Effectiveness of C1-INH therapy in angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor induced angioedema

Abstract Introduction Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEI) are a common cause of Emergency Room presentation for angioedema. Although no treatment guidelines exist, C1 esterase inhibitor concentrate (C1-INH) is used on an off label basis for management of ACEI acquired angioedema (ACEI AA...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Uliana Kovaltchouk, Boyang Zhang, Vipul Jain, Chrystyna Kalicinsky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-02-01
Series:Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-021-00521-w
_version_ 1818923503394488320
author Uliana Kovaltchouk
Boyang Zhang
Vipul Jain
Chrystyna Kalicinsky
author_facet Uliana Kovaltchouk
Boyang Zhang
Vipul Jain
Chrystyna Kalicinsky
author_sort Uliana Kovaltchouk
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEI) are a common cause of Emergency Room presentation for angioedema. Although no treatment guidelines exist, C1 esterase inhibitor concentrate (C1-INH) is used on an off label basis for management of ACEI acquired angioedema (ACEI AAE). Objective To evaluate the efficacy of C1-INH in management of ACEI AAE at our local centers. Results Nine patients, from 3 academic sites, were identified through Allergy Service consultation data and records from Diagnostic Services Manitoba, Canada from 2010–2020. The majority of the patients (n = 8/9) required endotracheal intubation prior to the initiation of C1-INH. Overall, approximately 56% of patients (n = 5/9) had resolution of angioedema ranging between 12 and 17 h, with a median time of 13.5 h, and no recurrence after the administration of C1-INH concentrate. One patient had transient symptom resolution in 14 h, however, recurrence of angioedema required re-intubation. The remainder of patients (n = 4/9), had resolution of angioedema between 22 and 72 h, with a median time of 33.75 h. Conclusion Our findings demonstrate continued ambivalence of the efficacy and role of C1-INH concentrate in the treatment of ACEI AAE, secondary to multiple uncontrolled confounding factors. Further research into characterizing a subgroup of intubated patients in our study that responded to C1-INH concentrate needs to be completed.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T02:10:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f7755c07441b4e3599b6f3704d797a16
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1710-1492
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T02:10:28Z
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
spelling doaj.art-f7755c07441b4e3599b6f3704d797a162022-12-21T19:57:05ZengBMCAllergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology1710-14922021-02-011711410.1186/s13223-021-00521-wEffectiveness of C1-INH therapy in angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor induced angioedemaUliana Kovaltchouk0Boyang Zhang1Vipul Jain2Chrystyna Kalicinsky3Internal medicine, University of ManitobaMax Rady College of Medicine, University of ManitobaClinal Immunology and Allergy, McMaster UniversityAllergy and Immunology, University of ManitobaAbstract Introduction Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEI) are a common cause of Emergency Room presentation for angioedema. Although no treatment guidelines exist, C1 esterase inhibitor concentrate (C1-INH) is used on an off label basis for management of ACEI acquired angioedema (ACEI AAE). Objective To evaluate the efficacy of C1-INH in management of ACEI AAE at our local centers. Results Nine patients, from 3 academic sites, were identified through Allergy Service consultation data and records from Diagnostic Services Manitoba, Canada from 2010–2020. The majority of the patients (n = 8/9) required endotracheal intubation prior to the initiation of C1-INH. Overall, approximately 56% of patients (n = 5/9) had resolution of angioedema ranging between 12 and 17 h, with a median time of 13.5 h, and no recurrence after the administration of C1-INH concentrate. One patient had transient symptom resolution in 14 h, however, recurrence of angioedema required re-intubation. The remainder of patients (n = 4/9), had resolution of angioedema between 22 and 72 h, with a median time of 33.75 h. Conclusion Our findings demonstrate continued ambivalence of the efficacy and role of C1-INH concentrate in the treatment of ACEI AAE, secondary to multiple uncontrolled confounding factors. Further research into characterizing a subgroup of intubated patients in our study that responded to C1-INH concentrate needs to be completed.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-021-00521-w
spellingShingle Uliana Kovaltchouk
Boyang Zhang
Vipul Jain
Chrystyna Kalicinsky
Effectiveness of C1-INH therapy in angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor induced angioedema
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
title Effectiveness of C1-INH therapy in angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor induced angioedema
title_full Effectiveness of C1-INH therapy in angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor induced angioedema
title_fullStr Effectiveness of C1-INH therapy in angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor induced angioedema
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of C1-INH therapy in angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor induced angioedema
title_short Effectiveness of C1-INH therapy in angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor induced angioedema
title_sort effectiveness of c1 inh therapy in angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor induced angioedema
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-021-00521-w
work_keys_str_mv AT ulianakovaltchouk effectivenessofc1inhtherapyinangiotensinconvertingenzymeinhibitorinducedangioedema
AT boyangzhang effectivenessofc1inhtherapyinangiotensinconvertingenzymeinhibitorinducedangioedema
AT vipuljain effectivenessofc1inhtherapyinangiotensinconvertingenzymeinhibitorinducedangioedema
AT chrystynakalicinsky effectivenessofc1inhtherapyinangiotensinconvertingenzymeinhibitorinducedangioedema