Prognostic impact of socioeconomic status among patients with malignant melanoma of the skin: a population-based study

Objective: To assess the prognostic impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on the outcome of cases with cutaneous melanoma. Methods: Novel SEER socioeconomic database has been accessed and patients with malignant melanoma of the skin (2000–2015) were reviewed. SES was evaluated through a specialized m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Omar Abdel-Rahman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-08-01
Series:Journal of Dermatological Treatment
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2019.1657223
_version_ 1797683648094273536
author Omar Abdel-Rahman
author_facet Omar Abdel-Rahman
author_sort Omar Abdel-Rahman
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To assess the prognostic impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on the outcome of cases with cutaneous melanoma. Methods: Novel SEER socioeconomic database has been accessed and patients with malignant melanoma of the skin (2000–2015) were reviewed. SES was evaluated through a specialized multi-dimension index and patients were classified into three groups (group 1/2/3) where group 1 has the lowest SES and group 3 has the highest SES. Kaplan–Meier survival estimates were used to evaluate the impact of SES on overall survival and multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to assess the impact of SES on melanoma-specific survival. Results: A total of 261,076 patients with malignant melanoma of the skin were included in the current study. Among which, 44,804 patients were within group 1 SES, 84,168 patients were within group 2 SES and 132,104 patients were within group 3 SES. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed, and it showed that patients with lower SES have worse overall survival (p < .001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis was subsequently performed, and it showed also that lower SES is associated with worse melanoma-specific survival (hazard ratio for group 1 versus group 3 SES: 1.361; 95% CI: 1.315–1.409; p < .001). Conclusion: Patients with cutaneous melanoma and lower SES have worse overall and melanoma-specific survival compared to patients with higher SES. This finding was consistent among different clinical subsets of patients according to stage, race/ethnicity, and year of diagnosis.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T00:18:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f796d94f2e0b4b018b48031e371c4822
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0954-6634
1471-1753
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T00:18:37Z
publishDate 2020-08-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Journal of Dermatological Treatment
spelling doaj.art-f796d94f2e0b4b018b48031e371c48222023-09-15T14:23:03ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Dermatological Treatment0954-66341471-17532020-08-0131657157510.1080/09546634.2019.16572231657223Prognostic impact of socioeconomic status among patients with malignant melanoma of the skin: a population-based studyOmar Abdel-Rahman0University of Alberta, Cross Cancer InstituteObjective: To assess the prognostic impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on the outcome of cases with cutaneous melanoma. Methods: Novel SEER socioeconomic database has been accessed and patients with malignant melanoma of the skin (2000–2015) were reviewed. SES was evaluated through a specialized multi-dimension index and patients were classified into three groups (group 1/2/3) where group 1 has the lowest SES and group 3 has the highest SES. Kaplan–Meier survival estimates were used to evaluate the impact of SES on overall survival and multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to assess the impact of SES on melanoma-specific survival. Results: A total of 261,076 patients with malignant melanoma of the skin were included in the current study. Among which, 44,804 patients were within group 1 SES, 84,168 patients were within group 2 SES and 132,104 patients were within group 3 SES. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed, and it showed that patients with lower SES have worse overall survival (p < .001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis was subsequently performed, and it showed also that lower SES is associated with worse melanoma-specific survival (hazard ratio for group 1 versus group 3 SES: 1.361; 95% CI: 1.315–1.409; p < .001). Conclusion: Patients with cutaneous melanoma and lower SES have worse overall and melanoma-specific survival compared to patients with higher SES. This finding was consistent among different clinical subsets of patients according to stage, race/ethnicity, and year of diagnosis.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2019.1657223malignant melanomaincomeeducationprognosis
spellingShingle Omar Abdel-Rahman
Prognostic impact of socioeconomic status among patients with malignant melanoma of the skin: a population-based study
Journal of Dermatological Treatment
malignant melanoma
income
education
prognosis
title Prognostic impact of socioeconomic status among patients with malignant melanoma of the skin: a population-based study
title_full Prognostic impact of socioeconomic status among patients with malignant melanoma of the skin: a population-based study
title_fullStr Prognostic impact of socioeconomic status among patients with malignant melanoma of the skin: a population-based study
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic impact of socioeconomic status among patients with malignant melanoma of the skin: a population-based study
title_short Prognostic impact of socioeconomic status among patients with malignant melanoma of the skin: a population-based study
title_sort prognostic impact of socioeconomic status among patients with malignant melanoma of the skin a population based study
topic malignant melanoma
income
education
prognosis
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2019.1657223
work_keys_str_mv AT omarabdelrahman prognosticimpactofsocioeconomicstatusamongpatientswithmalignantmelanomaoftheskinapopulationbasedstudy