances longer than median distance (14.32°), average PD values decreased in the upper central (average difference for significant points (ADSP): −0.18 dB) and increased in the lower nasal VF region (ADSP: 0.14 dB). For angles in the direction of upper hemifield relative to the median angle (−8.13°), PD values decreased in lower nasal (ADSP: −0.11 dB) and increased in upper temporal VF areas (ADSP: 0.19 dB). In conclusion, we demonstrate that NBSL has a systematic effect on the spatial distribution of VF sensitivity.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T09:03:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f6d610b24ba844cfb2f0df8dabd16b8d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T09:03:21Z
publishDate 2017-07-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-f6d610b24ba844cfb2f0df8dabd16b8d2022-12-21T19:09:25ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222017-07-01711910.1038/s41598-017-06580-7Impact of Natural Blind Spot Location on PerimetryMengyu Wang0Lucy Q. Shen1Michael V. Boland2Sarah R. Wellik3Carlos Gustavo De Moraes4Jonathan S. Myers5Peter J. Bex6Tobias Elze7Schepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard Medical SchoolMass. Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical SchoolWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami School of MedicineEdward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Medical CenterWills Eye Hospital, Thomas Jefferson UniversityDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern UniversitySchepens Eye Research Institute, Harvard Medical SchoolAbstract We study the spatial distribution of natural blind spot location (NBSL) and its impact on perimetry. Pattern deviation (PD) values of 11,449 reliable visual fields (VFs) that are defined as clinically unaffected based on summary indices were extracted from 11,449 glaucoma patients. We modeled NBSL distribution using a two-dimensional non-linear regression approach and correlated NBSL with spherical equivalent (SE). Additionally, we compared PD values of groups with longer and shorter distances than median, and larger and smaller angles than median between NBSL and fixation. Mean and standard deviation of horizontal and vertical NBSL were 14.33° ± 1.37° and −2.06° ± 1.27°, respectively. SE decreased with increasing NBSL (correlation: r = −0.14, p < 0.001). For NBSL distances longer than median distance (14.32°), average PD values decreased in the upper central (average difference for significant points (ADSP): −0.18 dB) and increased in the lower nasal VF region (ADSP: 0.14 dB). For angles in the direction of upper hemifield relative to the median angle (−8.13°), PD values decreased in lower nasal (ADSP: −0.11 dB) and increased in upper temporal VF areas (ADSP: 0.19 dB). In conclusion, we demonstrate that NBSL has a systematic effect on the spatial distribution of VF sensitivity.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06580-7
spellingShingle Mengyu Wang
Lucy Q. Shen
Michael V. Boland
Sarah R. Wellik
Carlos Gustavo De Moraes
Jonathan S. Myers
Peter J. Bex
Tobias Elze
Impact of Natural Blind Spot Location on Perimetry
Scientific Reports
title Impact of Natural Blind Spot Location on Perimetry
title_full Impact of Natural Blind Spot Location on Perimetry
title_fullStr Impact of Natural Blind Spot Location on Perimetry
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Natural Blind Spot Location on Perimetry
title_short Impact of Natural Blind Spot Location on Perimetry
title_sort impact of natural blind spot location on perimetry
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06580-7
work_keys_str_mv AT mengyuwang impactofnaturalblindspotlocationonperimetry
AT lucyqshen impactofnaturalblindspotlocationonperimetry
AT michaelvboland impactofnaturalblindspotlocationonperimetry
AT sarahrwellik impactofnaturalblindspotlocationonperimetry
AT carlosgustavodemoraes impactofnaturalblindspotlocationonperimetry
AT jonathansmyers impactofnaturalblindspotlocationonperimetry
AT peterjbex impactofnaturalblindspotlocationonperimetry
AT tobiaselze impactofnaturalblindspotlocationonperimetry