How Community Pharmacists Perceive Ethics in Clinical Research: A Qualitative Study

In recent years, the importance of building evidence in clinical practice that is increasingly acknowledged globally has been recognized in Japan as well, and it is expected that clinical research by community pharmacists will grow. In Japan, however, community pharmacists have few opportunities to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Miku Ogura, Rieko Takehira, Tatsuya Watanabe, Etsuko Arita
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-11-01
Series:Healthcare
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/9/11/1496
_version_ 1797510193041375232
author Miku Ogura
Rieko Takehira
Tatsuya Watanabe
Etsuko Arita
author_facet Miku Ogura
Rieko Takehira
Tatsuya Watanabe
Etsuko Arita
author_sort Miku Ogura
collection DOAJ
description In recent years, the importance of building evidence in clinical practice that is increasingly acknowledged globally has been recognized in Japan as well, and it is expected that clinical research by community pharmacists will grow. In Japan, however, community pharmacists have few opportunities to learn about research ethics and may lack the training to make ethical decisions. We conducted a questionnaire survey of community pharmacists (<i>n</i> = 200) using a free descriptive format to understand how they perceived research ethics. Our qualitative analysis of 170 respondents revealed various perspectives (<A pharmacist’s grounding>, <How pharmacists perceive research>, and <Ethical issues entailed by research>) of Japanese pharmacists on ethics in the context of clinical research. With respect to how to understand research, the following perspectives were found: “research that prioritizes researchers,” “research that prioritizes research subjects (patients),” and “research that enters into regular work.” The perspectives on “research that prioritizes research subjects (patients)” and “research that enters into regular work” may inadvertently lead to ethically inappropriate research due to mismatch in professional values or poor understanding of research. These findings can contribute to the development of an educational program for community pharmacists on research ethics.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T05:28:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-f7b82c3f9eb5412a8f632db6ce1a376f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-9032
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T05:28:08Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Healthcare
spelling doaj.art-f7b82c3f9eb5412a8f632db6ce1a376f2023-11-22T23:31:42ZengMDPI AGHealthcare2227-90322021-11-01911149610.3390/healthcare9111496How Community Pharmacists Perceive Ethics in Clinical Research: A Qualitative StudyMiku Ogura0Rieko Takehira1Tatsuya Watanabe2Etsuko Arita3Laboratory of Medical Psychology, Pharmaceutical Education Research Center, Kitasato University School of Pharmacy, Tokyo 108-8641, JapanLaboratory of Medical Psychology, Pharmaceutical Education Research Center, Kitasato University School of Pharmacy, Tokyo 108-8641, JapanKitasato Clinical Research Center, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara 252-0374, JapanLaboratory of Medical Psychology, Pharmaceutical Education Research Center, Kitasato University School of Pharmacy, Tokyo 108-8641, JapanIn recent years, the importance of building evidence in clinical practice that is increasingly acknowledged globally has been recognized in Japan as well, and it is expected that clinical research by community pharmacists will grow. In Japan, however, community pharmacists have few opportunities to learn about research ethics and may lack the training to make ethical decisions. We conducted a questionnaire survey of community pharmacists (<i>n</i> = 200) using a free descriptive format to understand how they perceived research ethics. Our qualitative analysis of 170 respondents revealed various perspectives (<A pharmacist’s grounding>, <How pharmacists perceive research>, and <Ethical issues entailed by research>) of Japanese pharmacists on ethics in the context of clinical research. With respect to how to understand research, the following perspectives were found: “research that prioritizes researchers,” “research that prioritizes research subjects (patients),” and “research that enters into regular work.” The perspectives on “research that prioritizes research subjects (patients)” and “research that enters into regular work” may inadvertently lead to ethically inappropriate research due to mismatch in professional values or poor understanding of research. These findings can contribute to the development of an educational program for community pharmacists on research ethics.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/9/11/1496clinical researchethicscommunity pharmacistsqualitative researchresearch ethics education
spellingShingle Miku Ogura
Rieko Takehira
Tatsuya Watanabe
Etsuko Arita
How Community Pharmacists Perceive Ethics in Clinical Research: A Qualitative Study
Healthcare
clinical research
ethics
community pharmacists
qualitative research
research ethics education
title How Community Pharmacists Perceive Ethics in Clinical Research: A Qualitative Study
title_full How Community Pharmacists Perceive Ethics in Clinical Research: A Qualitative Study
title_fullStr How Community Pharmacists Perceive Ethics in Clinical Research: A Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed How Community Pharmacists Perceive Ethics in Clinical Research: A Qualitative Study
title_short How Community Pharmacists Perceive Ethics in Clinical Research: A Qualitative Study
title_sort how community pharmacists perceive ethics in clinical research a qualitative study
topic clinical research
ethics
community pharmacists
qualitative research
research ethics education
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/9/11/1496
work_keys_str_mv AT mikuogura howcommunitypharmacistsperceiveethicsinclinicalresearchaqualitativestudy
AT riekotakehira howcommunitypharmacistsperceiveethicsinclinicalresearchaqualitativestudy
AT tatsuyawatanabe howcommunitypharmacistsperceiveethicsinclinicalresearchaqualitativestudy
AT etsukoarita howcommunitypharmacistsperceiveethicsinclinicalresearchaqualitativestudy