Management of Orbital Masses: Outcomes of Endoscopic and Combined Approaches With No Orbital Reconstruction

Introduction The endoscopic endonasal approach to management of orbital pathology has expanded. Due to the rarity of these conditions, most reports in the literature consist of small case reports. We report a series from a single institution with a focus on outcomes. Methods A retrospective chart re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ryan A. Rimmer MD, Alexander E. Graf BA, Judd H. Fastenberg MD, Jurij Bilyk MD, Gurston G. Nyquist MD, Marc R. Rosen MD, Michael P. Rabinowitz MD, Mindy R. Rabinowitz MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-01-01
Series:Allergy & Rhinology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2152656719899922
_version_ 1818339782022922240
author Ryan A. Rimmer MD
Alexander E. Graf BA
Judd H. Fastenberg MD
Jurij Bilyk MD
Gurston G. Nyquist MD
Marc R. Rosen MD
Michael P. Rabinowitz MD
Mindy R. Rabinowitz MD
author_facet Ryan A. Rimmer MD
Alexander E. Graf BA
Judd H. Fastenberg MD
Jurij Bilyk MD
Gurston G. Nyquist MD
Marc R. Rosen MD
Michael P. Rabinowitz MD
Mindy R. Rabinowitz MD
author_sort Ryan A. Rimmer MD
collection DOAJ
description Introduction The endoscopic endonasal approach to management of orbital pathology has expanded. Due to the rarity of these conditions, most reports in the literature consist of small case reports. We report a series from a single institution with a focus on outcomes. Methods A retrospective chart review was carried out between 2010 and 2018. Results Twenty-four patients were identified (average age 58 years, 15 males, 9 females). Average follow-up was 14.9 months. Most common etiologies included cavernous hemangioma (7), metastases (6), idiopathic orbital inflammatory syndrome (6), orbital hematoma/clot (2), and schwannoma (1). Most common presenting symptoms were decreased visual acuity (8), proptosis (8), diplopia (7), and incidental findings (2). All patients underwent endoscopic medial wall orbital decompressions. Sixteen involved a combined open approach by an ophthalmologist. Pathology was either biopsied (15), resected (6), or could not be identified (3). No intraoperative complications were noted. No patients underwent orbital reconstruction of the medial wall. Six patients developed postoperative sinusitis successfully managed with antibiotics. One patient developed epistaxis managed conservatively. In 5 patients, Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 scores increased immediately postop and then decreased, whereas scores only decreased in 6 patients. Six patients noted reduced proptosis. There were no new cases of diplopia or worsening visual acuity. Conclusions A combined endoscopic endonasal and external approach can be useful for managing orbital lesions. Patients tolerated the procedure well with improvement in ocular symptoms and minimal sinonasal complications. Reconstruction of the medial wall may not be warranted to prevent postoperative diplopia.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T15:32:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f72978fdbfed4ed49d7b3f60e3e0a5c0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2152-6567
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T15:32:28Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Allergy & Rhinology
spelling doaj.art-f72978fdbfed4ed49d7b3f60e3e0a5c02022-12-21T23:40:08ZengSAGE PublishingAllergy & Rhinology2152-65672020-01-011110.1177/2152656719899922Management of Orbital Masses: Outcomes of Endoscopic and Combined Approaches With No Orbital ReconstructionRyan A. Rimmer MDAlexander E. Graf BAJudd H. Fastenberg MDJurij Bilyk MDGurston G. Nyquist MDMarc R. Rosen MDMichael P. Rabinowitz MDMindy R. Rabinowitz MDIntroduction The endoscopic endonasal approach to management of orbital pathology has expanded. Due to the rarity of these conditions, most reports in the literature consist of small case reports. We report a series from a single institution with a focus on outcomes. Methods A retrospective chart review was carried out between 2010 and 2018. Results Twenty-four patients were identified (average age 58 years, 15 males, 9 females). Average follow-up was 14.9 months. Most common etiologies included cavernous hemangioma (7), metastases (6), idiopathic orbital inflammatory syndrome (6), orbital hematoma/clot (2), and schwannoma (1). Most common presenting symptoms were decreased visual acuity (8), proptosis (8), diplopia (7), and incidental findings (2). All patients underwent endoscopic medial wall orbital decompressions. Sixteen involved a combined open approach by an ophthalmologist. Pathology was either biopsied (15), resected (6), or could not be identified (3). No intraoperative complications were noted. No patients underwent orbital reconstruction of the medial wall. Six patients developed postoperative sinusitis successfully managed with antibiotics. One patient developed epistaxis managed conservatively. In 5 patients, Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 scores increased immediately postop and then decreased, whereas scores only decreased in 6 patients. Six patients noted reduced proptosis. There were no new cases of diplopia or worsening visual acuity. Conclusions A combined endoscopic endonasal and external approach can be useful for managing orbital lesions. Patients tolerated the procedure well with improvement in ocular symptoms and minimal sinonasal complications. Reconstruction of the medial wall may not be warranted to prevent postoperative diplopia.https://doi.org/10.1177/2152656719899922
spellingShingle Ryan A. Rimmer MD
Alexander E. Graf BA
Judd H. Fastenberg MD
Jurij Bilyk MD
Gurston G. Nyquist MD
Marc R. Rosen MD
Michael P. Rabinowitz MD
Mindy R. Rabinowitz MD
Management of Orbital Masses: Outcomes of Endoscopic and Combined Approaches With No Orbital Reconstruction
Allergy & Rhinology
title Management of Orbital Masses: Outcomes of Endoscopic and Combined Approaches With No Orbital Reconstruction
title_full Management of Orbital Masses: Outcomes of Endoscopic and Combined Approaches With No Orbital Reconstruction
title_fullStr Management of Orbital Masses: Outcomes of Endoscopic and Combined Approaches With No Orbital Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Management of Orbital Masses: Outcomes of Endoscopic and Combined Approaches With No Orbital Reconstruction
title_short Management of Orbital Masses: Outcomes of Endoscopic and Combined Approaches With No Orbital Reconstruction
title_sort management of orbital masses outcomes of endoscopic and combined approaches with no orbital reconstruction
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2152656719899922
work_keys_str_mv AT ryanarimmermd managementoforbitalmassesoutcomesofendoscopicandcombinedapproacheswithnoorbitalreconstruction
AT alexanderegrafba managementoforbitalmassesoutcomesofendoscopicandcombinedapproacheswithnoorbitalreconstruction
AT juddhfastenbergmd managementoforbitalmassesoutcomesofendoscopicandcombinedapproacheswithnoorbitalreconstruction
AT jurijbilykmd managementoforbitalmassesoutcomesofendoscopicandcombinedapproacheswithnoorbitalreconstruction
AT gurstongnyquistmd managementoforbitalmassesoutcomesofendoscopicandcombinedapproacheswithnoorbitalreconstruction
AT marcrrosenmd managementoforbitalmassesoutcomesofendoscopicandcombinedapproacheswithnoorbitalreconstruction
AT michaelprabinowitzmd managementoforbitalmassesoutcomesofendoscopicandcombinedapproacheswithnoorbitalreconstruction
AT mindyrrabinowitzmd managementoforbitalmassesoutcomesofendoscopicandcombinedapproacheswithnoorbitalreconstruction