2020 rankings for US PharmD programs, research, and overall quality

Background: US News and World Report (USNWR) publishes well-known rankings of graduate health programs. Medicine and nursing are ranked with weighted metrics using multiple criteria, and medical schools are ranked separately according to their focus (research or primary care). USNWR pharmacy school...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lisa Lebovitz, Kimberly K. Daugherty, Margarita V. DiVall, Eric G. Boyce, Michael Rudolph
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-09-01
Series:Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276622000683
_version_ 1798001514250240000
author Lisa Lebovitz
Kimberly K. Daugherty
Margarita V. DiVall
Eric G. Boyce
Michael Rudolph
author_facet Lisa Lebovitz
Kimberly K. Daugherty
Margarita V. DiVall
Eric G. Boyce
Michael Rudolph
author_sort Lisa Lebovitz
collection DOAJ
description Background: US News and World Report (USNWR) publishes well-known rankings of graduate health programs. Medicine and nursing are ranked with weighted metrics using multiple criteria, and medical schools are ranked separately according to their focus (research or primary care). USNWR pharmacy school rankings are based on a single-question peer perception survey. Objective: The objective of this study was to develop a simple, transparent framework to rank US colleges and schools of pharmacy in overall quality and separately based on program quality and research quality, using data that are readily available to the academy. Methods: Data for three education quality and four research quality metrics were obtained for 2020. Each metric was standardized and ranked, and then each set was summed to determine separate ranks for education and research. Education and research scores were combined using equal weights to provide a single rank for overall quality. A sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the effect of assigning higher proportionate value to education, similar to USNWR medical school rankings. Results: Distinct ranks were produced for education, research, overall (education: research) 50:50, and overall 60:40. Sensitivity analysis suggests the more disproportionately the education and research factors are weighted, the more ranks change. Mid-ranked schools were most impacted when weightings changed due to relative strength in one factor and relative weakness in the other. When weighted 60:40, nine (7%) mid-ranked programs improved in rank, while 11 (11%) worsened in rank compared to the 50:50 model. Conclusion: Separately ranking education and research can highlight the diverse strengths of pharmacy schools. The proposed model is based on easily obtainable data and is easily reproducible, allowing for annual rankings. These rankings may be used by PharmD and PhD applicants when selecting schools and by pharmacy schools to benchmark true and aspirational peers.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T11:37:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f7a848bc6f2c4c21bdcbba058a83ae82
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2667-2766
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T11:37:26Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy
spelling doaj.art-f7a848bc6f2c4c21bdcbba058a83ae822022-12-22T04:25:55ZengElsevierExploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy2667-27662022-09-0171001692020 rankings for US PharmD programs, research, and overall qualityLisa Lebovitz0Kimberly K. Daugherty1Margarita V. DiVall2Eric G. Boyce3Michael Rudolph4University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, 20 North Pine Street, PH S303, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States of America; Corresponding author at: University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, 20 North Pine Street, PH S303, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States of America.Sullivan University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 2100 Gardiner Lane, Louisville, KY 40205, United States of AmericaNortheastern University School of Pharmacy, 120 Behrakis Life Sciences, Boston, MA 02115, United States of AmericaThomas J. Long School of Pharmacy, University of the Pacific, 3601 Pacific Avenue, Stockton, CA 95211, United States of AmericaLincoln Memorial University School of Medical Sciences, 6965 Cumberland Gap Parkway, Harrogate, TN 37752, United States of AmericaBackground: US News and World Report (USNWR) publishes well-known rankings of graduate health programs. Medicine and nursing are ranked with weighted metrics using multiple criteria, and medical schools are ranked separately according to their focus (research or primary care). USNWR pharmacy school rankings are based on a single-question peer perception survey. Objective: The objective of this study was to develop a simple, transparent framework to rank US colleges and schools of pharmacy in overall quality and separately based on program quality and research quality, using data that are readily available to the academy. Methods: Data for three education quality and four research quality metrics were obtained for 2020. Each metric was standardized and ranked, and then each set was summed to determine separate ranks for education and research. Education and research scores were combined using equal weights to provide a single rank for overall quality. A sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the effect of assigning higher proportionate value to education, similar to USNWR medical school rankings. Results: Distinct ranks were produced for education, research, overall (education: research) 50:50, and overall 60:40. Sensitivity analysis suggests the more disproportionately the education and research factors are weighted, the more ranks change. Mid-ranked schools were most impacted when weightings changed due to relative strength in one factor and relative weakness in the other. When weighted 60:40, nine (7%) mid-ranked programs improved in rank, while 11 (11%) worsened in rank compared to the 50:50 model. Conclusion: Separately ranking education and research can highlight the diverse strengths of pharmacy schools. The proposed model is based on easily obtainable data and is easily reproducible, allowing for annual rankings. These rankings may be used by PharmD and PhD applicants when selecting schools and by pharmacy schools to benchmark true and aspirational peers.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276622000683RankingsProgramQuality
spellingShingle Lisa Lebovitz
Kimberly K. Daugherty
Margarita V. DiVall
Eric G. Boyce
Michael Rudolph
2020 rankings for US PharmD programs, research, and overall quality
Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy
Rankings
Program
Quality
title 2020 rankings for US PharmD programs, research, and overall quality
title_full 2020 rankings for US PharmD programs, research, and overall quality
title_fullStr 2020 rankings for US PharmD programs, research, and overall quality
title_full_unstemmed 2020 rankings for US PharmD programs, research, and overall quality
title_short 2020 rankings for US PharmD programs, research, and overall quality
title_sort 2020 rankings for us pharmd programs research and overall quality
topic Rankings
Program
Quality
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276622000683
work_keys_str_mv AT lisalebovitz 2020rankingsforuspharmdprogramsresearchandoverallquality
AT kimberlykdaugherty 2020rankingsforuspharmdprogramsresearchandoverallquality
AT margaritavdivall 2020rankingsforuspharmdprogramsresearchandoverallquality
AT ericgboyce 2020rankingsforuspharmdprogramsresearchandoverallquality
AT michaelrudolph 2020rankingsforuspharmdprogramsresearchandoverallquality