Horizon, homogeneity and flatness problems: do their resolutions really depend upon inflation?
Abstract The horizon problem, encountered in cosmology, is derived as such for world models based on Robertson–Walker metric where homogeneity and isotropy of the universe is assumed to begin with and is guaranteed for all epochs. Actually, the only thing that happens in this scenario is that in suc...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SpringerOpen
2024-04-01
|
| Series: | European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12740-7 |
| _version_ | 1797209174811082752 |
|---|---|
| author | Ashok K. Singal |
| author_facet | Ashok K. Singal |
| author_sort | Ashok K. Singal |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract The horizon problem, encountered in cosmology, is derived as such for world models based on Robertson–Walker metric where homogeneity and isotropy of the universe is assumed to begin with and is guaranteed for all epochs. Actually, the only thing that happens in this scenario is that in such a universe, described by a single, time-dependent scale factor, which may otherwise be independent of spatial coordinates, the light signals in a finite time might not cover all the available space. Further, the flatness problem, as it is posed, is not even falsifiable. The usual argument offered in the literature is that the present density of the universe is very close to the critical density value and that the universe must be flat since otherwise in past at $$\sim 10^{-35}$$ ∼ 10 - 35 second (near the epoch of inflation) there will be extremely low departures of density from the critical density value (of the order $$\sim 10^{-53}$$ ∼ 10 - 53 ), requiring a sort of fine tuning. We show that even if the present value of the density parameter were very different, still at $$10^{-35}$$ 10 - 35 second it would differ from unity by the same fraction. Thus a use of fine tuning argument to promote $$k = 0$$ k = 0 model amounts to a priori rejection of all models with $$k \ne 0$$ k ≠ 0 . Without casting any aspersions on the inflationary theory, which after all is the most promising paradigm to explain the pattern of anisotropies observed in the cosmic microwave background, we argue that one cannot use homogeneity and flatness in support of inflation. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T09:50:31Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f6dbcf7eeee34920958600f33e4c2f15 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1434-6052 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T09:50:31Z |
| publishDate | 2024-04-01 |
| publisher | SpringerOpen |
| record_format | Article |
| series | European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields |
| spelling | doaj.art-f6dbcf7eeee34920958600f33e4c2f152024-04-14T11:26:05ZengSpringerOpenEuropean Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields1434-60522024-04-018441810.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12740-7Horizon, homogeneity and flatness problems: do their resolutions really depend upon inflation?Ashok K. Singal0Astronomy and Astrophysics Division, Physical Research LaboratoryAbstract The horizon problem, encountered in cosmology, is derived as such for world models based on Robertson–Walker metric where homogeneity and isotropy of the universe is assumed to begin with and is guaranteed for all epochs. Actually, the only thing that happens in this scenario is that in such a universe, described by a single, time-dependent scale factor, which may otherwise be independent of spatial coordinates, the light signals in a finite time might not cover all the available space. Further, the flatness problem, as it is posed, is not even falsifiable. The usual argument offered in the literature is that the present density of the universe is very close to the critical density value and that the universe must be flat since otherwise in past at $$\sim 10^{-35}$$ ∼ 10 - 35 second (near the epoch of inflation) there will be extremely low departures of density from the critical density value (of the order $$\sim 10^{-53}$$ ∼ 10 - 53 ), requiring a sort of fine tuning. We show that even if the present value of the density parameter were very different, still at $$10^{-35}$$ 10 - 35 second it would differ from unity by the same fraction. Thus a use of fine tuning argument to promote $$k = 0$$ k = 0 model amounts to a priori rejection of all models with $$k \ne 0$$ k ≠ 0 . Without casting any aspersions on the inflationary theory, which after all is the most promising paradigm to explain the pattern of anisotropies observed in the cosmic microwave background, we argue that one cannot use homogeneity and flatness in support of inflation.https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12740-7 |
| spellingShingle | Ashok K. Singal Horizon, homogeneity and flatness problems: do their resolutions really depend upon inflation? European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields |
| title | Horizon, homogeneity and flatness problems: do their resolutions really depend upon inflation? |
| title_full | Horizon, homogeneity and flatness problems: do their resolutions really depend upon inflation? |
| title_fullStr | Horizon, homogeneity and flatness problems: do their resolutions really depend upon inflation? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Horizon, homogeneity and flatness problems: do their resolutions really depend upon inflation? |
| title_short | Horizon, homogeneity and flatness problems: do their resolutions really depend upon inflation? |
| title_sort | horizon homogeneity and flatness problems do their resolutions really depend upon inflation |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12740-7 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ashokksingal horizonhomogeneityandflatnessproblemsdotheirresolutionsreallydependuponinflation |