A pilot study of hot-wire, ultrasonic and wedge-bellows spirometer inter- and intra-variability

Abstract Objective The aim of this pilot study was to compare spirometric values obtained with different types of spirometers, spirometers of same type, and repeated measurements with the same spirometer in a pulmonary function laboratory setting. Results 12 healthy volunteers performed spirometry o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marit E. Aardal, Lene L. Svendsen, Sverre Lehmann, Tomas M. Eagan, Ingvild Haaland
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-10-01
Series:BMC Research Notes
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-017-2825-0
_version_ 1818894632011956224
author Marit E. Aardal
Lene L. Svendsen
Sverre Lehmann
Tomas M. Eagan
Ingvild Haaland
author_facet Marit E. Aardal
Lene L. Svendsen
Sverre Lehmann
Tomas M. Eagan
Ingvild Haaland
author_sort Marit E. Aardal
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective The aim of this pilot study was to compare spirometric values obtained with different types of spirometers, spirometers of same type, and repeated measurements with the same spirometer in a pulmonary function laboratory setting. Results 12 healthy volunteers performed spirometry on four hot-wire (SensorMedics), two ultrasonic (Spirare) and one wedge-bellows (Vitalograph S) spirometers, according to ATS/ERS (American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society) guidelines. Spirometric values were compared using linear mixed models analysis with a random intercept for subjects and a fixed effect for type of spirometer used. Confidence intervals and p values were adjusted for multiple comparisons. Mean ± SD (L) values for hot-wire, ultrasonic and wedge-bellows spirometers for FVC (forced vital capacity) were 4.02 ± 0.66, 3.69 ± 0.61 and 3.93 ± 0.69, and for FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in one second) 3.06 ± 0.44, 2.95 ± 0.44 and 3.10 ± 0.49. Significant differences were found between hot-wire and ultrasonic and between wedge-bellows and ultrasonic spirometers for FVC and FEV1, and between hot-wire and wedge-bellows spirometers for FVC but not for FEV1. There were no significant differences between spirometers of same type, and low mean differences in repeated measurements for all spirometers included. In conclusion, the pilot study shows systematically higher values for FVC and FEV1 for hot-wire and wedge-bellows compared to ultrasonic spirometers.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T18:31:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f6f263d664734aeb92193d220d74d73e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1756-0500
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T18:31:34Z
publishDate 2017-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Research Notes
spelling doaj.art-f6f263d664734aeb92193d220d74d73e2022-12-21T20:10:43ZengBMCBMC Research Notes1756-05002017-10-011011710.1186/s13104-017-2825-0A pilot study of hot-wire, ultrasonic and wedge-bellows spirometer inter- and intra-variabilityMarit E. Aardal0Lene L. Svendsen1Sverre Lehmann2Tomas M. Eagan3Ingvild Haaland4Department of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University HospitalDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University HospitalDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University HospitalDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University HospitalDepartment of Thoracic Medicine, Haukeland University HospitalAbstract Objective The aim of this pilot study was to compare spirometric values obtained with different types of spirometers, spirometers of same type, and repeated measurements with the same spirometer in a pulmonary function laboratory setting. Results 12 healthy volunteers performed spirometry on four hot-wire (SensorMedics), two ultrasonic (Spirare) and one wedge-bellows (Vitalograph S) spirometers, according to ATS/ERS (American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society) guidelines. Spirometric values were compared using linear mixed models analysis with a random intercept for subjects and a fixed effect for type of spirometer used. Confidence intervals and p values were adjusted for multiple comparisons. Mean ± SD (L) values for hot-wire, ultrasonic and wedge-bellows spirometers for FVC (forced vital capacity) were 4.02 ± 0.66, 3.69 ± 0.61 and 3.93 ± 0.69, and for FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in one second) 3.06 ± 0.44, 2.95 ± 0.44 and 3.10 ± 0.49. Significant differences were found between hot-wire and ultrasonic and between wedge-bellows and ultrasonic spirometers for FVC and FEV1, and between hot-wire and wedge-bellows spirometers for FVC but not for FEV1. There were no significant differences between spirometers of same type, and low mean differences in repeated measurements for all spirometers included. In conclusion, the pilot study shows systematically higher values for FVC and FEV1 for hot-wire and wedge-bellows compared to ultrasonic spirometers.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-017-2825-0SpirometrySpirometer comparisonUltrasonicHot-wireWedge-bellows
spellingShingle Marit E. Aardal
Lene L. Svendsen
Sverre Lehmann
Tomas M. Eagan
Ingvild Haaland
A pilot study of hot-wire, ultrasonic and wedge-bellows spirometer inter- and intra-variability
BMC Research Notes
Spirometry
Spirometer comparison
Ultrasonic
Hot-wire
Wedge-bellows
title A pilot study of hot-wire, ultrasonic and wedge-bellows spirometer inter- and intra-variability
title_full A pilot study of hot-wire, ultrasonic and wedge-bellows spirometer inter- and intra-variability
title_fullStr A pilot study of hot-wire, ultrasonic and wedge-bellows spirometer inter- and intra-variability
title_full_unstemmed A pilot study of hot-wire, ultrasonic and wedge-bellows spirometer inter- and intra-variability
title_short A pilot study of hot-wire, ultrasonic and wedge-bellows spirometer inter- and intra-variability
title_sort pilot study of hot wire ultrasonic and wedge bellows spirometer inter and intra variability
topic Spirometry
Spirometer comparison
Ultrasonic
Hot-wire
Wedge-bellows
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-017-2825-0
work_keys_str_mv AT mariteaardal apilotstudyofhotwireultrasonicandwedgebellowsspirometerinterandintravariability
AT lenelsvendsen apilotstudyofhotwireultrasonicandwedgebellowsspirometerinterandintravariability
AT sverrelehmann apilotstudyofhotwireultrasonicandwedgebellowsspirometerinterandintravariability
AT tomasmeagan apilotstudyofhotwireultrasonicandwedgebellowsspirometerinterandintravariability
AT ingvildhaaland apilotstudyofhotwireultrasonicandwedgebellowsspirometerinterandintravariability
AT mariteaardal pilotstudyofhotwireultrasonicandwedgebellowsspirometerinterandintravariability
AT lenelsvendsen pilotstudyofhotwireultrasonicandwedgebellowsspirometerinterandintravariability
AT sverrelehmann pilotstudyofhotwireultrasonicandwedgebellowsspirometerinterandintravariability
AT tomasmeagan pilotstudyofhotwireultrasonicandwedgebellowsspirometerinterandintravariability
AT ingvildhaaland pilotstudyofhotwireultrasonicandwedgebellowsspirometerinterandintravariability