Kesalahan Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Tipe Pisa
This study aimed to determine student errors and the factors that caused students to make mistakes in solving PISA-type math problems. Error analysis was carried out based on Newman's analysis through tests and interviews. This research was conducted in one of the junior high schools in the Pr...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Indonesian |
Published: |
UNMUHBABEL PRESS
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Inovasi Matematika |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://inomatika.unmuhbabel.ac.id/index.php/inomatika/article/view/258 |
_version_ | 1797260040255569920 |
---|---|
author | Jihan Della Safegi Hapizah Hapizah Cecil Hiltrimartin Made Sukaryawan Kodri Madang Ketang Wiyono Yenny Anwar |
author_facet | Jihan Della Safegi Hapizah Hapizah Cecil Hiltrimartin Made Sukaryawan Kodri Madang Ketang Wiyono Yenny Anwar |
author_sort | Jihan Della Safegi |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
This study aimed to determine student errors and the factors that caused students to make mistakes in solving PISA-type math problems. Error analysis was carried out based on Newman's analysis through tests and interviews. This research was conducted in one of the junior high schools in the Province of the Bangka Belitung Islands, involving 26 students. Subjects were selected based on a purposive sampling technique with three considerations: academic ability, teacher recommendations, and student willingness. This study used the descriptive qualitative method. The PISA math test questions tested consisted of change and relationship, space and shape, quantity and uncertainty, and data content. The results showed that reading errors were 40.21%, comprehension errors were 41.86%, transformation errors were 87.29%, process skill error is 90.26%, and the answer writing error is 88.46%. While uncertain and data is the content with the most significant error percentage, which is 82.31%. In general, errors were caused by students who cannot relate PISA questions to the material they usually study, and students were not accustomed to working on PISA questions.
|
first_indexed | 2024-04-24T23:19:00Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f73b26b7f4384a5f8e74cb9f18ffbec1 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2656-7431 2656-7245 |
language | Indonesian |
last_indexed | 2024-04-24T23:19:00Z |
publishDate | 2021-07-01 |
publisher | UNMUHBABEL PRESS |
record_format | Article |
series | Inovasi Matematika |
spelling | doaj.art-f73b26b7f4384a5f8e74cb9f18ffbec12024-03-17T07:31:30ZindUNMUHBABEL PRESSInovasi Matematika2656-74312656-72452021-07-013210.35438/inomatika.v3i2.258258Kesalahan Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Tipe PisaJihan Della SafegiHapizah Hapizah0Cecil Hiltrimartin1Made Sukaryawan2Kodri Madang3Ketang Wiyono4Yenny Anwar5Sriwijaya UniversitySriwijaya UniversityPendidikan Kimia, Universitas Sriwijaya, IndonesiaPendidikan Biologi, Universitas Sriwijaya, IndonesiaPendidikan Fisika, Universitas Sriwijaya, IndonesiaPendidikan Biologi, Universitas Sriwijaya, Indonesia This study aimed to determine student errors and the factors that caused students to make mistakes in solving PISA-type math problems. Error analysis was carried out based on Newman's analysis through tests and interviews. This research was conducted in one of the junior high schools in the Province of the Bangka Belitung Islands, involving 26 students. Subjects were selected based on a purposive sampling technique with three considerations: academic ability, teacher recommendations, and student willingness. This study used the descriptive qualitative method. The PISA math test questions tested consisted of change and relationship, space and shape, quantity and uncertainty, and data content. The results showed that reading errors were 40.21%, comprehension errors were 41.86%, transformation errors were 87.29%, process skill error is 90.26%, and the answer writing error is 88.46%. While uncertain and data is the content with the most significant error percentage, which is 82.31%. In general, errors were caused by students who cannot relate PISA questions to the material they usually study, and students were not accustomed to working on PISA questions. https://inomatika.unmuhbabel.ac.id/index.php/inomatika/article/view/258Newman AnalysisStudent MistakePISA |
spellingShingle | Jihan Della Safegi Hapizah Hapizah Cecil Hiltrimartin Made Sukaryawan Kodri Madang Ketang Wiyono Yenny Anwar Kesalahan Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Tipe Pisa Inovasi Matematika Newman Analysis Student Mistake PISA |
title | Kesalahan Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Tipe Pisa |
title_full | Kesalahan Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Tipe Pisa |
title_fullStr | Kesalahan Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Tipe Pisa |
title_full_unstemmed | Kesalahan Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Tipe Pisa |
title_short | Kesalahan Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Tipe Pisa |
title_sort | kesalahan siswa sekolah menengah pertama dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika tipe pisa |
topic | Newman Analysis Student Mistake PISA |
url | https://inomatika.unmuhbabel.ac.id/index.php/inomatika/article/view/258 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jihandellasafegi kesalahansiswasekolahmenengahpertamadalammenyelesaikansoalmatematikatipepisa AT hapizahhapizah kesalahansiswasekolahmenengahpertamadalammenyelesaikansoalmatematikatipepisa AT cecilhiltrimartin kesalahansiswasekolahmenengahpertamadalammenyelesaikansoalmatematikatipepisa AT madesukaryawan kesalahansiswasekolahmenengahpertamadalammenyelesaikansoalmatematikatipepisa AT kodrimadang kesalahansiswasekolahmenengahpertamadalammenyelesaikansoalmatematikatipepisa AT ketangwiyono kesalahansiswasekolahmenengahpertamadalammenyelesaikansoalmatematikatipepisa AT yennyanwar kesalahansiswasekolahmenengahpertamadalammenyelesaikansoalmatematikatipepisa |