A pilot study of hot-wire, ultrasonic and wedge-bellows spirometer inter- and intra-variability
Abstract Objective The aim of this pilot study was to compare spirometric values obtained with different types of spirometers, spirometers of same type, and repeated measurements with the same spirometer in a pulmonary function laboratory setting. Results 12 healthy volunteers performed spirometry o...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-10-01
|
Series: | BMC Research Notes |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-017-2825-0 |
_version_ | 1818894632011956224 |
---|---|
author | Marit E. Aardal Lene L. Svendsen Sverre Lehmann Tomas M. Eagan Ingvild Haaland |
author_facet | Marit E. Aardal Lene L. Svendsen Sverre Lehmann Tomas M. Eagan Ingvild Haaland |
author_sort | Marit E. Aardal |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Objective The aim of this pilot study was to compare spirometric values obtained with different types of spirometers, spirometers of same type, and repeated measurements with the same spirometer in a pulmonary function laboratory setting. Results 12 healthy volunteers performed spirometry on four hot-wire (SensorMedics), two ultrasonic (Spirare) and one wedge-bellows (Vitalograph S) spirometers, according to ATS/ERS (American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society) guidelines. Spirometric values were compared using linear mixed models analysis with a random intercept for subjects and a fixed effect for type of spirometer used. Confidence intervals and p values were adjusted for multiple comparisons. Mean ± SD (L) values for hot-wire, ultrasonic and wedge-bellows spirometers for FVC (forced vital capacity) were 4.02 ± 0.66, 3.69 ± 0.61 and 3.93 ± 0.69, and for FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in one second) 3.06 ± 0.44, 2.95 ± 0.44 and 3.10 ± 0.49. Significant differences were found between hot-wire and ultrasonic and between wedge-bellows and ultrasonic spirometers for FVC and FEV1, and between hot-wire and wedge-bellows spirometers for FVC but not for FEV1. There were no significant differences between spirometers of same type, and low mean differences in repeated measurements for all spirometers included. In conclusion, the pilot study shows systematically higher values for FVC and FEV1 for hot-wire and wedge-bellows compared to ultrasonic spirometers. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-19T18:31:34Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f6f263d664734aeb92193d220d74d73e |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1756-0500 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-19T18:31:34Z |
publishDate | 2017-10-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Research Notes |
spelling | doaj.art-f6f263d664734aeb92193d220d74d73e2022-12-21T20:10:43ZengBMCBMC Research Notes1756-05002017-10-011011710.1186/s13104-017-2825-0A pilot study of hot-wire, ultrasonic and wedge-bellows spirometer inter- and intra-variabilityMarit E. Aardal0Lene L. Svendsen1Sverre Lehmann2Tomas M. Eagan3Ingvild Haaland4Department of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University HospitalDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University HospitalDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University HospitalDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University HospitalDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University HospitalAbstract Objective The aim of this pilot study was to compare spirometric values obtained with different types of spirometers, spirometers of same type, and repeated measurements with the same spirometer in a pulmonary function laboratory setting. Results 12 healthy volunteers performed spirometry on four hot-wire (SensorMedics), two ultrasonic (Spirare) and one wedge-bellows (Vitalograph S) spirometers, according to ATS/ERS (American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society) guidelines. Spirometric values were compared using linear mixed models analysis with a random intercept for subjects and a fixed effect for type of spirometer used. Confidence intervals and p values were adjusted for multiple comparisons. Mean ± SD (L) values for hot-wire, ultrasonic and wedge-bellows spirometers for FVC (forced vital capacity) were 4.02 ± 0.66, 3.69 ± 0.61 and 3.93 ± 0.69, and for FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in one second) 3.06 ± 0.44, 2.95 ± 0.44 and 3.10 ± 0.49. Significant differences were found between hot-wire and ultrasonic and between wedge-bellows and ultrasonic spirometers for FVC and FEV1, and between hot-wire and wedge-bellows spirometers for FVC but not for FEV1. There were no significant differences between spirometers of same type, and low mean differences in repeated measurements for all spirometers included. In conclusion, the pilot study shows systematically higher values for FVC and FEV1 for hot-wire and wedge-bellows compared to ultrasonic spirometers.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-017-2825-0SpirometrySpirometer comparisonUltrasonicHot-wireWedge-bellows |
spellingShingle | Marit E. Aardal Lene L. Svendsen Sverre Lehmann Tomas M. Eagan Ingvild Haaland A pilot study of hot-wire, ultrasonic and wedge-bellows spirometer inter- and intra-variability BMC Research Notes Spirometry Spirometer comparison Ultrasonic Hot-wire Wedge-bellows |
title | A pilot study of hot-wire, ultrasonic and wedge-bellows spirometer inter- and intra-variability |
title_full | A pilot study of hot-wire, ultrasonic and wedge-bellows spirometer inter- and intra-variability |
title_fullStr | A pilot study of hot-wire, ultrasonic and wedge-bellows spirometer inter- and intra-variability |
title_full_unstemmed | A pilot study of hot-wire, ultrasonic and wedge-bellows spirometer inter- and intra-variability |
title_short | A pilot study of hot-wire, ultrasonic and wedge-bellows spirometer inter- and intra-variability |
title_sort | pilot study of hot wire ultrasonic and wedge bellows spirometer inter and intra variability |
topic | Spirometry Spirometer comparison Ultrasonic Hot-wire Wedge-bellows |
url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-017-2825-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mariteaardal apilotstudyofhotwireultrasonicandwedgebellowsspirometerinterandintravariability AT lenelsvendsen apilotstudyofhotwireultrasonicandwedgebellowsspirometerinterandintravariability AT sverrelehmann apilotstudyofhotwireultrasonicandwedgebellowsspirometerinterandintravariability AT tomasmeagan apilotstudyofhotwireultrasonicandwedgebellowsspirometerinterandintravariability AT ingvildhaaland apilotstudyofhotwireultrasonicandwedgebellowsspirometerinterandintravariability AT mariteaardal pilotstudyofhotwireultrasonicandwedgebellowsspirometerinterandintravariability AT lenelsvendsen pilotstudyofhotwireultrasonicandwedgebellowsspirometerinterandintravariability AT sverrelehmann pilotstudyofhotwireultrasonicandwedgebellowsspirometerinterandintravariability AT tomasmeagan pilotstudyofhotwireultrasonicandwedgebellowsspirometerinterandintravariability AT ingvildhaaland pilotstudyofhotwireultrasonicandwedgebellowsspirometerinterandintravariability |