Global ocean dimethyl sulfide climatology estimated from observations and an artificial neural network

<p>Marine dimethyl sulfide (DMS) is important to climate due to the ability of DMS to alter Earth's radiation budget. Knowledge of the global-scale distribution, seasonal variability, and sea-to-air flux of DMS is needed in order to improve understanding of atmospheric sulfur, aerosol/clo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: W.-L. Wang, G. Song, F. Primeau, E. S. Saltzman, T. G. Bell, J. K. Moore
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-11-01
Series:Biogeosciences
Online Access:https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/5335/2020/bg-17-5335-2020.pdf
_version_ 1818342594819653632
author W.-L. Wang
G. Song
F. Primeau
E. S. Saltzman
E. S. Saltzman
T. G. Bell
T. G. Bell
J. K. Moore
author_facet W.-L. Wang
G. Song
F. Primeau
E. S. Saltzman
E. S. Saltzman
T. G. Bell
T. G. Bell
J. K. Moore
author_sort W.-L. Wang
collection DOAJ
description <p>Marine dimethyl sulfide (DMS) is important to climate due to the ability of DMS to alter Earth's radiation budget. Knowledge of the global-scale distribution, seasonal variability, and sea-to-air flux of DMS is needed in order to improve understanding of atmospheric sulfur, aerosol/cloud dynamics, and albedo. Here we examine the use of an artificial neural network (ANN) to extrapolate available DMS measurements to the global ocean and produce a global climatology with monthly temporal resolution. A global database of 82&thinsp;996 ship-based DMS measurements in surface waters was used along with a suite of environmental parameters consisting of latitude–longitude coordinates, time of day, time of year, solar radiation, mixed layer depth, sea surface temperature, salinity, nitrate, phosphate, and silicate. Linear regressions of DMS against the environmental parameters show that on a global-scale mixed layer depth and solar radiation are the strongest predictors of DMS. These parameters capture <span class="inline-formula">∼9</span>&thinsp;% and <span class="inline-formula">∼7</span>&thinsp;% of the raw DMS data variance, respectively. Multilinear regression can capture more of the raw data variance (<span class="inline-formula">∼39</span>&thinsp;%) but strongly underestimates DMS in high-concentration regions. In contrast, the artificial neural network captures <span class="inline-formula">∼66</span>&thinsp;% of the raw data variance in our database. Like prior climatologies our results show a strong seasonal cycle in surface ocean DMS with the highest concentrations and sea-to-air fluxes in the high-latitude summertime oceans. We estimate a lower global sea-to-air DMS flux (<span class="inline-formula">20.12±0.43</span>&thinsp;Tg&thinsp;S&thinsp;yr<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span>) than the prior estimate based on a map interpolation method when the same gas transfer velocity parameterization is used. Our sensitivity test results show that DMS concentration does not change unidirectionally with each of the environmental parameters, which emphasizes the interactions among these parameters. The ANN model suggests that the flux of DMS from the ocean to the atmosphere will increase with global warming. Given that larger DMS fluxes induce greater cloud albedo, this corresponds to a negative climate feedback.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-13T16:17:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f7807a1342d84f31867d994b2c36623b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1726-4170
1726-4189
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T16:17:11Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Biogeosciences
spelling doaj.art-f7807a1342d84f31867d994b2c36623b2022-12-21T23:38:49ZengCopernicus PublicationsBiogeosciences1726-41701726-41892020-11-01175335535410.5194/bg-17-5335-2020Global ocean dimethyl sulfide climatology estimated from observations and an artificial neural networkW.-L. Wang0G. Song1F. Primeau2E. S. Saltzman3E. S. Saltzman4T. G. Bell5T. G. Bell6J. K. Moore7Department of Earth System Science, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California, USASchool of Marine Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, ChinaDepartment of Earth System Science, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California, USADepartment of Earth System Science, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California, USADepartment of Chemistry, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California, USADepartment of Earth System Science, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California, USAPlymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, UKDepartment of Earth System Science, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, California, USA<p>Marine dimethyl sulfide (DMS) is important to climate due to the ability of DMS to alter Earth's radiation budget. Knowledge of the global-scale distribution, seasonal variability, and sea-to-air flux of DMS is needed in order to improve understanding of atmospheric sulfur, aerosol/cloud dynamics, and albedo. Here we examine the use of an artificial neural network (ANN) to extrapolate available DMS measurements to the global ocean and produce a global climatology with monthly temporal resolution. A global database of 82&thinsp;996 ship-based DMS measurements in surface waters was used along with a suite of environmental parameters consisting of latitude–longitude coordinates, time of day, time of year, solar radiation, mixed layer depth, sea surface temperature, salinity, nitrate, phosphate, and silicate. Linear regressions of DMS against the environmental parameters show that on a global-scale mixed layer depth and solar radiation are the strongest predictors of DMS. These parameters capture <span class="inline-formula">∼9</span>&thinsp;% and <span class="inline-formula">∼7</span>&thinsp;% of the raw DMS data variance, respectively. Multilinear regression can capture more of the raw data variance (<span class="inline-formula">∼39</span>&thinsp;%) but strongly underestimates DMS in high-concentration regions. In contrast, the artificial neural network captures <span class="inline-formula">∼66</span>&thinsp;% of the raw data variance in our database. Like prior climatologies our results show a strong seasonal cycle in surface ocean DMS with the highest concentrations and sea-to-air fluxes in the high-latitude summertime oceans. We estimate a lower global sea-to-air DMS flux (<span class="inline-formula">20.12±0.43</span>&thinsp;Tg&thinsp;S&thinsp;yr<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span>) than the prior estimate based on a map interpolation method when the same gas transfer velocity parameterization is used. Our sensitivity test results show that DMS concentration does not change unidirectionally with each of the environmental parameters, which emphasizes the interactions among these parameters. The ANN model suggests that the flux of DMS from the ocean to the atmosphere will increase with global warming. Given that larger DMS fluxes induce greater cloud albedo, this corresponds to a negative climate feedback.</p>https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/5335/2020/bg-17-5335-2020.pdf
spellingShingle W.-L. Wang
G. Song
F. Primeau
E. S. Saltzman
E. S. Saltzman
T. G. Bell
T. G. Bell
J. K. Moore
Global ocean dimethyl sulfide climatology estimated from observations and an artificial neural network
Biogeosciences
title Global ocean dimethyl sulfide climatology estimated from observations and an artificial neural network
title_full Global ocean dimethyl sulfide climatology estimated from observations and an artificial neural network
title_fullStr Global ocean dimethyl sulfide climatology estimated from observations and an artificial neural network
title_full_unstemmed Global ocean dimethyl sulfide climatology estimated from observations and an artificial neural network
title_short Global ocean dimethyl sulfide climatology estimated from observations and an artificial neural network
title_sort global ocean dimethyl sulfide climatology estimated from observations and an artificial neural network
url https://bg.copernicus.org/articles/17/5335/2020/bg-17-5335-2020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT wlwang globaloceandimethylsulfideclimatologyestimatedfromobservationsandanartificialneuralnetwork
AT gsong globaloceandimethylsulfideclimatologyestimatedfromobservationsandanartificialneuralnetwork
AT fprimeau globaloceandimethylsulfideclimatologyestimatedfromobservationsandanartificialneuralnetwork
AT essaltzman globaloceandimethylsulfideclimatologyestimatedfromobservationsandanartificialneuralnetwork
AT essaltzman globaloceandimethylsulfideclimatologyestimatedfromobservationsandanartificialneuralnetwork
AT tgbell globaloceandimethylsulfideclimatologyestimatedfromobservationsandanartificialneuralnetwork
AT tgbell globaloceandimethylsulfideclimatologyestimatedfromobservationsandanartificialneuralnetwork
AT jkmoore globaloceandimethylsulfideclimatologyestimatedfromobservationsandanartificialneuralnetwork