Evaluating Payments for Environmental Services: Methodological Challenges.
Over the last fifteen years, Payments for Environmental Services (PES) schemes have become very popular environmental policy instruments, but the academic literature has begun to question their additionality. The literature attempts to estimate the causal effect of these programs by applying impact...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2016-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4766196?pdf=render |
| _version_ | 1811280148402536448 |
|---|---|
| author | Gwenolé Le Velly Céline Dutilly |
| author_facet | Gwenolé Le Velly Céline Dutilly |
| author_sort | Gwenolé Le Velly |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Over the last fifteen years, Payments for Environmental Services (PES) schemes have become very popular environmental policy instruments, but the academic literature has begun to question their additionality. The literature attempts to estimate the causal effect of these programs by applying impact evaluation (IE) techniques. However, PES programs are complex instruments and IE methods cannot be directly applied without adjustments. Based on a systematic review of the literature, this article proposes a framework for the methodological process of designing an IE for PES schemes. It revises and discusses the methodological choices at each step of the process and proposes guidelines for practitioners. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-13T01:08:19Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f741c1df71bf4a63a785cce1fd3c02c1 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-13T01:08:19Z |
| publishDate | 2016-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-f741c1df71bf4a63a785cce1fd3c02c12022-12-22T03:09:16ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01112e014937410.1371/journal.pone.0149374Evaluating Payments for Environmental Services: Methodological Challenges.Gwenolé Le VellyCéline DutillyOver the last fifteen years, Payments for Environmental Services (PES) schemes have become very popular environmental policy instruments, but the academic literature has begun to question their additionality. The literature attempts to estimate the causal effect of these programs by applying impact evaluation (IE) techniques. However, PES programs are complex instruments and IE methods cannot be directly applied without adjustments. Based on a systematic review of the literature, this article proposes a framework for the methodological process of designing an IE for PES schemes. It revises and discusses the methodological choices at each step of the process and proposes guidelines for practitioners.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4766196?pdf=render |
| spellingShingle | Gwenolé Le Velly Céline Dutilly Evaluating Payments for Environmental Services: Methodological Challenges. PLoS ONE |
| title | Evaluating Payments for Environmental Services: Methodological Challenges. |
| title_full | Evaluating Payments for Environmental Services: Methodological Challenges. |
| title_fullStr | Evaluating Payments for Environmental Services: Methodological Challenges. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Payments for Environmental Services: Methodological Challenges. |
| title_short | Evaluating Payments for Environmental Services: Methodological Challenges. |
| title_sort | evaluating payments for environmental services methodological challenges |
| url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4766196?pdf=render |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gwenolelevelly evaluatingpaymentsforenvironmentalservicesmethodologicalchallenges AT celinedutilly evaluatingpaymentsforenvironmentalservicesmethodologicalchallenges |