The exploration of three different treatment models of osimertinib plus antiangiogenic agents in non‐small cell lung cancer: A real‐world study

Abstract Background Real‐world application of osimertinib with antiangiogenic agents in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is common, but the efficacy data are rarely reported. Methods To obtain an objective efficacy report of different real‐world treatment models of osimertinib and antiangiogenic a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu Feng, Liling Huang, Haohua Zhu, Le Tang, Xingsheng Hu, Yuankai Shi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-09-01
Series:Thoracic Cancer
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14603
_version_ 1798033005662437376
author Yu Feng
Liling Huang
Haohua Zhu
Le Tang
Xingsheng Hu
Yuankai Shi
author_facet Yu Feng
Liling Huang
Haohua Zhu
Le Tang
Xingsheng Hu
Yuankai Shi
author_sort Yu Feng
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Real‐world application of osimertinib with antiangiogenic agents in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is common, but the efficacy data are rarely reported. Methods To obtain an objective efficacy report of different real‐world treatment models of osimertinib and antiangiogenic agents. Results A total of 54 patients with NSCLC were enrolled into the study. Twelve (22.2%) who received a combination of antiangiogenic agents, when there was a trend of osimertinib resistance but did not reach imageology progressive disease (PD), were assigned to Group A, with a median overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) of 48.0 (95% CI, not reached) and 21.0 (95% CI: 16.7–25.3) months, respectively. Thirty (55.6%) who received a combination of antiangiogenic agents when there was imageology PD during treatment with osimertinib were assigned to Group B, with a median OS and PFS of 31.8 (95% CI: 26.6–37.1) and 9.2 (95% CI: 5.9–12.6) months, respectively. Twelve (22.2%) who received a combination of antiangiogenic agents at the initial treatment with osimertinib were assigned to Group C, with a median OS and PFS of 28.5 (95% CI: 15.2–41.8) and 15.3 (95% CI: 7.9–22.7) months, respectively. Patients in Group A achieved a significant prolonged median PFS (p < 0.001) compared with Groups B and C. Absence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutations (p = 0.043; hazard ratio [HR] = 2.124, 95% CI: 1.023–4.413) and no previous antiangiogenic agent application (p = 0.012; HR = 0.362, 95% CI: 0.163–0.863) were the independent prognostic factors of OS. Conclusion The well‐timed action to combine antiangiogenic agents was when there was a trend of osimertinib resistance. The absence of EGFR T790M mutations and previous use of antiangiogenic agents were poor prognostic factors.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T20:23:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f759123424b5420296231fcd9fc8edd7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1759-7706
1759-7714
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T20:23:16Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Thoracic Cancer
spelling doaj.art-f759123424b5420296231fcd9fc8edd72022-12-22T04:04:46ZengWileyThoracic Cancer1759-77061759-77142022-09-0113182641264910.1111/1759-7714.14603The exploration of three different treatment models of osimertinib plus antiangiogenic agents in non‐small cell lung cancer: A real‐world studyYu Feng0Liling Huang1Haohua Zhu2Le Tang3Xingsheng Hu4Yuankai Shi5Department of Medical Oncology National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs Beijing ChinaDepartment of Medical Oncology National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs Beijing ChinaDepartment of Medical Oncology National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs Beijing ChinaDepartment of Medical Oncology National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs Beijing ChinaDepartment of Medical Oncology National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs Beijing ChinaDepartment of Medical Oncology National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs Beijing ChinaAbstract Background Real‐world application of osimertinib with antiangiogenic agents in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is common, but the efficacy data are rarely reported. Methods To obtain an objective efficacy report of different real‐world treatment models of osimertinib and antiangiogenic agents. Results A total of 54 patients with NSCLC were enrolled into the study. Twelve (22.2%) who received a combination of antiangiogenic agents, when there was a trend of osimertinib resistance but did not reach imageology progressive disease (PD), were assigned to Group A, with a median overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) of 48.0 (95% CI, not reached) and 21.0 (95% CI: 16.7–25.3) months, respectively. Thirty (55.6%) who received a combination of antiangiogenic agents when there was imageology PD during treatment with osimertinib were assigned to Group B, with a median OS and PFS of 31.8 (95% CI: 26.6–37.1) and 9.2 (95% CI: 5.9–12.6) months, respectively. Twelve (22.2%) who received a combination of antiangiogenic agents at the initial treatment with osimertinib were assigned to Group C, with a median OS and PFS of 28.5 (95% CI: 15.2–41.8) and 15.3 (95% CI: 7.9–22.7) months, respectively. Patients in Group A achieved a significant prolonged median PFS (p < 0.001) compared with Groups B and C. Absence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutations (p = 0.043; hazard ratio [HR] = 2.124, 95% CI: 1.023–4.413) and no previous antiangiogenic agent application (p = 0.012; HR = 0.362, 95% CI: 0.163–0.863) were the independent prognostic factors of OS. Conclusion The well‐timed action to combine antiangiogenic agents was when there was a trend of osimertinib resistance. The absence of EGFR T790M mutations and previous use of antiangiogenic agents were poor prognostic factors.https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14603antiangiogenic agentsnon‐small cell lung cancerosimertinibresistance
spellingShingle Yu Feng
Liling Huang
Haohua Zhu
Le Tang
Xingsheng Hu
Yuankai Shi
The exploration of three different treatment models of osimertinib plus antiangiogenic agents in non‐small cell lung cancer: A real‐world study
Thoracic Cancer
antiangiogenic agents
non‐small cell lung cancer
osimertinib
resistance
title The exploration of three different treatment models of osimertinib plus antiangiogenic agents in non‐small cell lung cancer: A real‐world study
title_full The exploration of three different treatment models of osimertinib plus antiangiogenic agents in non‐small cell lung cancer: A real‐world study
title_fullStr The exploration of three different treatment models of osimertinib plus antiangiogenic agents in non‐small cell lung cancer: A real‐world study
title_full_unstemmed The exploration of three different treatment models of osimertinib plus antiangiogenic agents in non‐small cell lung cancer: A real‐world study
title_short The exploration of three different treatment models of osimertinib plus antiangiogenic agents in non‐small cell lung cancer: A real‐world study
title_sort exploration of three different treatment models of osimertinib plus antiangiogenic agents in non small cell lung cancer a real world study
topic antiangiogenic agents
non‐small cell lung cancer
osimertinib
resistance
url https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14603
work_keys_str_mv AT yufeng theexplorationofthreedifferenttreatmentmodelsofosimertinibplusantiangiogenicagentsinnonsmallcelllungcancerarealworldstudy
AT lilinghuang theexplorationofthreedifferenttreatmentmodelsofosimertinibplusantiangiogenicagentsinnonsmallcelllungcancerarealworldstudy
AT haohuazhu theexplorationofthreedifferenttreatmentmodelsofosimertinibplusantiangiogenicagentsinnonsmallcelllungcancerarealworldstudy
AT letang theexplorationofthreedifferenttreatmentmodelsofosimertinibplusantiangiogenicagentsinnonsmallcelllungcancerarealworldstudy
AT xingshenghu theexplorationofthreedifferenttreatmentmodelsofosimertinibplusantiangiogenicagentsinnonsmallcelllungcancerarealworldstudy
AT yuankaishi theexplorationofthreedifferenttreatmentmodelsofosimertinibplusantiangiogenicagentsinnonsmallcelllungcancerarealworldstudy
AT yufeng explorationofthreedifferenttreatmentmodelsofosimertinibplusantiangiogenicagentsinnonsmallcelllungcancerarealworldstudy
AT lilinghuang explorationofthreedifferenttreatmentmodelsofosimertinibplusantiangiogenicagentsinnonsmallcelllungcancerarealworldstudy
AT haohuazhu explorationofthreedifferenttreatmentmodelsofosimertinibplusantiangiogenicagentsinnonsmallcelllungcancerarealworldstudy
AT letang explorationofthreedifferenttreatmentmodelsofosimertinibplusantiangiogenicagentsinnonsmallcelllungcancerarealworldstudy
AT xingshenghu explorationofthreedifferenttreatmentmodelsofosimertinibplusantiangiogenicagentsinnonsmallcelllungcancerarealworldstudy
AT yuankaishi explorationofthreedifferenttreatmentmodelsofosimertinibplusantiangiogenicagentsinnonsmallcelllungcancerarealworldstudy