A Structural Design Comparison Between Two Reinforced Concrete Regular 6-Level Buildings using Soil-Structure Interaction in Linear Range
Structural engineers commonly design superstructures as fixed at the base and transmit the reactions to the infrastructure in order to design the foundation system and estimate the displacement of the soil while disregarding the change in seismic response that this induces. In this article, the foun...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
2021-07-01
|
| Series: | Ingeniería e Investigación |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv/article/view/86819 |
| _version_ | 1819126165730754560 |
|---|---|
| author | Nelson Andrés López Machado Gabriela Perez Christian Castro Juan Carlos Vielma Perez Leonardo José López Machado José Domingo Alviar Malabet Carlos Alberto Romero Romero David Patricio Guerrero Cuasapaz Vanessa Viviana Montesinos Machado |
| author_facet | Nelson Andrés López Machado Gabriela Perez Christian Castro Juan Carlos Vielma Perez Leonardo José López Machado José Domingo Alviar Malabet Carlos Alberto Romero Romero David Patricio Guerrero Cuasapaz Vanessa Viviana Montesinos Machado |
| author_sort | Nelson Andrés López Machado |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Structural engineers commonly design superstructures as fixed at the base and transmit the reactions to the infrastructure in order to design the foundation system and estimate the displacement of the soil while disregarding the change in seismic response that this induces. In this article, the foundation system was transformed into equivalent springs, and the seismic response in the linear range was compared and quantified, obtaining results such as increased periods, increased amounts of steel reinforcement in beams (between 7% and 25%) and columns (between 29% and 39%), an increase in the number of stirrups per linear meter (between 3% and 11% in columns and between 5% and 45% in beams) and drifts (between 1% and 14%), and a decrease in basal shear (up to 20%), which directly affects the design of the structure. This study concludes that the inclusion of the soil-structure interaction is necessary for structural design in the linear range. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-22T07:51:42Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f7a997a43355400e8809904079cfc1f1 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0120-5609 2248-8723 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-22T07:51:42Z |
| publishDate | 2021-07-01 |
| publisher | Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ingeniería e Investigación |
| spelling | doaj.art-f7a997a43355400e8809904079cfc1f12022-12-21T18:33:28ZengUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaIngeniería e Investigación0120-56092248-87232021-07-01421e86819e8681910.15446/ing.investig.v42n1.8681969524A Structural Design Comparison Between Two Reinforced Concrete Regular 6-Level Buildings using Soil-Structure Interaction in Linear RangeNelson Andrés López Machado0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3111-7952Gabriela Perez1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8097-8989Christian Castro2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8739-2040Juan Carlos Vielma Perez3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5426-2215Leonardo José López Machado4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1562-0662José Domingo Alviar Malabet5https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9613-0675Carlos Alberto Romero Romero6https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0974-8408David Patricio Guerrero Cuasapaz7https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8547-906XVanessa Viviana Montesinos Machado8https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5355-5099Pontifical Catholic University of ChilePolytechnic Salesian UniversityPolytechnic Salesian UniversityPontifical University of ValparaisoPontifical Catholic University of ChilePolytechnic Salesian UniversityPolytechnic Salesian UniversityPolytechnic Salesian UniversityCentre Western University Lisandro AlvaradoStructural engineers commonly design superstructures as fixed at the base and transmit the reactions to the infrastructure in order to design the foundation system and estimate the displacement of the soil while disregarding the change in seismic response that this induces. In this article, the foundation system was transformed into equivalent springs, and the seismic response in the linear range was compared and quantified, obtaining results such as increased periods, increased amounts of steel reinforcement in beams (between 7% and 25%) and columns (between 29% and 39%), an increase in the number of stirrups per linear meter (between 3% and 11% in columns and between 5% and 45% in beams) and drifts (between 1% and 14%), and a decrease in basal shear (up to 20%), which directly affects the design of the structure. This study concludes that the inclusion of the soil-structure interaction is necessary for structural design in the linear range.https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv/article/view/86819seismic responsefoundation systemsoil-structure interactionlinear range |
| spellingShingle | Nelson Andrés López Machado Gabriela Perez Christian Castro Juan Carlos Vielma Perez Leonardo José López Machado José Domingo Alviar Malabet Carlos Alberto Romero Romero David Patricio Guerrero Cuasapaz Vanessa Viviana Montesinos Machado A Structural Design Comparison Between Two Reinforced Concrete Regular 6-Level Buildings using Soil-Structure Interaction in Linear Range Ingeniería e Investigación seismic response foundation system soil-structure interaction linear range |
| title | A Structural Design Comparison Between Two Reinforced Concrete Regular 6-Level Buildings using Soil-Structure Interaction in Linear Range |
| title_full | A Structural Design Comparison Between Two Reinforced Concrete Regular 6-Level Buildings using Soil-Structure Interaction in Linear Range |
| title_fullStr | A Structural Design Comparison Between Two Reinforced Concrete Regular 6-Level Buildings using Soil-Structure Interaction in Linear Range |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Structural Design Comparison Between Two Reinforced Concrete Regular 6-Level Buildings using Soil-Structure Interaction in Linear Range |
| title_short | A Structural Design Comparison Between Two Reinforced Concrete Regular 6-Level Buildings using Soil-Structure Interaction in Linear Range |
| title_sort | structural design comparison between two reinforced concrete regular 6 level buildings using soil structure interaction in linear range |
| topic | seismic response foundation system soil-structure interaction linear range |
| url | https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv/article/view/86819 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT nelsonandreslopezmachado astructuraldesigncomparisonbetweentworeinforcedconcreteregular6levelbuildingsusingsoilstructureinteractioninlinearrange AT gabrielaperez astructuraldesigncomparisonbetweentworeinforcedconcreteregular6levelbuildingsusingsoilstructureinteractioninlinearrange AT christiancastro astructuraldesigncomparisonbetweentworeinforcedconcreteregular6levelbuildingsusingsoilstructureinteractioninlinearrange AT juancarlosvielmaperez astructuraldesigncomparisonbetweentworeinforcedconcreteregular6levelbuildingsusingsoilstructureinteractioninlinearrange AT leonardojoselopezmachado astructuraldesigncomparisonbetweentworeinforcedconcreteregular6levelbuildingsusingsoilstructureinteractioninlinearrange AT josedomingoalviarmalabet astructuraldesigncomparisonbetweentworeinforcedconcreteregular6levelbuildingsusingsoilstructureinteractioninlinearrange AT carlosalbertoromeroromero astructuraldesigncomparisonbetweentworeinforcedconcreteregular6levelbuildingsusingsoilstructureinteractioninlinearrange AT davidpatricioguerrerocuasapaz astructuraldesigncomparisonbetweentworeinforcedconcreteregular6levelbuildingsusingsoilstructureinteractioninlinearrange AT vanessavivianamontesinosmachado astructuraldesigncomparisonbetweentworeinforcedconcreteregular6levelbuildingsusingsoilstructureinteractioninlinearrange AT nelsonandreslopezmachado structuraldesigncomparisonbetweentworeinforcedconcreteregular6levelbuildingsusingsoilstructureinteractioninlinearrange AT gabrielaperez structuraldesigncomparisonbetweentworeinforcedconcreteregular6levelbuildingsusingsoilstructureinteractioninlinearrange AT christiancastro structuraldesigncomparisonbetweentworeinforcedconcreteregular6levelbuildingsusingsoilstructureinteractioninlinearrange AT juancarlosvielmaperez structuraldesigncomparisonbetweentworeinforcedconcreteregular6levelbuildingsusingsoilstructureinteractioninlinearrange AT leonardojoselopezmachado structuraldesigncomparisonbetweentworeinforcedconcreteregular6levelbuildingsusingsoilstructureinteractioninlinearrange AT josedomingoalviarmalabet structuraldesigncomparisonbetweentworeinforcedconcreteregular6levelbuildingsusingsoilstructureinteractioninlinearrange AT carlosalbertoromeroromero structuraldesigncomparisonbetweentworeinforcedconcreteregular6levelbuildingsusingsoilstructureinteractioninlinearrange AT davidpatricioguerrerocuasapaz structuraldesigncomparisonbetweentworeinforcedconcreteregular6levelbuildingsusingsoilstructureinteractioninlinearrange AT vanessavivianamontesinosmachado structuraldesigncomparisonbetweentworeinforcedconcreteregular6levelbuildingsusingsoilstructureinteractioninlinearrange |