Regulatory focus and human values

The present article connects two approaches to the study of human motivation and behavior: The Schwartz model of human values and Higgins’ regulatory focus theory. Considering a prominent model of human motivation - the Rubicon Model of Action Phases - reveals that although both approaches...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keller Johannes, Kesberg Rebekka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Drustvo Psihologa Srbije 2017-01-01
Series:Psihologija
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0048-5705/2017/0048-57051700004K.pdf
_version_ 1818859034581663744
author Keller Johannes
Kesberg Rebekka
author_facet Keller Johannes
Kesberg Rebekka
author_sort Keller Johannes
collection DOAJ
description The present article connects two approaches to the study of human motivation and behavior: The Schwartz model of human values and Higgins’ regulatory focus theory. Considering a prominent model of human motivation - the Rubicon Model of Action Phases - reveals that although both approaches refer to goals and standards as crucial constructs, human values are specifically relevant concerning the so-called deliberation and evaluation phases whereas selfregulatory orientations are specifically relevant concerning the volitional phases (i.e., planning and action). It may be due to the selective focus on specific aspects of human motivation that up to date hardly any (empirical) work has tried to connect human values and selfregulatory orientations. The reported studies assessed the relation between the endorsement of values proposed in the Schwartz model of human values and individual differences in the two self-regulatory orientations (promotion and prevention) proposed in regulatory focus theory. Findings reveal that prevention-focused self-regulation is positively related to conservation values (security, conformity) and negatively related to values reflecting openness to change (stimulation, self-direction). Moreover, promotion-focused self-regulation was positively related to self-enhancement values (power, achievement) and negatively related to values reflecting self-transcendence (universalism, benevolence). In addition, the observed relations were found using different instruments to measure human values and self-regulatory orientations. In combination, the observed findings support the proposed two-dimensional structure of the value system as well as fundamental assumptions of regulatory focus theory.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T09:05:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f6dd8cb433bb482cbd0bdba80d253061
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0048-5705
1451-9283
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T09:05:46Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Drustvo Psihologa Srbije
record_format Article
series Psihologija
spelling doaj.art-f6dd8cb433bb482cbd0bdba80d2530612022-12-21T20:28:21ZengDrustvo Psihologa SrbijePsihologija0048-57051451-92832017-01-0150215718610.2298/PSI160809004K0048-57051700004KRegulatory focus and human valuesKeller Johannes0Kesberg Rebekka1Ulm University, Department of Social Psychology, Ulm, GermanyUlm University, Department of Social Psychology, Ulm, GermanyThe present article connects two approaches to the study of human motivation and behavior: The Schwartz model of human values and Higgins’ regulatory focus theory. Considering a prominent model of human motivation - the Rubicon Model of Action Phases - reveals that although both approaches refer to goals and standards as crucial constructs, human values are specifically relevant concerning the so-called deliberation and evaluation phases whereas selfregulatory orientations are specifically relevant concerning the volitional phases (i.e., planning and action). It may be due to the selective focus on specific aspects of human motivation that up to date hardly any (empirical) work has tried to connect human values and selfregulatory orientations. The reported studies assessed the relation between the endorsement of values proposed in the Schwartz model of human values and individual differences in the two self-regulatory orientations (promotion and prevention) proposed in regulatory focus theory. Findings reveal that prevention-focused self-regulation is positively related to conservation values (security, conformity) and negatively related to values reflecting openness to change (stimulation, self-direction). Moreover, promotion-focused self-regulation was positively related to self-enhancement values (power, achievement) and negatively related to values reflecting self-transcendence (universalism, benevolence). In addition, the observed relations were found using different instruments to measure human values and self-regulatory orientations. In combination, the observed findings support the proposed two-dimensional structure of the value system as well as fundamental assumptions of regulatory focus theory.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0048-5705/2017/0048-57051700004K.pdfhuman valuespreventionpromotionregulatory focusmotivation
spellingShingle Keller Johannes
Kesberg Rebekka
Regulatory focus and human values
Psihologija
human values
prevention
promotion
regulatory focus
motivation
title Regulatory focus and human values
title_full Regulatory focus and human values
title_fullStr Regulatory focus and human values
title_full_unstemmed Regulatory focus and human values
title_short Regulatory focus and human values
title_sort regulatory focus and human values
topic human values
prevention
promotion
regulatory focus
motivation
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0048-5705/2017/0048-57051700004K.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kellerjohannes regulatoryfocusandhumanvalues
AT kesbergrebekka regulatoryfocusandhumanvalues