Comparison between ocular biometry parameters in patients with unilateral congenital glaucoma

Purpose: To compare the axial length (AL) and corneal diameter between glaucomatous eye (GE) and fellow normal eye (NE) in patients with unilateral congenital glaucoma and to obtain a normative database for ocular growth among Indian children below 3 years of age. Methods: Retrospective longitudinal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Premanand Chandran, Chavan Sneha, Sunada Subramanian, Ganesh V Raman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2023;volume=71;issue=8;spage=2962;epage=2966;aulast=Chandran
_version_ 1797649334744907776
author Premanand Chandran
Chavan Sneha
Sunada Subramanian
Ganesh V Raman
author_facet Premanand Chandran
Chavan Sneha
Sunada Subramanian
Ganesh V Raman
author_sort Premanand Chandran
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: To compare the axial length (AL) and corneal diameter between glaucomatous eye (GE) and fellow normal eye (NE) in patients with unilateral congenital glaucoma and to obtain a normative database for ocular growth among Indian children below 3 years of age. Methods: Retrospective longitudinal study. Patients who had a follow-up of 3 years from diagnosis with ocular biometry parameters being recorded at least thrice (once a year) and fellow eye being normal were included. Data collected were age, gender, intraocular pressure (IOP), AL, corneal diameter, optic disc findings, diagnosis, and surgery details. Results: Eleven patients were analyzed. All GE underwent combined trabeculotomy with trabeculectomy. Mean (SD) baseline IOP, AL, and corneal diameter were 17.1 (6.7) mmHg, 18.9 (1.1) mm and 12 (0.91) mm in GE, and 11.1 (3.8) mmHg, 17.8 (0.44) mm, and 10.5 (0.58) mm in NE, respectively. Increase in AL was 3.1 mm in the first year followed by 0.6 mm in second year and 0.4 mm in third year in GE compared to 2.6, 0.6, and 0.5 mm in NE, respectively. Corneal diameter increased by 1.1 mm in GE in the first year and remained stable thereafter compared to 0.7 mm in first year followed by 0.3 mm in second year and stable thereafter in NE. The percentage of success was 73% at 3 years. Conclusion: Axial length and corneal diameter were higher in GE than NE at all-time points. With prompt intervention, the growth curve of the GE was made parallel to that of NE.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T15:45:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f74c4a0e46414fe98d4e4a6fbf24d8c0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0301-4738
1998-3689
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T15:45:39Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-f74c4a0e46414fe98d4e4a6fbf24d8c02023-10-26T06:49:07ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47381998-36892023-01-017182962296610.4103/IJO.IJO_122_23Comparison between ocular biometry parameters in patients with unilateral congenital glaucomaPremanand ChandranChavan SnehaSunada SubramanianGanesh V RamanPurpose: To compare the axial length (AL) and corneal diameter between glaucomatous eye (GE) and fellow normal eye (NE) in patients with unilateral congenital glaucoma and to obtain a normative database for ocular growth among Indian children below 3 years of age. Methods: Retrospective longitudinal study. Patients who had a follow-up of 3 years from diagnosis with ocular biometry parameters being recorded at least thrice (once a year) and fellow eye being normal were included. Data collected were age, gender, intraocular pressure (IOP), AL, corneal diameter, optic disc findings, diagnosis, and surgery details. Results: Eleven patients were analyzed. All GE underwent combined trabeculotomy with trabeculectomy. Mean (SD) baseline IOP, AL, and corneal diameter were 17.1 (6.7) mmHg, 18.9 (1.1) mm and 12 (0.91) mm in GE, and 11.1 (3.8) mmHg, 17.8 (0.44) mm, and 10.5 (0.58) mm in NE, respectively. Increase in AL was 3.1 mm in the first year followed by 0.6 mm in second year and 0.4 mm in third year in GE compared to 2.6, 0.6, and 0.5 mm in NE, respectively. Corneal diameter increased by 1.1 mm in GE in the first year and remained stable thereafter compared to 0.7 mm in first year followed by 0.3 mm in second year and stable thereafter in NE. The percentage of success was 73% at 3 years. Conclusion: Axial length and corneal diameter were higher in GE than NE at all-time points. With prompt intervention, the growth curve of the GE was made parallel to that of NE.http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2023;volume=71;issue=8;spage=2962;epage=2966;aulast=Chandranaxial lengthcongenital glaucomacorneal diameterintraocular pressure
spellingShingle Premanand Chandran
Chavan Sneha
Sunada Subramanian
Ganesh V Raman
Comparison between ocular biometry parameters in patients with unilateral congenital glaucoma
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
axial length
congenital glaucoma
corneal diameter
intraocular pressure
title Comparison between ocular biometry parameters in patients with unilateral congenital glaucoma
title_full Comparison between ocular biometry parameters in patients with unilateral congenital glaucoma
title_fullStr Comparison between ocular biometry parameters in patients with unilateral congenital glaucoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between ocular biometry parameters in patients with unilateral congenital glaucoma
title_short Comparison between ocular biometry parameters in patients with unilateral congenital glaucoma
title_sort comparison between ocular biometry parameters in patients with unilateral congenital glaucoma
topic axial length
congenital glaucoma
corneal diameter
intraocular pressure
url http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2023;volume=71;issue=8;spage=2962;epage=2966;aulast=Chandran
work_keys_str_mv AT premanandchandran comparisonbetweenocularbiometryparametersinpatientswithunilateralcongenitalglaucoma
AT chavansneha comparisonbetweenocularbiometryparametersinpatientswithunilateralcongenitalglaucoma
AT sunadasubramanian comparisonbetweenocularbiometryparametersinpatientswithunilateralcongenitalglaucoma
AT ganeshvraman comparisonbetweenocularbiometryparametersinpatientswithunilateralcongenitalglaucoma