Ingarden vs. Meinong on Ficta’s Generation and Properties
In this article, I explore the problems of ficta ‘generation’ and ‘properties’ in light of the philosophies of Alexius Meinong and Roman Ingarden. Comparing Ingarden and the historical Meinong is not a novel idea. By contrast, comparing Ingarden and a phenomenological Meinong has not, to my knowledg...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Helsinki University Press
2024-03-01
|
Series: | Estetika |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://account.estetikajournal.org/index.php/uh-j-eteja/article/view/376 |
_version_ | 1797202924168806400 |
---|---|
author | Hicham Jakha |
author_facet | Hicham Jakha |
author_sort | Hicham Jakha |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In this article, I explore the problems of ficta ‘generation’ and ‘properties’ in light of the philosophies of Alexius Meinong and Roman Ingarden. Comparing Ingarden and the historical Meinong is not a novel idea. By contrast, comparing Ingarden and a phenomenological Meinong has not, to my knowledge, yet been explored. Here, I rely on Alberto Voltolini’s ‘phenomenological conception of außerseiende entities’. I devise Ingarden’s phenomenological ontology to account for the problems of ascription and generation that cripple Meinong’s account. In short, I argue that Ingarden’s account is better suited to accommodate ficta’s generation and properties in a way that does not complicate our approach to fiction. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-24T08:11:10Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-f74dd50146894eba8c11f28e16ab6141 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2571-0915 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-24T08:11:10Z |
publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
publisher | Helsinki University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Estetika |
spelling | doaj.art-f74dd50146894eba8c11f28e16ab61412024-04-17T06:43:35ZengHelsinki University PressEstetika2571-09152024-03-0161154–7254–7210.33134/eeja.376111Ingarden vs. Meinong on Ficta’s Generation and PropertiesHicham Jakha0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3126-4100John Paul II Catholic University of LubinIn this article, I explore the problems of ficta ‘generation’ and ‘properties’ in light of the philosophies of Alexius Meinong and Roman Ingarden. Comparing Ingarden and the historical Meinong is not a novel idea. By contrast, comparing Ingarden and a phenomenological Meinong has not, to my knowledge, yet been explored. Here, I rely on Alberto Voltolini’s ‘phenomenological conception of außerseiende entities’. I devise Ingarden’s phenomenological ontology to account for the problems of ascription and generation that cripple Meinong’s account. In short, I argue that Ingarden’s account is better suited to accommodate ficta’s generation and properties in a way that does not complicate our approach to fiction.https://account.estetikajournal.org/index.php/uh-j-eteja/article/view/376roman ingardenalexius meinongfictional objectspropertiesphenomenologyontology |
spellingShingle | Hicham Jakha Ingarden vs. Meinong on Ficta’s Generation and Properties Estetika roman ingarden alexius meinong fictional objects properties phenomenology ontology |
title | Ingarden vs. Meinong on Ficta’s Generation and Properties |
title_full | Ingarden vs. Meinong on Ficta’s Generation and Properties |
title_fullStr | Ingarden vs. Meinong on Ficta’s Generation and Properties |
title_full_unstemmed | Ingarden vs. Meinong on Ficta’s Generation and Properties |
title_short | Ingarden vs. Meinong on Ficta’s Generation and Properties |
title_sort | ingarden vs meinong on ficta s generation and properties |
topic | roman ingarden alexius meinong fictional objects properties phenomenology ontology |
url | https://account.estetikajournal.org/index.php/uh-j-eteja/article/view/376 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hichamjakha ingardenvsmeinongonfictasgenerationandproperties |