δ13C as a tool for iron and phosphorus deficiency prediction in crops

Abstract Many studies proposed the use of stable carbon isotope ratio (δ13C) as a predictor of abiotic stresses in plants, considering only drought and nitrogen deficiency without further investigating the impact of other nutrient deficiencies, that is, phosphorus (P) and/or iron (Fe) deficiencies....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fabio Trevisan, Raphael Tiziani, Robert D. Hall, Stefano Cesco, Tanja Mimmo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-03-01
Series:Plant Direct
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/pld3.487
_version_ 1797857458295668736
author Fabio Trevisan
Raphael Tiziani
Robert D. Hall
Stefano Cesco
Tanja Mimmo
author_facet Fabio Trevisan
Raphael Tiziani
Robert D. Hall
Stefano Cesco
Tanja Mimmo
author_sort Fabio Trevisan
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Many studies proposed the use of stable carbon isotope ratio (δ13C) as a predictor of abiotic stresses in plants, considering only drought and nitrogen deficiency without further investigating the impact of other nutrient deficiencies, that is, phosphorus (P) and/or iron (Fe) deficiencies. To fill this knowledge gap, we assessed the δ13C of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.), maize (Zea mays L.), and tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.) plants suffering from P, Fe, and combined P/Fe deficiencies during a two‐week period using an isotope‐ratio mass spectrometer. Simultaneously, plant physiological status was monitored with an infra‐red gas analyzer. Results show clear contrasting time‐, treatment‐, species‐, and tissue‐specific variations. Furthermore, physiological parameters showed limited correlation with δ13C shifts, highlighting that the plants' δ13C, does not depend solely on photosynthetic carbon isotope fractionation/discrimination (Δ). Hence, the use of δ13C as a predictor is highly discouraged due to its inability to detect and discern different nutrient stresses, especially when combined stresses are present.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T20:57:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f7a87c651dd448999ed0680c690e5bfa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2475-4455
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T20:57:01Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Plant Direct
spelling doaj.art-f7a87c651dd448999ed0680c690e5bfa2023-03-29T15:36:31ZengWileyPlant Direct2475-44552023-03-0173n/an/a10.1002/pld3.487δ13C as a tool for iron and phosphorus deficiency prediction in cropsFabio Trevisan0Raphael Tiziani1Robert D. Hall2Stefano Cesco3Tanja Mimmo4Faculty of Science and Technology Free University of Bolzano Bolzano ItalyFaculty of Science and Technology Free University of Bolzano Bolzano ItalyLaboratory of Plant Physiology Wageningen University & Research Wageningen The NetherlandsFaculty of Science and Technology Free University of Bolzano Bolzano ItalyFaculty of Science and Technology Free University of Bolzano Bolzano ItalyAbstract Many studies proposed the use of stable carbon isotope ratio (δ13C) as a predictor of abiotic stresses in plants, considering only drought and nitrogen deficiency without further investigating the impact of other nutrient deficiencies, that is, phosphorus (P) and/or iron (Fe) deficiencies. To fill this knowledge gap, we assessed the δ13C of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.), maize (Zea mays L.), and tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.) plants suffering from P, Fe, and combined P/Fe deficiencies during a two‐week period using an isotope‐ratio mass spectrometer. Simultaneously, plant physiological status was monitored with an infra‐red gas analyzer. Results show clear contrasting time‐, treatment‐, species‐, and tissue‐specific variations. Furthermore, physiological parameters showed limited correlation with δ13C shifts, highlighting that the plants' δ13C, does not depend solely on photosynthetic carbon isotope fractionation/discrimination (Δ). Hence, the use of δ13C as a predictor is highly discouraged due to its inability to detect and discern different nutrient stresses, especially when combined stresses are present.https://doi.org/10.1002/pld3.487barleyC4 and C3 plantscarbon isotope ratiocucumberfractionationmaize
spellingShingle Fabio Trevisan
Raphael Tiziani
Robert D. Hall
Stefano Cesco
Tanja Mimmo
δ13C as a tool for iron and phosphorus deficiency prediction in crops
Plant Direct
barley
C4 and C3 plants
carbon isotope ratio
cucumber
fractionation
maize
title δ13C as a tool for iron and phosphorus deficiency prediction in crops
title_full δ13C as a tool for iron and phosphorus deficiency prediction in crops
title_fullStr δ13C as a tool for iron and phosphorus deficiency prediction in crops
title_full_unstemmed δ13C as a tool for iron and phosphorus deficiency prediction in crops
title_short δ13C as a tool for iron and phosphorus deficiency prediction in crops
title_sort δ13c as a tool for iron and phosphorus deficiency prediction in crops
topic barley
C4 and C3 plants
carbon isotope ratio
cucumber
fractionation
maize
url https://doi.org/10.1002/pld3.487
work_keys_str_mv AT fabiotrevisan d13casatoolforironandphosphorusdeficiencypredictionincrops
AT raphaeltiziani d13casatoolforironandphosphorusdeficiencypredictionincrops
AT robertdhall d13casatoolforironandphosphorusdeficiencypredictionincrops
AT stefanocesco d13casatoolforironandphosphorusdeficiencypredictionincrops
AT tanjamimmo d13casatoolforironandphosphorusdeficiencypredictionincrops