Hat Kurt Gödel Thomas von Aquins Kommentar zu Aristoteles’ De anima rezipiert?
The search for an answer to the question that constitutes the title has led to some insightful results concerning Kurt Gödel’s critical reception of major philosophical works. It shows how he uses philosophical argumentations of classical authors and turns them into new aspects for his own philosoph...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Éditions Kimé
2013-03-01
|
| Series: | Philosophia Scientiæ |
| Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/834 |
| _version_ | 1797402573252067328 |
|---|---|
| author | Eva-Maria Engelen |
| author_facet | Eva-Maria Engelen |
| author_sort | Eva-Maria Engelen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The search for an answer to the question that constitutes the title has led to some insightful results concerning Kurt Gödel’s critical reception of major philosophical works. It shows how he uses philosophical argumentations of classical authors and turns them into new aspects for his own philosophical argumentation. In the case at hand a classical argument by Aristotle for the immaterialness of the soul is used by Gödel in order to add considerations to his own reasoning for the inexhaustibility of mathematics, the mind-body-problem and his considerations about God; and vice versa to give new insights into an argument with a long history of reception. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T02:26:14Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f758dd3234954bccb3325d3c1dfc55f7 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1281-2463 1775-4283 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T02:26:14Z |
| publishDate | 2013-03-01 |
| publisher | Éditions Kimé |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Philosophia Scientiæ |
| spelling | doaj.art-f758dd3234954bccb3325d3c1dfc55f72023-12-06T15:54:35ZdeuÉditions KiméPhilosophia Scientiæ1281-24631775-42832013-03-0117116718810.4000/philosophiascientiae.834Hat Kurt Gödel Thomas von Aquins Kommentar zu Aristoteles’ De anima rezipiert?Eva-Maria EngelenThe search for an answer to the question that constitutes the title has led to some insightful results concerning Kurt Gödel’s critical reception of major philosophical works. It shows how he uses philosophical argumentations of classical authors and turns them into new aspects for his own philosophical argumentation. In the case at hand a classical argument by Aristotle for the immaterialness of the soul is used by Gödel in order to add considerations to his own reasoning for the inexhaustibility of mathematics, the mind-body-problem and his considerations about God; and vice versa to give new insights into an argument with a long history of reception.http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/834 |
| spellingShingle | Eva-Maria Engelen Hat Kurt Gödel Thomas von Aquins Kommentar zu Aristoteles’ De anima rezipiert? Philosophia Scientiæ |
| title | Hat Kurt Gödel Thomas von Aquins Kommentar zu Aristoteles’ De anima rezipiert? |
| title_full | Hat Kurt Gödel Thomas von Aquins Kommentar zu Aristoteles’ De anima rezipiert? |
| title_fullStr | Hat Kurt Gödel Thomas von Aquins Kommentar zu Aristoteles’ De anima rezipiert? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Hat Kurt Gödel Thomas von Aquins Kommentar zu Aristoteles’ De anima rezipiert? |
| title_short | Hat Kurt Gödel Thomas von Aquins Kommentar zu Aristoteles’ De anima rezipiert? |
| title_sort | hat kurt godel thomas von aquins kommentar zu aristoteles de anima rezipiert |
| url | http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/834 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT evamariaengelen hatkurtgodelthomasvonaquinskommentarzuaristotelesdeanimarezipiert |