Criteria and Indicators to Define Priority Areas for Biodiversity Conservation in Vietnam

Balancing biodiversity conservation with land use for agricultural production is a major societal challenge. Conservation activities must be prioritized since funds and resources for conservation are insufficient in the context of current threats, and conservation competes with other societal priori...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xuan Dinh Vu, Elmar Csaplovics, Christopher Marrs, Trung Thanh Nguyen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-08-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/13/9/1341
_version_ 1797488417740685312
author Xuan Dinh Vu
Elmar Csaplovics
Christopher Marrs
Trung Thanh Nguyen
author_facet Xuan Dinh Vu
Elmar Csaplovics
Christopher Marrs
Trung Thanh Nguyen
author_sort Xuan Dinh Vu
collection DOAJ
description Balancing biodiversity conservation with land use for agricultural production is a major societal challenge. Conservation activities must be prioritized since funds and resources for conservation are insufficient in the context of current threats, and conservation competes with other societal priorities. In order to contribute to conservation priority-setting literature, we applied an environmental model, Pressure–State–Response (PSR), to develop a set of criteria for identifying priority areas for biodiversity conservation in Vietnam. Our empirical data have been compiled from 185 respondents and categorized into three groups: Governmental Administration and Organizations, Universities and Research Institutions, and Protected Areas. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) theory was used to identify the weight of all criteria. Our results show that the priority levels for biodiversity conservation identified by these three factors are 41% for “Pressure”, 26% for “State”, and 33% for “Response”. Based on these three factors, seven criteria and seventeen indicators were developed to determine priority areas for biodiversity conservation. Besides, our study also reveals that the groups of Governmental Administration and organizations and Protected Areas put a focus on the “Pressure” factor, while the group of Universities and Research Institutions emphasized the importance of the “Response” factor in the evaluation process. We suggest that these criteria and indicators be used to identify priority areas for biodiversity conservation in Vietnam.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T00:01:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f6ebdafc2a3e475fbbcbddcc49cb19cf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4907
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T00:01:53Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Forests
spelling doaj.art-f6ebdafc2a3e475fbbcbddcc49cb19cf2023-11-23T16:15:49ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072022-08-01139134110.3390/f13091341Criteria and Indicators to Define Priority Areas for Biodiversity Conservation in VietnamXuan Dinh Vu0Elmar Csaplovics1Christopher Marrs2Trung Thanh Nguyen3College of Land Management and Rural Development, Vietnam National University of Forestry, Hanoi 13417, VietnamInstitute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Technical University of Dresden, 01069 Dresden, GermanyInstitute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Technical University of Dresden, 01069 Dresden, GermanyInstitute of Environmental Economics and World Trade, Leibniz University of Hannover, 30167 Hannover, GermanyBalancing biodiversity conservation with land use for agricultural production is a major societal challenge. Conservation activities must be prioritized since funds and resources for conservation are insufficient in the context of current threats, and conservation competes with other societal priorities. In order to contribute to conservation priority-setting literature, we applied an environmental model, Pressure–State–Response (PSR), to develop a set of criteria for identifying priority areas for biodiversity conservation in Vietnam. Our empirical data have been compiled from 185 respondents and categorized into three groups: Governmental Administration and Organizations, Universities and Research Institutions, and Protected Areas. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) theory was used to identify the weight of all criteria. Our results show that the priority levels for biodiversity conservation identified by these three factors are 41% for “Pressure”, 26% for “State”, and 33% for “Response”. Based on these three factors, seven criteria and seventeen indicators were developed to determine priority areas for biodiversity conservation. Besides, our study also reveals that the groups of Governmental Administration and organizations and Protected Areas put a focus on the “Pressure” factor, while the group of Universities and Research Institutions emphasized the importance of the “Response” factor in the evaluation process. We suggest that these criteria and indicators be used to identify priority areas for biodiversity conservation in Vietnam.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/13/9/1341analytic hierarchy processbiodiversity conservationcondition–pressure–response modelpriority areasVietnam
spellingShingle Xuan Dinh Vu
Elmar Csaplovics
Christopher Marrs
Trung Thanh Nguyen
Criteria and Indicators to Define Priority Areas for Biodiversity Conservation in Vietnam
Forests
analytic hierarchy process
biodiversity conservation
condition–pressure–response model
priority areas
Vietnam
title Criteria and Indicators to Define Priority Areas for Biodiversity Conservation in Vietnam
title_full Criteria and Indicators to Define Priority Areas for Biodiversity Conservation in Vietnam
title_fullStr Criteria and Indicators to Define Priority Areas for Biodiversity Conservation in Vietnam
title_full_unstemmed Criteria and Indicators to Define Priority Areas for Biodiversity Conservation in Vietnam
title_short Criteria and Indicators to Define Priority Areas for Biodiversity Conservation in Vietnam
title_sort criteria and indicators to define priority areas for biodiversity conservation in vietnam
topic analytic hierarchy process
biodiversity conservation
condition–pressure–response model
priority areas
Vietnam
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/13/9/1341
work_keys_str_mv AT xuandinhvu criteriaandindicatorstodefinepriorityareasforbiodiversityconservationinvietnam
AT elmarcsaplovics criteriaandindicatorstodefinepriorityareasforbiodiversityconservationinvietnam
AT christophermarrs criteriaandindicatorstodefinepriorityareasforbiodiversityconservationinvietnam
AT trungthanhnguyen criteriaandindicatorstodefinepriorityareasforbiodiversityconservationinvietnam