Ingarden vs. Meinong on Ficta’s Generation and Properties

In this article, I explore the problems of ficta ‘generation’ and ‘properties’ in light of the philosophies of Alexius Meinong and Roman Ingarden. Comparing Ingarden and the historical Meinong is not a novel idea. By contrast, comparing Ingarden and a phenomenological Meinong has not, to my knowledg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hicham Jakha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Helsinki University Press 2024-03-01
Series:Estetika
Subjects:
Online Access:https://account.estetikajournal.org/index.php/uh-j-eteja/article/view/376
_version_ 1797202924168806400
author Hicham Jakha
author_facet Hicham Jakha
author_sort Hicham Jakha
collection DOAJ
description In this article, I explore the problems of ficta ‘generation’ and ‘properties’ in light of the philosophies of Alexius Meinong and Roman Ingarden. Comparing Ingarden and the historical Meinong is not a novel idea. By contrast, comparing Ingarden and a phenomenological Meinong has not, to my knowledge, yet been explored. Here, I rely on Alberto Voltolini’s ‘phenomenological conception of außerseiende entities’. I devise Ingarden’s phenomenological ontology to account for the problems of ascription and generation that cripple Meinong’s account. In short, I argue that Ingarden’s account is better suited to accommodate ficta’s generation and properties in a way that does not complicate our approach to fiction.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T08:11:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f74dd50146894eba8c11f28e16ab6141
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2571-0915
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T08:11:10Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Helsinki University Press
record_format Article
series Estetika
spelling doaj.art-f74dd50146894eba8c11f28e16ab61412024-04-17T06:43:35ZengHelsinki University PressEstetika2571-09152024-03-0161154–7254–7210.33134/eeja.376111Ingarden vs. Meinong on Ficta’s Generation and PropertiesHicham Jakha0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3126-4100John Paul II Catholic University of LubinIn this article, I explore the problems of ficta ‘generation’ and ‘properties’ in light of the philosophies of Alexius Meinong and Roman Ingarden. Comparing Ingarden and the historical Meinong is not a novel idea. By contrast, comparing Ingarden and a phenomenological Meinong has not, to my knowledge, yet been explored. Here, I rely on Alberto Voltolini’s ‘phenomenological conception of außerseiende entities’. I devise Ingarden’s phenomenological ontology to account for the problems of ascription and generation that cripple Meinong’s account. In short, I argue that Ingarden’s account is better suited to accommodate ficta’s generation and properties in a way that does not complicate our approach to fiction.https://account.estetikajournal.org/index.php/uh-j-eteja/article/view/376roman ingardenalexius meinongfictional objectspropertiesphenomenologyontology
spellingShingle Hicham Jakha
Ingarden vs. Meinong on Ficta’s Generation and Properties
Estetika
roman ingarden
alexius meinong
fictional objects
properties
phenomenology
ontology
title Ingarden vs. Meinong on Ficta’s Generation and Properties
title_full Ingarden vs. Meinong on Ficta’s Generation and Properties
title_fullStr Ingarden vs. Meinong on Ficta’s Generation and Properties
title_full_unstemmed Ingarden vs. Meinong on Ficta’s Generation and Properties
title_short Ingarden vs. Meinong on Ficta’s Generation and Properties
title_sort ingarden vs meinong on ficta s generation and properties
topic roman ingarden
alexius meinong
fictional objects
properties
phenomenology
ontology
url https://account.estetikajournal.org/index.php/uh-j-eteja/article/view/376
work_keys_str_mv AT hichamjakha ingardenvsmeinongonfictasgenerationandproperties