Kesalahan Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Tipe Pisa

This study aimed to determine student errors and the factors that caused students to make mistakes in solving PISA-type math problems. Error analysis was carried out based on Newman's analysis through tests and interviews. This research was conducted in one of the junior high schools in the Pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jihan Della Safegi, Hapizah Hapizah, Cecil Hiltrimartin, Made Sukaryawan, Kodri Madang, Ketang Wiyono, Yenny Anwar
Format: Article
Language:Indonesian
Published: UNMUHBABEL PRESS 2021-07-01
Series:Inovasi Matematika
Subjects:
Online Access:https://inomatika.unmuhbabel.ac.id/index.php/inomatika/article/view/258
_version_ 1797260040255569920
author Jihan Della Safegi
Hapizah Hapizah
Cecil Hiltrimartin
Made Sukaryawan
Kodri Madang
Ketang Wiyono
Yenny Anwar
author_facet Jihan Della Safegi
Hapizah Hapizah
Cecil Hiltrimartin
Made Sukaryawan
Kodri Madang
Ketang Wiyono
Yenny Anwar
author_sort Jihan Della Safegi
collection DOAJ
description This study aimed to determine student errors and the factors that caused students to make mistakes in solving PISA-type math problems. Error analysis was carried out based on Newman's analysis through tests and interviews. This research was conducted in one of the junior high schools in the Province of the Bangka Belitung Islands, involving 26 students. Subjects were selected based on a purposive sampling technique with three considerations: academic ability, teacher recommendations, and student willingness. This study used the descriptive qualitative method. The PISA math test questions tested consisted of change and relationship, space and shape, quantity and uncertainty, and data content. The results showed that reading errors were 40.21%, comprehension errors were 41.86%, transformation errors were 87.29%, process skill error is 90.26%, and the answer writing error is 88.46%. While uncertain and data is the content with the most significant error percentage, which is 82.31%. In general, errors were caused by students who cannot relate PISA questions to the material they usually study, and students were not accustomed to working on PISA questions.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T23:19:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f73b26b7f4384a5f8e74cb9f18ffbec1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2656-7431
2656-7245
language Indonesian
last_indexed 2024-04-24T23:19:00Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher UNMUHBABEL PRESS
record_format Article
series Inovasi Matematika
spelling doaj.art-f73b26b7f4384a5f8e74cb9f18ffbec12024-03-17T07:31:30ZindUNMUHBABEL PRESSInovasi Matematika2656-74312656-72452021-07-013210.35438/inomatika.v3i2.258258Kesalahan Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Tipe PisaJihan Della SafegiHapizah Hapizah0Cecil Hiltrimartin1Made Sukaryawan2Kodri Madang3Ketang Wiyono4Yenny Anwar5Sriwijaya UniversitySriwijaya UniversityPendidikan Kimia, Universitas Sriwijaya, IndonesiaPendidikan Biologi, Universitas Sriwijaya, IndonesiaPendidikan Fisika, Universitas Sriwijaya, IndonesiaPendidikan Biologi, Universitas Sriwijaya, Indonesia This study aimed to determine student errors and the factors that caused students to make mistakes in solving PISA-type math problems. Error analysis was carried out based on Newman's analysis through tests and interviews. This research was conducted in one of the junior high schools in the Province of the Bangka Belitung Islands, involving 26 students. Subjects were selected based on a purposive sampling technique with three considerations: academic ability, teacher recommendations, and student willingness. This study used the descriptive qualitative method. The PISA math test questions tested consisted of change and relationship, space and shape, quantity and uncertainty, and data content. The results showed that reading errors were 40.21%, comprehension errors were 41.86%, transformation errors were 87.29%, process skill error is 90.26%, and the answer writing error is 88.46%. While uncertain and data is the content with the most significant error percentage, which is 82.31%. In general, errors were caused by students who cannot relate PISA questions to the material they usually study, and students were not accustomed to working on PISA questions. https://inomatika.unmuhbabel.ac.id/index.php/inomatika/article/view/258Newman AnalysisStudent MistakePISA
spellingShingle Jihan Della Safegi
Hapizah Hapizah
Cecil Hiltrimartin
Made Sukaryawan
Kodri Madang
Ketang Wiyono
Yenny Anwar
Kesalahan Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Tipe Pisa
Inovasi Matematika
Newman Analysis
Student Mistake
PISA
title Kesalahan Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Tipe Pisa
title_full Kesalahan Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Tipe Pisa
title_fullStr Kesalahan Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Tipe Pisa
title_full_unstemmed Kesalahan Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Tipe Pisa
title_short Kesalahan Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Tipe Pisa
title_sort kesalahan siswa sekolah menengah pertama dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika tipe pisa
topic Newman Analysis
Student Mistake
PISA
url https://inomatika.unmuhbabel.ac.id/index.php/inomatika/article/view/258
work_keys_str_mv AT jihandellasafegi kesalahansiswasekolahmenengahpertamadalammenyelesaikansoalmatematikatipepisa
AT hapizahhapizah kesalahansiswasekolahmenengahpertamadalammenyelesaikansoalmatematikatipepisa
AT cecilhiltrimartin kesalahansiswasekolahmenengahpertamadalammenyelesaikansoalmatematikatipepisa
AT madesukaryawan kesalahansiswasekolahmenengahpertamadalammenyelesaikansoalmatematikatipepisa
AT kodrimadang kesalahansiswasekolahmenengahpertamadalammenyelesaikansoalmatematikatipepisa
AT ketangwiyono kesalahansiswasekolahmenengahpertamadalammenyelesaikansoalmatematikatipepisa
AT yennyanwar kesalahansiswasekolahmenengahpertamadalammenyelesaikansoalmatematikatipepisa