A comparative assessment of open flame flares and enclosed ground flares for cleaner and safer hydrocarbon production in Mexico
Hydrocarbon industry flaring practices emit large amounts of unburned hydrocarbons and climate forcers, creating environmental and social impacts. The objective of this study is to thoroughly compare different flaring technologies in situations where the industry is unable to avoid flaring. An integ...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2023-10-01
|
| Series: | Cleaner Engineering and Technology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790823000769 |
| _version_ | 1797653657934626816 |
|---|---|
| author | Abel Clemente-Reyes Cecilia Martin-Del-Campo Pamela F. Nelson Alfonso Duran-Moreno |
| author_facet | Abel Clemente-Reyes Cecilia Martin-Del-Campo Pamela F. Nelson Alfonso Duran-Moreno |
| author_sort | Abel Clemente-Reyes |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Hydrocarbon industry flaring practices emit large amounts of unburned hydrocarbons and climate forcers, creating environmental and social impacts. The objective of this study is to thoroughly compare different flaring technologies in situations where the industry is unable to avoid flaring. An integrated methodology for assessing two flare technologies in terms of Health-Environment-Safety (HES) impacts, economic performance, and safety benefits is proposed. The methodology includes stoichiometric calculations of combustion reactions, pollutants emission estimation, flare dimensioning for an equivalent inflow stream to be flared, and economic scenarios for assessing Enclosed Ground Flares (EGFs) versus Open Flame Flares (OFFs). The methodology was applied to a Mexican hydrocarbon installation that currently operates OFFs with a historical record of low combustion efficiency. If an EGF were to replace the existing OFF, there would be a significant emissions abatement that depends on their realistic operating efficiencies. Furthermore, the EGF has the potential to utilize 1.55thermal GW for energy applications, which is currently being wasted as the OFF releases it into the environment by flaring 3.75 Mm3/d. The safety radius required for the OFF is 9.3 times that required for the EGF of equivalent capacity. Over a 30-year period for the case study, the cumulative investment and O&M costs for EGF are about 23% less than for OFF. The consequence analysis with the PHAST software found that various failure conditions can be contained within the EGF combustion chamber without causing significant damage to the facility. However, the impacts of disturbances in the OFF such as gas clouds, flash fires, and explosions are around the torch. All these findings indicate that replacing OFF with EGF would be a safer and more economical solution in the future, as it also helps reduce pollutant emissions. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T16:47:47Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f75f71e3cf0e4d9581f9464ac291aa7c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2666-7908 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T16:47:47Z |
| publishDate | 2023-10-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Cleaner Engineering and Technology |
| spelling | doaj.art-f75f71e3cf0e4d9581f9464ac291aa7c2023-10-22T04:49:58ZengElsevierCleaner Engineering and Technology2666-79082023-10-0116100671A comparative assessment of open flame flares and enclosed ground flares for cleaner and safer hydrocarbon production in MexicoAbel Clemente-Reyes0Cecilia Martin-Del-Campo1Pamela F. Nelson2Alfonso Duran-Moreno3Energy Planning Unit, Faculty of Engineering. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, MexicoEnergy Planning Unit, Faculty of Engineering. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico; Corresponding author.Energy Planning Unit, Faculty of Engineering. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, MexicoFaculty of Chemistry. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, MexicoHydrocarbon industry flaring practices emit large amounts of unburned hydrocarbons and climate forcers, creating environmental and social impacts. The objective of this study is to thoroughly compare different flaring technologies in situations where the industry is unable to avoid flaring. An integrated methodology for assessing two flare technologies in terms of Health-Environment-Safety (HES) impacts, economic performance, and safety benefits is proposed. The methodology includes stoichiometric calculations of combustion reactions, pollutants emission estimation, flare dimensioning for an equivalent inflow stream to be flared, and economic scenarios for assessing Enclosed Ground Flares (EGFs) versus Open Flame Flares (OFFs). The methodology was applied to a Mexican hydrocarbon installation that currently operates OFFs with a historical record of low combustion efficiency. If an EGF were to replace the existing OFF, there would be a significant emissions abatement that depends on their realistic operating efficiencies. Furthermore, the EGF has the potential to utilize 1.55thermal GW for energy applications, which is currently being wasted as the OFF releases it into the environment by flaring 3.75 Mm3/d. The safety radius required for the OFF is 9.3 times that required for the EGF of equivalent capacity. Over a 30-year period for the case study, the cumulative investment and O&M costs for EGF are about 23% less than for OFF. The consequence analysis with the PHAST software found that various failure conditions can be contained within the EGF combustion chamber without causing significant damage to the facility. However, the impacts of disturbances in the OFF such as gas clouds, flash fires, and explosions are around the torch. All these findings indicate that replacing OFF with EGF would be a safer and more economical solution in the future, as it also helps reduce pollutant emissions.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790823000769Enclosed flares techno-economic assessmentFlare combustion efficiencyFlaring safety areaGas flare safetyHydrocarbon flaring emissions |
| spellingShingle | Abel Clemente-Reyes Cecilia Martin-Del-Campo Pamela F. Nelson Alfonso Duran-Moreno A comparative assessment of open flame flares and enclosed ground flares for cleaner and safer hydrocarbon production in Mexico Cleaner Engineering and Technology Enclosed flares techno-economic assessment Flare combustion efficiency Flaring safety area Gas flare safety Hydrocarbon flaring emissions |
| title | A comparative assessment of open flame flares and enclosed ground flares for cleaner and safer hydrocarbon production in Mexico |
| title_full | A comparative assessment of open flame flares and enclosed ground flares for cleaner and safer hydrocarbon production in Mexico |
| title_fullStr | A comparative assessment of open flame flares and enclosed ground flares for cleaner and safer hydrocarbon production in Mexico |
| title_full_unstemmed | A comparative assessment of open flame flares and enclosed ground flares for cleaner and safer hydrocarbon production in Mexico |
| title_short | A comparative assessment of open flame flares and enclosed ground flares for cleaner and safer hydrocarbon production in Mexico |
| title_sort | comparative assessment of open flame flares and enclosed ground flares for cleaner and safer hydrocarbon production in mexico |
| topic | Enclosed flares techno-economic assessment Flare combustion efficiency Flaring safety area Gas flare safety Hydrocarbon flaring emissions |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666790823000769 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT abelclementereyes acomparativeassessmentofopenflameflaresandenclosedgroundflaresforcleanerandsaferhydrocarbonproductioninmexico AT ceciliamartindelcampo acomparativeassessmentofopenflameflaresandenclosedgroundflaresforcleanerandsaferhydrocarbonproductioninmexico AT pamelafnelson acomparativeassessmentofopenflameflaresandenclosedgroundflaresforcleanerandsaferhydrocarbonproductioninmexico AT alfonsoduranmoreno acomparativeassessmentofopenflameflaresandenclosedgroundflaresforcleanerandsaferhydrocarbonproductioninmexico AT abelclementereyes comparativeassessmentofopenflameflaresandenclosedgroundflaresforcleanerandsaferhydrocarbonproductioninmexico AT ceciliamartindelcampo comparativeassessmentofopenflameflaresandenclosedgroundflaresforcleanerandsaferhydrocarbonproductioninmexico AT pamelafnelson comparativeassessmentofopenflameflaresandenclosedgroundflaresforcleanerandsaferhydrocarbonproductioninmexico AT alfonsoduranmoreno comparativeassessmentofopenflameflaresandenclosedgroundflaresforcleanerandsaferhydrocarbonproductioninmexico |