Using patient-reported outcome measures to assess psychological well-being in a non-representative US general population during the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract Purpose The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychological well-being will likely be long-lasting. Efforts directed towards monitoring the onset and progression of distress and mental health disorders are needed to identify and prioritize at-risk populations. This study assesses the psych...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manraj N. Kaur, Elena Tsangaris, Tanujit Dey, Shelby Deibert, Janina Kueper, Maria Edelen, Andrea L. Pusic
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2022-11-01
Series:Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00526-y
_version_ 1811217674494017536
author Manraj N. Kaur
Elena Tsangaris
Tanujit Dey
Shelby Deibert
Janina Kueper
Maria Edelen
Andrea L. Pusic
author_facet Manraj N. Kaur
Elena Tsangaris
Tanujit Dey
Shelby Deibert
Janina Kueper
Maria Edelen
Andrea L. Pusic
author_sort Manraj N. Kaur
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychological well-being will likely be long-lasting. Efforts directed towards monitoring the onset and progression of distress and mental health disorders are needed to identify and prioritize at-risk populations. This study assesses the psychological well-being of the United States (US) general population during the early phase of the COVID-19 COVID-19 pandemic using validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methods A cross-sectional study design was used. Adults (18 years or older) who could read and write in English were recruited through Prolific in May 2020. Participants completed a REDCap survey including demographic and health-related questions and three PROMs measuring global health (PROMIS-10 Global Health), anxiety [Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7)], and depression [Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)]. A multivariable linear regression was used to identify key factors associated with worse psychological well-being. Results Mean age of the 2023 participants was 31.92 ± 11.57 years (range, 18–82). Participants were mainly White (64.7%, n = 1309), female (52.2%, n = 1057), working full-time before the pandemic (43.5%, n = 879), and completed a college, trade, or university degree (40.7%, n = 823). Most participants reported mild to severe anxiety (57.3%, n = 1158) and depression (60%, n = 1276) on the GAD-7 and PHQ-9, respectively. Patient characteristics associated with worse psychological well-being included: age ≤ 39 years, non-White, female or gender diverse, BMI ≥ 30, uninsured, annual income ≤ $49,999 (USD), lower educational attainment, and belief that COVID-19 is deadlier than flu. Conclusion PROMs can be used to assess and monitor psychological well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic and to inform the planning and delivery of targeted public health interventions to support at-risk populations.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T06:58:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f6e4b19553e3458bbcc889176f5157d7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2509-8020
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T06:58:45Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
spelling doaj.art-f6e4b19553e3458bbcc889176f5157d72022-12-22T03:43:05ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Patient-Reported Outcomes2509-80202022-11-016111310.1186/s41687-022-00526-yUsing patient-reported outcome measures to assess psychological well-being in a non-representative US general population during the COVID-19 pandemicManraj N. Kaur0Elena Tsangaris1Tanujit Dey2Shelby Deibert3Janina Kueper4Maria Edelen5Andrea L. Pusic6Department of Surgery, Patient-Reported Outcomes, Value and Experience (PROVE) Center, Brigham and Women’s HospitalBrigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolCenter for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolMcMaster UniversityDepartment of Surgery, Patient-Reported Outcomes, Value and Experience (PROVE) Center, Brigham and Women’s HospitalBrigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBrigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolAbstract Purpose The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychological well-being will likely be long-lasting. Efforts directed towards monitoring the onset and progression of distress and mental health disorders are needed to identify and prioritize at-risk populations. This study assesses the psychological well-being of the United States (US) general population during the early phase of the COVID-19 COVID-19 pandemic using validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methods A cross-sectional study design was used. Adults (18 years or older) who could read and write in English were recruited through Prolific in May 2020. Participants completed a REDCap survey including demographic and health-related questions and three PROMs measuring global health (PROMIS-10 Global Health), anxiety [Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7)], and depression [Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)]. A multivariable linear regression was used to identify key factors associated with worse psychological well-being. Results Mean age of the 2023 participants was 31.92 ± 11.57 years (range, 18–82). Participants were mainly White (64.7%, n = 1309), female (52.2%, n = 1057), working full-time before the pandemic (43.5%, n = 879), and completed a college, trade, or university degree (40.7%, n = 823). Most participants reported mild to severe anxiety (57.3%, n = 1158) and depression (60%, n = 1276) on the GAD-7 and PHQ-9, respectively. Patient characteristics associated with worse psychological well-being included: age ≤ 39 years, non-White, female or gender diverse, BMI ≥ 30, uninsured, annual income ≤ $49,999 (USD), lower educational attainment, and belief that COVID-19 is deadlier than flu. Conclusion PROMs can be used to assess and monitor psychological well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic and to inform the planning and delivery of targeted public health interventions to support at-risk populations.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00526-yPatient-reported outcome measuresHealth-related quality of lifePsychological well-beingCOVID-19 pandemic
spellingShingle Manraj N. Kaur
Elena Tsangaris
Tanujit Dey
Shelby Deibert
Janina Kueper
Maria Edelen
Andrea L. Pusic
Using patient-reported outcome measures to assess psychological well-being in a non-representative US general population during the COVID-19 pandemic
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Patient-reported outcome measures
Health-related quality of life
Psychological well-being
COVID-19 pandemic
title Using patient-reported outcome measures to assess psychological well-being in a non-representative US general population during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full Using patient-reported outcome measures to assess psychological well-being in a non-representative US general population during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_fullStr Using patient-reported outcome measures to assess psychological well-being in a non-representative US general population during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Using patient-reported outcome measures to assess psychological well-being in a non-representative US general population during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_short Using patient-reported outcome measures to assess psychological well-being in a non-representative US general population during the COVID-19 pandemic
title_sort using patient reported outcome measures to assess psychological well being in a non representative us general population during the covid 19 pandemic
topic Patient-reported outcome measures
Health-related quality of life
Psychological well-being
COVID-19 pandemic
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00526-y
work_keys_str_mv AT manrajnkaur usingpatientreportedoutcomemeasurestoassesspsychologicalwellbeinginanonrepresentativeusgeneralpopulationduringthecovid19pandemic
AT elenatsangaris usingpatientreportedoutcomemeasurestoassesspsychologicalwellbeinginanonrepresentativeusgeneralpopulationduringthecovid19pandemic
AT tanujitdey usingpatientreportedoutcomemeasurestoassesspsychologicalwellbeinginanonrepresentativeusgeneralpopulationduringthecovid19pandemic
AT shelbydeibert usingpatientreportedoutcomemeasurestoassesspsychologicalwellbeinginanonrepresentativeusgeneralpopulationduringthecovid19pandemic
AT janinakueper usingpatientreportedoutcomemeasurestoassesspsychologicalwellbeinginanonrepresentativeusgeneralpopulationduringthecovid19pandemic
AT mariaedelen usingpatientreportedoutcomemeasurestoassesspsychologicalwellbeinginanonrepresentativeusgeneralpopulationduringthecovid19pandemic
AT andrealpusic usingpatientreportedoutcomemeasurestoassesspsychologicalwellbeinginanonrepresentativeusgeneralpopulationduringthecovid19pandemic