Framework for Energy-Averaged Emission Mitigation Technique Adopting Gasoline-Methanol Blend Replacement and Piston Design Exchange
Measurement to mitigate automotive emission varies from energy content modification of fuel to waste energy recovery through energy system upgradation. The proposed energy-averaged emission mitigation technique involves interfacing piston design exchange and gasoline–methanol blend replacement with...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-09-01
|
| Series: | Energies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/19/7188 |
| _version_ | 1797479556029874176 |
|---|---|
| author | Prakash Chandra Mishra Anand Gupta Saikat Samanta Rihana B. Ishaq Fuad Khoshnaw |
| author_facet | Prakash Chandra Mishra Anand Gupta Saikat Samanta Rihana B. Ishaq Fuad Khoshnaw |
| author_sort | Prakash Chandra Mishra |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Measurement to mitigate automotive emission varies from energy content modification of fuel to waste energy recovery through energy system upgradation. The proposed energy-averaged emission mitigation technique involves interfacing piston design exchange and gasoline–methanol blend replacement with traditional gasoline for low carbon high energy content creation. Here, we interlinked the CO, CO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub>x</sub>, O<sub>2</sub>, and HC to different design exchanges of coated pistons through the available brake power and speed of the engine. We assessed the relative effectiveness of various designs and coating thicknesses for different gasoline–methanol blends (0%,5%,10%, and 15%). The analysis shows the replacement of 5%, 10%, and 15% by volume of gasoline with methanol reduces the fuel carbon by 4.167%, 8.34%, and 12.5%, respectively. The fuel characteristics of blends are comparable to gasoline, hence there is no energy infrastructure modification required to develop the same amount of power. The CO and HC reduced significantly, while CO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions are comparable. Increasing the coating thickness enhances the surface temperature retention and reduces heat transfer. The Type_C design of the steel piston and type_A design of the AlSi piston show temperature retention values of 582 °C and 598 °C, respectively. Type_A and type_B pistons are better compared to type_C and the type_D piston design for emission mitigation due to decarbonization of fuel through gasoline-methanol blend replacement. Surface response methodology predicts Delastic, σvon Mises, and Tsurface with percentage errors of 0.0042,0.35, and 0.9, respectively. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T21:46:57Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-f7bfc0a68a174964837b773f6650677d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1996-1073 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T21:46:57Z |
| publishDate | 2022-09-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Energies |
| spelling | doaj.art-f7bfc0a68a174964837b773f6650677d2023-11-23T20:14:40ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732022-09-011519718810.3390/en15197188Framework for Energy-Averaged Emission Mitigation Technique Adopting Gasoline-Methanol Blend Replacement and Piston Design ExchangePrakash Chandra Mishra0Anand Gupta1Saikat Samanta2Rihana B. Ishaq3Fuad Khoshnaw4Department of Mechanical Engineering, Veer Surendra Sai University of Technology, Burla 768018, IndiaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indira Gandhi Institute of Technology, Sarang 759146, IndiaSchool of Mechanical Engineering, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar 751024, IndiaSchool of Built Environment Engineering and Computing, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS1 3HE, UKSchool of Engineering and Sustainable Development, De Montfort University, Leicester LE1 9BH, UKMeasurement to mitigate automotive emission varies from energy content modification of fuel to waste energy recovery through energy system upgradation. The proposed energy-averaged emission mitigation technique involves interfacing piston design exchange and gasoline–methanol blend replacement with traditional gasoline for low carbon high energy content creation. Here, we interlinked the CO, CO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub>x</sub>, O<sub>2</sub>, and HC to different design exchanges of coated pistons through the available brake power and speed of the engine. We assessed the relative effectiveness of various designs and coating thicknesses for different gasoline–methanol blends (0%,5%,10%, and 15%). The analysis shows the replacement of 5%, 10%, and 15% by volume of gasoline with methanol reduces the fuel carbon by 4.167%, 8.34%, and 12.5%, respectively. The fuel characteristics of blends are comparable to gasoline, hence there is no energy infrastructure modification required to develop the same amount of power. The CO and HC reduced significantly, while CO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>x</sub> emissions are comparable. Increasing the coating thickness enhances the surface temperature retention and reduces heat transfer. The Type_C design of the steel piston and type_A design of the AlSi piston show temperature retention values of 582 °C and 598 °C, respectively. Type_A and type_B pistons are better compared to type_C and the type_D piston design for emission mitigation due to decarbonization of fuel through gasoline-methanol blend replacement. Surface response methodology predicts Delastic, σvon Mises, and Tsurface with percentage errors of 0.0042,0.35, and 0.9, respectively.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/19/7188energy-averaged emission mitigationgasoline-methanol blendpiston design exchangefuel carbon reduction |
| spellingShingle | Prakash Chandra Mishra Anand Gupta Saikat Samanta Rihana B. Ishaq Fuad Khoshnaw Framework for Energy-Averaged Emission Mitigation Technique Adopting Gasoline-Methanol Blend Replacement and Piston Design Exchange Energies energy-averaged emission mitigation gasoline-methanol blend piston design exchange fuel carbon reduction |
| title | Framework for Energy-Averaged Emission Mitigation Technique Adopting Gasoline-Methanol Blend Replacement and Piston Design Exchange |
| title_full | Framework for Energy-Averaged Emission Mitigation Technique Adopting Gasoline-Methanol Blend Replacement and Piston Design Exchange |
| title_fullStr | Framework for Energy-Averaged Emission Mitigation Technique Adopting Gasoline-Methanol Blend Replacement and Piston Design Exchange |
| title_full_unstemmed | Framework for Energy-Averaged Emission Mitigation Technique Adopting Gasoline-Methanol Blend Replacement and Piston Design Exchange |
| title_short | Framework for Energy-Averaged Emission Mitigation Technique Adopting Gasoline-Methanol Blend Replacement and Piston Design Exchange |
| title_sort | framework for energy averaged emission mitigation technique adopting gasoline methanol blend replacement and piston design exchange |
| topic | energy-averaged emission mitigation gasoline-methanol blend piston design exchange fuel carbon reduction |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/19/7188 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT prakashchandramishra frameworkforenergyaveragedemissionmitigationtechniqueadoptinggasolinemethanolblendreplacementandpistondesignexchange AT anandgupta frameworkforenergyaveragedemissionmitigationtechniqueadoptinggasolinemethanolblendreplacementandpistondesignexchange AT saikatsamanta frameworkforenergyaveragedemissionmitigationtechniqueadoptinggasolinemethanolblendreplacementandpistondesignexchange AT rihanabishaq frameworkforenergyaveragedemissionmitigationtechniqueadoptinggasolinemethanolblendreplacementandpistondesignexchange AT fuadkhoshnaw frameworkforenergyaveragedemissionmitigationtechniqueadoptinggasolinemethanolblendreplacementandpistondesignexchange |