Comparison of biventricular myocardial strain according to treatment regimens in patients discharged after COVID-19 recovery

Purpose: The effects of different COVID-19 therapeutic strategies on cardiac function are uncertain. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of different medical treatments on biventricular function in patients who had recovered from COVID-19. Materials and Methods: Speckle-tracking echo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alpay Medetalibeyoğlu, Ekrem Bilal Karaayvaz, Yunus Çatma, Huzeyfe Arıcı, Derya Baykız, Mustafa Altınkaynak, Pelin Karaca Özer, Elif Ayduk Govdelı
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cukurova University 2022-09-01
Series:Cukurova Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2331014
_version_ 1797907954495651840
author Alpay Medetalibeyoğlu
Ekrem Bilal Karaayvaz
Yunus Çatma
Huzeyfe Arıcı
Derya Baykız
Mustafa Altınkaynak
Pelin Karaca Özer
Elif Ayduk Govdelı
author_facet Alpay Medetalibeyoğlu
Ekrem Bilal Karaayvaz
Yunus Çatma
Huzeyfe Arıcı
Derya Baykız
Mustafa Altınkaynak
Pelin Karaca Özer
Elif Ayduk Govdelı
author_sort Alpay Medetalibeyoğlu
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: The effects of different COVID-19 therapeutic strategies on cardiac function are uncertain. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of different medical treatments on biventricular function in patients who had recovered from COVID-19. Materials and Methods: Speckle-tracking echocardiography was performed to examine the biventricular myocardial function of patients at follow-up visits after recovery from COVID-19. The patients were divided into two groups based on the medication they used during the active disease: favipiravir (FAV; n = 60) or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ; n = 60). A comparison was made with risk factor–matched controls (n = 41). Results: A total of 161 patients were included in the study. The left ventricular end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, end-diastolic diameter, and end-systolic diameter were higher in the HCQ and FAV groups compared to the controls, while the left ventricular ejection fraction was similar between all the groups. The right ventricular diameter was increased, and the systolic pulmonary artery pressure was higher in the HCQ and FAV groups compared to the controls. The left ventricular global longitudinal strain (-18±6.6 vs. -19.7±4.4 vs. -20.4±5, respectively), the right ventricular global longitudinal strain (-19.8±7.5 vs. -22.2±6 vs. -23.4±6.2, respectively), and the right ventricular free wall strain (-16.9±3.6 vs. -18.2±2.4 vs. -19.6±4.7, respectively) were worse in the HCQ group compared to the FAV and control groups. Conclusion: This study found echocardiographic evidence of subclinical cardiac involvement in both the HCQ and FAV groups compared to the controls. However, HCQ treatment was associated with an increased risk of biventricular subclinical systolic dysfunction in COVID-19 survivors compared with FAV treatment.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T10:44:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f7267af49f7b4ce9b4f01c6851573611
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2602-3040
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T10:44:58Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Cukurova University
record_format Article
series Cukurova Medical Journal
spelling doaj.art-f7267af49f7b4ce9b4f01c68515736112023-02-15T16:20:21ZengCukurova UniversityCukurova Medical Journal2602-30402022-09-014731005101410.17826/cumj.109299848Comparison of biventricular myocardial strain according to treatment regimens in patients discharged after COVID-19 recoveryAlpay Medetalibeyoğlu0Ekrem Bilal Karaayvaz1Yunus Çatma2Huzeyfe Arıcı3Derya Baykız4Mustafa Altınkaynak5Pelin Karaca Özer6Elif Ayduk Govdelı7İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL TIP FAKÜLTESİ, DAHİLİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜİSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL TIP FAKÜLTESİ, DAHİLİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, KARDİYOLOJİ ANABİLİM DALIİSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL TIP FAKÜLTESİ, DAHİLİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜİSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL TIP FAKÜLTESİ, DAHİLİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜİSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL TIP FAKÜLTESİ, DAHİLİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, KARDİYOLOJİ ANABİLİM DALIİSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL TIP FAKÜLTESİ, DAHİLİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜİSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL TIP FAKÜLTESİ, DAHİLİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, KARDİYOLOJİ ANABİLİM DALIİSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL TIP FAKÜLTESİ, DAHİLİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, KARDİYOLOJİ ANABİLİM DALIPurpose: The effects of different COVID-19 therapeutic strategies on cardiac function are uncertain. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of different medical treatments on biventricular function in patients who had recovered from COVID-19. Materials and Methods: Speckle-tracking echocardiography was performed to examine the biventricular myocardial function of patients at follow-up visits after recovery from COVID-19. The patients were divided into two groups based on the medication they used during the active disease: favipiravir (FAV; n = 60) or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ; n = 60). A comparison was made with risk factor–matched controls (n = 41). Results: A total of 161 patients were included in the study. The left ventricular end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, end-diastolic diameter, and end-systolic diameter were higher in the HCQ and FAV groups compared to the controls, while the left ventricular ejection fraction was similar between all the groups. The right ventricular diameter was increased, and the systolic pulmonary artery pressure was higher in the HCQ and FAV groups compared to the controls. The left ventricular global longitudinal strain (-18±6.6 vs. -19.7±4.4 vs. -20.4±5, respectively), the right ventricular global longitudinal strain (-19.8±7.5 vs. -22.2±6 vs. -23.4±6.2, respectively), and the right ventricular free wall strain (-16.9±3.6 vs. -18.2±2.4 vs. -19.6±4.7, respectively) were worse in the HCQ group compared to the FAV and control groups. Conclusion: This study found echocardiographic evidence of subclinical cardiac involvement in both the HCQ and FAV groups compared to the controls. However, HCQ treatment was associated with an increased risk of biventricular subclinical systolic dysfunction in COVID-19 survivors compared with FAV treatment.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2331014covid-19recoveryfavipiravirhydroxychloroquinespeckle tracking echocardiographycovid-19iyileşmefavipiravirhidroksiklorokinbenek izleme ekokardiyografi.
spellingShingle Alpay Medetalibeyoğlu
Ekrem Bilal Karaayvaz
Yunus Çatma
Huzeyfe Arıcı
Derya Baykız
Mustafa Altınkaynak
Pelin Karaca Özer
Elif Ayduk Govdelı
Comparison of biventricular myocardial strain according to treatment regimens in patients discharged after COVID-19 recovery
Cukurova Medical Journal
covid-19
recovery
favipiravir
hydroxychloroquine
speckle tracking echocardiography
covid-19
iyileşme
favipiravir
hidroksiklorokin
benek izleme ekokardiyografi.
title Comparison of biventricular myocardial strain according to treatment regimens in patients discharged after COVID-19 recovery
title_full Comparison of biventricular myocardial strain according to treatment regimens in patients discharged after COVID-19 recovery
title_fullStr Comparison of biventricular myocardial strain according to treatment regimens in patients discharged after COVID-19 recovery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of biventricular myocardial strain according to treatment regimens in patients discharged after COVID-19 recovery
title_short Comparison of biventricular myocardial strain according to treatment regimens in patients discharged after COVID-19 recovery
title_sort comparison of biventricular myocardial strain according to treatment regimens in patients discharged after covid 19 recovery
topic covid-19
recovery
favipiravir
hydroxychloroquine
speckle tracking echocardiography
covid-19
iyileşme
favipiravir
hidroksiklorokin
benek izleme ekokardiyografi.
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2331014
work_keys_str_mv AT alpaymedetalibeyoglu comparisonofbiventricularmyocardialstrainaccordingtotreatmentregimensinpatientsdischargedaftercovid19recovery
AT ekrembilalkaraayvaz comparisonofbiventricularmyocardialstrainaccordingtotreatmentregimensinpatientsdischargedaftercovid19recovery
AT yunuscatma comparisonofbiventricularmyocardialstrainaccordingtotreatmentregimensinpatientsdischargedaftercovid19recovery
AT huzeyfearıcı comparisonofbiventricularmyocardialstrainaccordingtotreatmentregimensinpatientsdischargedaftercovid19recovery
AT deryabaykız comparisonofbiventricularmyocardialstrainaccordingtotreatmentregimensinpatientsdischargedaftercovid19recovery
AT mustafaaltınkaynak comparisonofbiventricularmyocardialstrainaccordingtotreatmentregimensinpatientsdischargedaftercovid19recovery
AT pelinkaracaozer comparisonofbiventricularmyocardialstrainaccordingtotreatmentregimensinpatientsdischargedaftercovid19recovery
AT elifaydukgovdelı comparisonofbiventricularmyocardialstrainaccordingtotreatmentregimensinpatientsdischargedaftercovid19recovery