Melt Season Arctic Sea Ice Type Separability Using Fully and Compact Polarimetric C- and L-Band Synthetic Aperture Radar

Sea ice mapping using Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) in the melt season poses challenges, due to wet snow and melt ponds complicating sea ice type separability. To address this, we analyzed fully polarimetric (FP) and simulated compact polarimetric (CP) C- (RADARSAT-2) and L- (ALOS-2 PALSAR-2) band...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aikaterini Tavri, Randall Scharien, Torsten Geldsetzer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2023-10-01
Series:Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2023.2271578
_version_ 1797366171113095168
author Aikaterini Tavri
Randall Scharien
Torsten Geldsetzer
author_facet Aikaterini Tavri
Randall Scharien
Torsten Geldsetzer
author_sort Aikaterini Tavri
collection DOAJ
description Sea ice mapping using Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) in the melt season poses challenges, due to wet snow and melt ponds complicating sea ice type separability. To address this, we analyzed fully polarimetric (FP) and simulated compact polarimetric (CP) C- (RADARSAT-2) and L- (ALOS-2 PALSAR-2) band SAR, in the 2018 melt season in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, for stage-wise separation of first year ice (FYI) and multiyear ice (MYI). SAR scenes at both near- (19.1–28.3°) and far- (35.8–42.1°) range incidence angles and coincident high-resolution optical scenes were used to assess the impact of surface melt ponds on separability within a landfast ice zone of diverse ice thickness. C-band provided better separability between FYI and MYI during pond onset, while L-band was superior during pond drainage due to MYI volumetric scattering. CP parameters matched FP performance across the melt season. HH and HV, commonly offered in ScanSAR mode for both frequencies, presented good separability during pond onset and drainage. Using both C-band and L-band SAR along with constraining incidence angle ranges, enhances sea ice type identification and separability. Our results can support ice type classification and seasonal stage detection for climate studies and enhance existing frameworks for ice motion vector retrievals.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T17:00:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f7719cca54994b3290b7b9173b5a4298
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1712-7971
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T17:00:29Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-f7719cca54994b3290b7b9173b5a42982024-01-04T15:59:07ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing1712-79712023-10-0149110.1080/07038992.2023.22715782271578Melt Season Arctic Sea Ice Type Separability Using Fully and Compact Polarimetric C- and L-Band Synthetic Aperture RadarAikaterini Tavri0Randall Scharien1Torsten Geldsetzer2Department of Geography, University of VictoriaDepartment of Geography, University of VictoriaDepartment of Geography, University of CalgarySea ice mapping using Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) in the melt season poses challenges, due to wet snow and melt ponds complicating sea ice type separability. To address this, we analyzed fully polarimetric (FP) and simulated compact polarimetric (CP) C- (RADARSAT-2) and L- (ALOS-2 PALSAR-2) band SAR, in the 2018 melt season in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, for stage-wise separation of first year ice (FYI) and multiyear ice (MYI). SAR scenes at both near- (19.1–28.3°) and far- (35.8–42.1°) range incidence angles and coincident high-resolution optical scenes were used to assess the impact of surface melt ponds on separability within a landfast ice zone of diverse ice thickness. C-band provided better separability between FYI and MYI during pond onset, while L-band was superior during pond drainage due to MYI volumetric scattering. CP parameters matched FP performance across the melt season. HH and HV, commonly offered in ScanSAR mode for both frequencies, presented good separability during pond onset and drainage. Using both C-band and L-band SAR along with constraining incidence angle ranges, enhances sea ice type identification and separability. Our results can support ice type classification and seasonal stage detection for climate studies and enhance existing frameworks for ice motion vector retrievals.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2023.2271578
spellingShingle Aikaterini Tavri
Randall Scharien
Torsten Geldsetzer
Melt Season Arctic Sea Ice Type Separability Using Fully and Compact Polarimetric C- and L-Band Synthetic Aperture Radar
Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing
title Melt Season Arctic Sea Ice Type Separability Using Fully and Compact Polarimetric C- and L-Band Synthetic Aperture Radar
title_full Melt Season Arctic Sea Ice Type Separability Using Fully and Compact Polarimetric C- and L-Band Synthetic Aperture Radar
title_fullStr Melt Season Arctic Sea Ice Type Separability Using Fully and Compact Polarimetric C- and L-Band Synthetic Aperture Radar
title_full_unstemmed Melt Season Arctic Sea Ice Type Separability Using Fully and Compact Polarimetric C- and L-Band Synthetic Aperture Radar
title_short Melt Season Arctic Sea Ice Type Separability Using Fully and Compact Polarimetric C- and L-Band Synthetic Aperture Radar
title_sort melt season arctic sea ice type separability using fully and compact polarimetric c and l band synthetic aperture radar
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2023.2271578
work_keys_str_mv AT aikaterinitavri meltseasonarcticseaicetypeseparabilityusingfullyandcompactpolarimetriccandlbandsyntheticapertureradar
AT randallscharien meltseasonarcticseaicetypeseparabilityusingfullyandcompactpolarimetriccandlbandsyntheticapertureradar
AT torstengeldsetzer meltseasonarcticseaicetypeseparabilityusingfullyandcompactpolarimetriccandlbandsyntheticapertureradar